Was the new sync feature turned on by the company without the ability for the user to turn off?Lawsuit incoming. This will be too big for this small company to handle!
If this announcement is causing anyone to look around for a different email provider / client, you might like to check out ProtonMail. It’s designed for data privacy and security, they don’t scan your emails, and your data is stored outside the US, just in case that’s a factor for you. Their IOS and Android apps are adequate (clean, minimalist, stable) , and you can use a few popular desktop clients on Windows , MacOS, or Linux with their Bridge program, a proxy that runs on your desktop and handles encryption/decryption before your messages leave your device. I’m not affiliated — just a happy customer for a couple years now. YMMV.
As for providers that use an advanced API for authentication that MAY be possible, but for plain simple IMAP or POP there is no token or API based access. Username+Password it is.While an employee may be able to take advantage of their position and somehow access your email, it's not like they storing plaintext passwords. The mail provider sets up authentication with the server, but it doesn't continually need to login again with the users password.
If for no other reason, we know this is true because no one would willingly get into a business that forces you to be responsible for plaintext passwords unless they had no understanding of basic security.
It might be very difficult for them to find a new job after this mess.As a software developer, I am feeling for the team that's responsible for this stuff up. Ouch, that's job/career/company ending stuff. The pain, horror, and fear they must be feeling right now.
How about the pain, horror and fear that some users may feel about having sensitive emails exposed to unkown persons?As a software developer, I am feeling for the team that's responsible for this stuff up. Ouch, that's job/career/company ending stuff. The pain, horror, and fear they must be feeling right now.
I have contacted their support only once, but they replied within a day. And you can use custom domains with the Plus account.I tried Protonmail Plus but it lacks customer support and I wasn't able to use it with my own domain. "Support" takes 5 days to respond and when they do it's a canned response that has nothing to do with your question.
As for providers that use an advanced API for authentication that MAY be possible, but for plain simple IMAP or POP there is no token or API based access. Username+Password it is.
The smart option would be to not store the password server side at all, but in the app itself and the server requests it from the app as needed (e.g. on reboot). (This would be very difficult to hack compared to the database approach, even if not much attention is paid to security.)
As such the credentials would only be cached in the memory of the server rather than in a database. Further to that all content on the server should be encrypted preferably using a public key generated by the app and stored on the server with the private key sitting in the app.
With that technology the "accident" that happened to edison would have been technically virtually impossible...
How about the pain, horror and fear that some users may feel about having sensitive emails exposed to unkown persons?
[automerge]1589671594[/automerge]
I have contacted their support only once, but they replied within a day. And you can use custom domains with the Plus account.
It does. But this is a problem with the way Edison handles your email.What does the length of a token have to do with being able to steal it from a 3rd party server?
This is just false. Once the token has been authorized by the user (which in Edison's case happens when you configure the account in the app), it can be used to access the emails the same way that e.g. Edison's servers use. No 2FA required.
In terms of access security, oauth tokens are only marginally better than account passwords (because their access is usually more restricted), and no better than the "app passwords" that services like Google hand out to enable IMAP clients to access accounts with enabled 2FA.
Yes, but my device is under my control and not exposed to the Internet like some cloud server.
You need to learn how oauth works. The fact that this incident affects Gmail accounts just as much as IMAP accounts should tell you that oauth doesn't provide protection.
Things like this is why I never use an email app that requires me to store things on the servers belonging to the developer or company. I just want something that accesses my email server and that’s it.
Everyone is trying to be Google and scan people’s email so they can sell marketing data.
I'm so bored I'm tempted to download the app just to read other people's emails.
UPDATE from Edison:
In the Edison App, pls go to Settings> Manage Privacy> Delete Stored Data. Please update all your email passwords. We are actively working on this issue and hope to have it resolved quickly. If you have any questions pls send us an email at support.
This concern can be greatly alleviated by using an email service that stores emails with zero-knowledge encryption, such as Protonmail or Tutanota. POP is just no longer a good solution at a time when most of us access their email from multiple different devices ...Do you leave your mail on the server, or do you POP it down? Or are you running your own mail exchange? aren’t you storing everything on the servers belonging to the developer or company when you use IMAP?
I understand it shouldn't be doing it. I was just hoping to offer a solution - quitting the app completely, minimizing it, or hiding (command-H) seem to be workarounds. Hopefully an actual fix comes at some point, but I don't know because the full-screen aspect to Mac OS feels very "bolted-on" to me. Mail isn't the only app that sometimes steals focus in full-screen mode.
Their website claims direct IMAP connection but, the results show otherwise.Why the hell do E-mail accounts EVER cross paths? The E-mail client should be making a direct IMAP connection to your account. There should be nothing stored on the company's server nor should there be any credential saving.
Every E-mail client I've used in the 25 years I've been using E-mail clients has made a direct IMAP connection to the server. In order for you to be seeing someone else's E-mails that means the company must be caching them somewhere that's not your device. Why the hell??