Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

4sallypat

macrumors 68040
Sep 16, 2016
3,600
3,388
So Calif
Very cool! Your photo makes the stand look MUCH more blue than it is in person. Everyone who saw my new iMac was wowed with it. No one talked trash about bezels or colors, I think these will sell like crazy.
Here's how the iMac lines up with a 24" Apple Cinema Display (left).

The webcams show a big difference (720 vs 1080) - at least I get to choose which one I feel like using when I am on a Zoom conference...

For a 11 year old display, it sure looks good and the speakers still work, although the iMac speakers are superior!
IMG_7360.jpg
 

usagora

macrumors 601
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,454
For some reason I didn't notice until seeing some of these pictures that the stand is actually glossy?

1622134647576.png
 

usagora

macrumors 601
Nov 17, 2017
4,869
4,454
It’s anodised aluminium. It’s not glossy but the sheen of light on the metal.

It's all anodized aluminum, not just the stand. Look at the photo I posted. There's a clear difference in sheen between the chin and the stand. And other pictures on this thread show the same thing. You can even see reflections in this one. My 2019 iMac does not have that property:

1622136647665.png
 

glenthompson

macrumors demi-god
Apr 27, 2011
2,983
844
Virginia
The stand and back have a metallic sheen. The back of my red is almost a metallic finish. The chin is colored under the glass. Even if iy were metal, the glass would mute the sheen somewhat. My guess is that both the chin and bezels are a coating on the back of the glass.
 

Bodhitree

macrumors 68020
Apr 5, 2021
2,019
2,133
Netherlands
Most of the day the machine is dead silent, and I can barely feel warm air coming from the vents. When I did a transcode of a movie using the latest native Handbrake beta, that maxed out the CPU and got the fans running to what I would guess was full blast, which was loud but not obnoxiously so, and then there was *plenty* of hot air coming out.

This does surprise and worry me a little, I was expecting it to be totally cool with barely a need for fans, like the M1 Macbook Pro. Does it actually get hot? If so, is it clocked differently from the laptops?
 

glenthompson

macrumors demi-god
Apr 27, 2011
2,983
844
Virginia
This does surprise and worry me a little, I was expecting it to be totally cool with barely a need for fans, like the M1 Macbook Pro. Does it actually get hot? If so, is it clocked differently from the laptops?
I haven't stressed mine as much and haven't heard the fans at all. Was just doing some light work and the back of the case near the CPU felt only slightly warmer than the rest of the case. When I was still involved in setup and syncing up my iCloud documents and photos the low power cores were running about 40-60% load but the high power ones never got above 20%. I'm confident that my max workload is never going to tax this machine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AdamInKent

uller6

macrumors 65816
May 14, 2010
1,063
1,747
This does surprise and worry me a little, I was expecting it to be totally cool with barely a need for fans, like the M1 Macbook Pro. Does it actually get hot? If so, is it clocked differently from the laptops?
I was a little surprised how hot the iMac gets too, but I do appreciate the sustained performance and even going full out the M1 iMac only pulls 45 watts from the wall. In regular use the M1 is definitely warm to the touch but the fans are silent. The M1 iMac has the same clock speeds as the M1 in the laptops, but can sustain the performance at higher speeds for longer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AdamInKent

neilw

macrumors 6502
Aug 4, 2003
454
907
New Jersey
This does surprise and worry me a little, I was expecting it to be totally cool with barely a need for fans, like the M1 Macbook Pro. Does it actually get hot? If so, is it clocked differently from the laptops?
Don't be worried. *Any* modern CPU running any length of time at 100% will generate significant heat. The fact that it was blowing that much hot air means that it was doing a good job at removing the heat.

Remember, the fanless and silent M1 Air would generate the same amount of heat, but it has much less ability to get rid of it, so it just throttles the processor.

Other than when I did my Handbrake test, I haven't heard the fans once, and I can't feel any heat coming out the vents. This is a cool and quiet machine.
 

za9ra22

macrumors 65816
Sep 25, 2003
1,441
1,924
Was going to do a 'smart' reply telling all the 24" iMac was first released in 2008, but better not perhaps ~ not much fun or joy around the M1 with many posters.

The original 24-inch was my first iMac. Well, since then I got a G4 17-inch, but that 24 was awesome! It weighed a ton, but it stayed in service for about 6 years!
 

iDave

macrumors 65816
Aug 14, 2003
1,028
299
Got mine last Friday and had some issues getting it set up because I decided on a clean install rather than a migration of all my old data. (Major housecleaning!) But that was my fault and I'm getting used to the reorganization.

Several days later now that the hard part is over I'm really enjoying using the new iMac. It replaces a 27" model from 2014 which I liked at first but eventually decided it was a desk hog and too big for my needs. With this new model it's easier to reach around back to connect a cable. (Still, I kinda wish there was one port on the edge for connecting things which are only temporary, like a backup drive or a phone.) The keyboard and trackpad are great. Having used a 12" MacBook keyboard and the one from my old 27" iMac for years, this keyboard has a much better feel. I haven't even unpacked the mouse yet. (Kinda wish I hadn't even bought the mouse now.) The system really flies. Apps launch instantly and I've seen no unexpected delays of any kind. The speakers sound fantastic from a close distance which is the only way I'll ever use them. I've yet to hear the fans come on. The Mac is almost too light because when connecting a cable to the back I nearly always unintentionally move it. But that's not a problem. :)

Just to comment on the naysayers; considering that lots of people, especially those on the go, do a lot of serious work on MacBooks with 12-16 inch screens, it's comical to say that 24" is too small. For the minuscule percentage who actually need giant displays, there are big options. As for some disliking the colors; who cares. I got green and I don't notice the color when using the computer. When the computer is off, the green looks very sharp and adds a little color to my otherwise dull room. My old gray iMac looks positively ancient and boring now. It'll be in a closet or on eBay soon.
 

boomom999

macrumors newbie
May 27, 2021
10
4
I actually prefer the 24" size rather than a larger display, if I wanted a TV (ehm, presentation monitor) on my desk, I would just get one. I think you were partially joking, but I wish Apple would stop associating screen size with performance.
I had the 2017 21" version. Sold it & got a MBP, and while I love the MacBook, I also want a desktop computer. Years ago, before I got my iMac, my husband had the opportunity to bring a 27" home for me to check out; I hated it! It just felt too big; I had to search for everything I wanted. The 21" filled the space on my desk, and I could focus on the entire screen in one glance. (Of course, it was an absolute slug, which is why I sold it.) I can see that others might feel differently, but this one looks just right! I'm trying to be sensible, but it's really just a matter of time before I buy...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Altis and Tikatika

boomom999

macrumors newbie
May 27, 2021
10
4
Got mine last Friday and had some issues getting it set up because I decided on a clean install rather than a migration of all my old data. (Major housecleaning!) But that was my fault and I'm getting used to the reorganization.

Several days later now that the hard part is over I'm really enjoying using the new iMac. It replaces a 27" model from 2014 which I liked at first but eventually decided it was a desk hog and too big for my needs. With this new model it's easier to reach around back to connect a cable. (Still, I kinda wish there was one port on the edge for connecting things which are only temporary, like a backup drive or a phone.) The keyboard and trackpad are great. Having used a 12" MacBook keyboard and the one from my old 27" iMac for years, this keyboard has a much better feel. I haven't even unpacked the mouse yet. (Kinda wish I hadn't even bought the mouse now.) The system really flies. Apps launch instantly and I've seen no unexpected delays of any kind. The speakers sound fantastic from a close distance which is the only way I'll ever use them. I've yet to hear the fans come on. The Mac is almost too light because when connecting a cable to the back I nearly always unintentionally move it. But that's not a problem. :)

Just to comment on the naysayers; considering that lots of people, especially those on the go, do a lot of serious work on MacBooks with 12-16 inch screens, it's comical to say that 24" is too small. For the minuscule percentage who actually need giant displays, there are big options. As for some disliking the colors; who cares. I got green and I don't notice the color when using the computer. When the computer is off, the green looks very sharp and adds a little color to my otherwise dull room. My old gray iMac looks positively ancient and boring now. It'll be in a closet or on eBay soon.
"Just to comment on the naysayers; considering that lots of people, especially those on the go, do a lot of serious work on MacBooks with 12-16 inch screens, it's comical to say that 24" is too small." I agree. I do a bit of architectural design on my 2020 MBP, with no problem at all. Sadly, the program won't work with the M1 - it'd be great on the 24" screen!
 

Bodhitree

macrumors 68020
Apr 5, 2021
2,019
2,133
Netherlands
Just to comment on the naysayers; considering that lots of people, especially those on the go, do a lot of serious work on MacBooks with 12-16 inch screens, it's comical to say that 24" is too small. For the minuscule percentage who actually need giant displays, there are big options.

That was the lesson of my 13” MBA, it was fine for doing lots of things on, but too slow and too small for serious development work. I’m hoping that the 24’’ iMac will hit the sweet spot, a screen that is large enough and pleasant to look at, and a processor that is fast enough.

I was considering holding out for the larger 30” iMac that is rumoured to be on the way, but I’m not sure if it would actually be less pleasant to work on, too big, too much eye travel, and the processor might be overkill for my needs. With programming there’s an adage, there is never too much screen space, but honestly most of my dev career I worked on CRT screens at 21” and smaller. I’ve decided to buy the Mac I need now, rather than the one I might have in six months for considerably more money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Agile55

Agile55

macrumors 6502
Jul 18, 2008
359
137
TX
The original 24-inch was my first iMac. Well, since then I got a G4 17-inch, but that 24 was awesome! It weighed a ton, but it stayed in service for about 6 years!

Same sit. here, as my 1st was a refurb‘d 2007 24” bought in ‘08 that was in use ‘til last Friday when my blue 24” replaced it.
 

Altis

macrumors 68040
Sep 10, 2013
3,167
4,898
This was very informative and worth seeing.

Interesting video. I can't help but wonder how much of a difference it would have made if he got the mid-tier and 16 GB of RAM. A few hundred dollars more and it might have been even more comparable with his very expensive iMac Pro.
 

Warped9

macrumors 68000
Oct 27, 2018
1,715
2,397
Brockville, Ontario.
Interesting video. I can't help but wonder how much of a difference it would have made if he got the mid-tier and 16 GB of RAM. A few hundred dollars more and it might have been even more comparable with his very expensive iMac Pro.
I thought the same thing. But the underlying point here is this really undermines all the detractors proclaiming the new iMac is not a serious computer for ”professionals.” The 24 is capable of doing a lot of “serious” work for a lot of people except a very few demanding individuals.

This also underscores my own concerns that 24in. with 16GB should be ample to do the 3D modelling work I want to do.
 

PeterJP

macrumors 65816
Feb 2, 2012
1,136
896
Leuven, Belgium
Just to comment on the naysayers; considering that lots of people, especially those on the go, do a lot of serious work on MacBooks with 12-16 inch screens, it's comical to say that 24" is too small. For the minuscule percentage who actually need giant displays, there are big options. As for some disliking the colors; who cares. I got green and I don't notice the color when using the computer. When the computer is off, the green looks very sharp and adds a little color to my otherwise dull room. My old gray iMac looks positively ancient and boring now. It'll be in a closet or on eBay soon.
I have a 16/512 M1 mac mini connected to a 27" screen, so I'm quite familiar with the capabilities of the architecture. Yeah, it should be sufficient for just about anybody with very few exceptions. But I will still say that I want 27 or more inches to my screen. I'm currently working on fairly simple pieces of music in Logic, around 5-15 tracks. Even with my 16" scaled to show "most on screen", there is just not enough space and it gets really squinty. I tried Logic on my 27" screen on another desk and it was much better. Also, everybody at work here, from the video editors to social media to the accounting department, all have 27" screens as well. So yeah, I see plenty of use cases where bigger = better. It's good for you that 24" works well for you and for several others, though. That's why Apple has more than one size to choose from.
 

za9ra22

macrumors 65816
Sep 25, 2003
1,441
1,924
Just to comment on the naysayers; considering that lots of people, especially those on the go, do a lot of serious work on MacBooks with 12-16 inch screens, it's comical to say that 24" is too small.

I had not even considered this, but it is true. Given the move towards laptops in sales figures over the years, and the fact that most have 13-15 inch screens, it really is a puzzle why so many are suggesting that a 24-inch iMac is too small for them, or their 'serious' work.

There are always going to be some use cases where a large screen is essential, but I seriously doubt it's anywhere near the number who seem to be suggesting it. And for many of those who do, a decent external to span the desktop would be plenty enough anyway.
 

DanTSX

Suspended
Oct 22, 2013
1,111
1,505
Was going to do a 'smart' reply telling all the 24" iMac was first released in 2008, but better not perhaps ~ not much fun or joy around the M1 with many posters.
We know. We owned those previously as well. They were nice for the time, but a step down from the deign of the G4 iMac before it. They were entirely forgettable between better generations.

The 2021 model 24” is the 24” of significance.
 

DMG35

Contributor
May 27, 2021
2,369
7,500
I have to admit, I was one of the people who had some negative initial thoughts about the new iMacs. I purchased one for my daughter as a graduation present and let me tell you, its awesome and I want one. I'd have a hard time giving up my iMac Pro but spending a little time on hers has given me major jealousy towards it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: neilw
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.