It's always interesting to learn about internal strife or dissension within Apple since it rarely escapes the secrecy.
Troll harder?
$250 or bust
It's important to remember that this "7 inch" iPad people are talking about is rumored to be closer to 8 inches.
The math I saw worked out to this smaller iPad having 40% more screen space than the current 7" Android tablets.
So worth remembering...when Steve said those 7" tablets were too small they could still have been planning something in between that and the current iPads.
I miss Steve too # hope god is not beating himI miss Steve.
I always looked forward to his presentations. He used to have me so excited to purchase the next Apple product.
The best case against an ipad mini in my mind, is that it would cannibalize sales of the existing ipad.
http://www.fool.com/investing/gener...nt-against-apples-ipad-mini.aspx#.UBxylqP4JcY
Post Job's mistakes:
#1 ipad mini
#2 the iphone 5 screen size, and overall appearance.
I'm sure there is some "good" reason for the 16x9 ratio on the new iphone. Apple likes to make design changes that have a function (the iphone 4 antenna). Maybe the long screen is because we get an extra row of icons, or for watching movies? Or maybe its easier for app developers to adapt? Also, Apple loves they're pixle density, and maybe they think a bigger screen would diminish all they're hard work on lcd's. In any case its disappointing to me.
The teardrop iphone with wider screen would have sold zillions. But in a post Job's era, maybe they're stuck on the idea that their products should go against popular opinion, as thy have in the past with great success. Job's would have know the difference.
Maybe he is referring to the seal skin? Steve Jobs would have never allowed the seal skin back on the iPad.
7" ipads will be bought mostly for kids and teens or people that can't afford a full size iPad
It's pointless.
Yes. And I also don't like the idea of a 7" tablet. The rumored miniature iPad is the right size. After that, there is not really any room for more devices with different screen sizes. Phones should really only go a little above 4" at max, tablets should be at least 7.8", laptops at least 12" and at most 17", and desktops from 17" to 30" (well 21" for my bad eyes).
Eddy Cue also wanted to use baby seal skin for the rear cover.
Evil, evil man.
Whatever decision made at Apple, it always had to be approved by Jobs first.
7" ipads will be bought mostly for kids and teens or people that can't afford a full size iPad
It's pointless.
Apple needs to release a 7 inch product. However it would be best in the 7.0 inch size and 16x10 aspect ratio like the nexus 7. The nexus seven you can hold in one hand with your hand around both edges comfortably. If it was 4:3 you couldn't do this in the vertical orientation. Also when used in landscape the 16x10 ratio is by far the best. The nexus 7 is an excellent product and apple needs to address it.
I've had it for a few weeks now and my ipad 2 has gotten very little use. In landscape in the browser it s amazing. Very smooth, fast and the text looks great. Even better if you install paranoid android which allows you to use the tablet combined bar which saves some more vertical real estate.
Interesting. I'm the opposite. After having the Nexus 7 two weeks I returned it. Didn't like it at all. As Steve Jobs stated a 7" tablet isn't an ideal size. I agree with that.
The iPod touch costs $200 (which I think is a bit much), so I doubt a device more than twice the size of it will cost merely $250.
------
I think that 7" is too small, but the smaller iPad is a good size.
Peoples have a wrong perception of Steve Jobs, mainly because lots of peoples didn't agree with is view. The popular and most common way to react to that is to conclude that the person is then close minded and simply stubborn.
However, when you listen to Steve Jobs, you realize that he really was able to argue and defend his way of seeing things very well, actually way better than most. And when you read about his life and how it worked at Apple, even if the guy was clearly a fierce opponent, he still was very open to arguments and debate and knew how to draw back when he didn't had arguments to back his position.
For example, he actually was against bringing the iPod to Windows, eventually when it became clear that he really didn't had any reason not to, he changed his mind, same thing with letting third-party write Apps for the iPhone.
I've read a lot about Steve Jobs over the years and watched almost all the interview he did. He was intense, but he really wasn't a blinded dogmatic like how most peoples seem to describe him.
Just because there is a market for something doesn't mean that Apple always has to compete in it. There's a market for computers that are less than $200 - it doesn't mean that Apple should automatically compete there.
I think that in general Steve Jobs is generally right about the user-experience, a big screen is usually better. The only thing that I think of though is that using a 7 inch iPad in bed would be a lot more comfortable, but I guess that's also a use case where you can say that the phone is what you should be using if you want to rest comfortably on your side.
I think that Apple would probably be best off focusing on a limited number of products, so I'm hesitant to suggest that Apple create a smaller iPad, but it sounds like the pressure to compete there is going to eventually win out and Apple will possibly compete here very soon.
Interesting. I'm the opposite. After having the Nexus 7 two weeks I returned it. Didn't like it at all. As Steve Jobs stated a 7" tablet isn't an ideal size. I agree with that.
Just the same I'm glad I tried the Nexus 7. For the Android experience I prefer my large screen Android phone ... renders text better than the N7 and fits in the pocket too. If not using the phone then it's an iPad sized tablet for me, the screen is the perfect size for a tablet, IMO.
Doesn't mean that Apple won't make a 7" tablet, there's a market there, but I'm convinced anything smaller than an iPad is a poorer user experience.