Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Apple2GS

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 31, 2016
333
625
US of A
I'm considering adding a eGPU to my MacMini. I have a 4K monitor and find that the graphics performance to be slow. I'm not talking about gaming but just dragging, scrolling, or maximizing windows. In reading reviews, its not clear if the Mac will use the eGPU for normal UI use.

Reviews talk about the need to enable app specific use of the eGPU. Is this relevant for a MacMini or only MacBook Pros with a dedicated GPU. if connected to a eGPU I would only want to use the external GPU and turn off the integrated one. Is this possible and does an eGPU help a MacMini with normal UI performance?
 
I'm considering adding a eGPU to my MacMini. I have a 4K monitor and find that the graphics performance to be slow. I'm not talking about gaming but just dragging, scrolling, or maximizing windows. In reading reviews, its not clear if the Mac will use the eGPU for normal UI use.

Reviews talk about the need to enable app specific use of the eGPU. Is this relevant for a MacMini or only MacBook Pros with a dedicated GPU. if connected to a eGPU I would only want to use the external GPU and turn off the integrated one. Is this possible and does an eGPU help a MacMini with normal UI performance?
Which generation of Mac Mini is it? Slow ui might be because of the 4k not being run at 60Hz, more likely at 30Hz. THAT feels horrible. Without the egpu I would choose to lower the resolution so that it ran at 60Hz. Cheapest way to get acceptable performance at ui level.
 
Last edited:
I have the 2018 MacMini. My other computer is a PC without integrated graphics and an RX 590. The UI is much faster on the PC. Im wondering if a eGPU will improve overall UI performance or is a eGPU only for games and certain apps.
 
If connected I believe (caveat emptor) that a EGPU should be able take over all the graphic work from the internal GPU all the time, not just in games. Mac Mini -> EGPU -> External display. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208544

If you have an external display connected to your eGPU, you can choose it as the primary display for all apps. Since apps default to the GPU associated with the primary display, this option works with a variety of apps.

If you disconnect the eGPU, your Mac defaults back to the internal graphics processors that drives the built-in display. When the eGPU is re-attached, it automatically sets the external display as the primary display.

I've got the simplest MBP 15 inch from Mid 2015 with Intel Iris Pro and the UI is feels reasonably fast and responsible on a 4K display, though not "overpoweringly" so. Not everything is as smooth as it can be.

Latest generation Mac Mini has Intel UHD Graphics 630 and support for the following combination of maximum concurrent display setups:
  • Up to three displays:
    Two displays with 4096-by-2304 resolution at 60Hz connected via Thunderbolt 3 plus one display with 4096-by-2160 resolution at 60Hz connected via HDMI 2.0
  • Up to two displays:
    One display with 5120-by-2880 resolution at 60Hz connected via Thunderbolt 3 plus one display with 4096-by-2160 resolution at 60Hz connected via HDMI 2.0
Could you have a display cable not up to the current standard? https://turbofuture.com/computers/do-i-need-hdmi-cable-4k-hdmi-20-guide
 
Last edited:
i also have a very similar question. I am wondering if I'm just looking for general display performance (UI) improvement, can I just connect the egpu to the mac mini 2018 directly? (monitor not going through the egpu)
 
How bad do you feel that the 4K performance on an 2018 Mac Mini is to try to solve it with an EGPU?

For me it's ok as long as the mouse pointer is smooth, since that's used much more frequently.
If the resizing, dragging, or maximizing of windows isn't 60 FPS it's less of an issue.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 (MacBook Pro 2015) vs UHD Graphics 630 (Mac Mini 2018)
https://technical.city/en/video/Iris-Pro-Graphics-5200-vs-UHD-Graphics-630

Intel Core i3-8100 (Mac Mini 2018) vs i7-4770HQ (MacBook Pro 2015)
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-4770HQ-vs-Intel-Core-i3-8100/m18784vs3942
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/209/Intel_Core_i3_i3-8100_vs_Intel_Core_i7_Mobile_i7-4770HQ.html
 
How bad do you feel that the 4K performance on an 2018 Mac Mini is to try to solve it with an EGPU?

For me it's ok as long as the mouse pointer is smooth, since that's used much more frequently.
If the resizing, dragging, or maximizing of windows isn't 60 FPS it's less of an issue.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200 (MacBook Pro 2015) vs UHD Graphics 630 (Mac Mini 2018)
https://technical.city/en/video/Iris-Pro-Graphics-5200-vs-UHD-Graphics-630

Intel Core i3-8100 (Mac Mini 2018) vs i7-4770HQ (MacBook Pro 2015)
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i7-4770HQ-vs-Intel-Core-i3-8100/m18784vs3942
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/209/Intel_Core_i3_i3-8100_vs_Intel_Core_i7_Mobile_i7-4770HQ.html

everything else works flawlessly, except for photoshop. I work with 200 - 500MB files. It isn't smooth in this program, especially when dealing with brushes. (brush cursor often disappear)
This appeared after i upgraded my monitor and I am assuming that the internal gpu is now taxed to run a 5k monitor as well as needing to display an image heavy program?

would an egpu help with my photoshop display performance issues?
 
everything else works flawlessly, except for photoshop. I work with 200 - 500MB files. It isn't smooth in this program, especially when dealing with brushes. (brush cursor often disappear)
This appeared after i upgraded my monitor and I am assuming that the internal gpu is now taxed to run a 5k monitor as well as needing to display an image heavy program?

would an egpu help with my photoshop display performance issues?
That would be the logical conclusion, yes.

But the subscription Photoshop CC nowadays automatically updates itself and it could also be a temporary bug. Check forums.adobe.com if anyone else has this problem. A quick search showed many with that question there.

From: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204349
An integrated GPU provides effective graphics support and shares video memory with the main system.

If your Mac Mini have 8 GB of system memory, and it worked fine with a normal monitor, but with all 14,7 miljon pixels of a 5K monitor it lags in certain situations it could be the added stress of "low memory". Time for an upgrade – do you have 8, 16, 32 or 64 GB RAM?
 
That would be the logical conclusion, yes.

But the subscription Photoshop CC nowadays automatically updates itself and it could also be a temporary bug. Check forums.adobe.com if anyone else has this problem. A quick search showed many with that question there.

From: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204349
An integrated GPU provides effective graphics support and shares video memory with the main system.

If your Mac Mini have 8 GB of system memory, and it worked fine with a normal monitor, but with all 14,7 miljon pixels of a 5K monitor it lags in certain situations it could be the added stress of "low memory". Time for an upgrade – do you have 8, 16, 32 or 64 GB RAM?

thanks for responding. i have 32GBs and Im assuming that should be plenty to run the display, as everything else works fine. I will have a look on the adobe forum. hopefully this is just a bug and nothing else. as, the macmini runs great everywhere else....
 
thanks for responding. i have 32GBs and Im assuming that should be plenty to run the display, as everything else works fine. I will have a look on the adobe forum. hopefully this is just a bug and nothing else. as, the macmini runs great everywhere else....
32 GB should be enough for a lot of layers, heavy images and advanced brushes.

Barefeats.com has done many comparisons and have the following articles about Mac Mini 2018 with EGPU:

Why the 2018 Mac mini really needs an eGPU
https://barefeats.com/mac-mini-needs-egpu.html
The weakest subsystem in the newest Mac mini is the GPU: Intel UHD Graphics 630. See what adding various models of eGPU and GPU will do for its graphics performance.

Can the 2018 Mac mini with an eGPU compete with the "Big Dogs" running Pro Apps?
https://barefeats.com/mac-mini-versus-pro-macs.html
After we published results for a 2018 Mac mini with an eGPU box, the question was raised, "Is it now on par with an upgraded Mac Pro tower or a low-end iMac Pro -- running Pro Apps?" We have an answer.

Do Pro Apps Run Faster on the 2018 Mac mini with an eGPU?
https://barefeats.com/mac-mini-needs-egpu-pro-apps.html
The previous article used GPU intensive benchmarks and games to highlight the benefits of adding an eGPU to the 2018 Mac mini. Today we show how it may or may not improve the performance of pro apps.

2018 Mac mini versus other Macs
https://barefeats.com/mac-mini-2018-versus-other-macs.html
As expected, the performance of the Intel UHD Graphics 630 GPU was disappointing. The Mac mini 'screams' for an eGPU. We used the AKiTiO Node Pro with the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier installed to illustrate the gains possible if you are running GPU intensive apps.
 
Last edited:
For best performance with LG ultrafine 5k how do you go about?

Monitor — to eGPU — to Mac mini
or
Monitor and eGPU both plugged into mac mini?
 
Thank you, @gymrat2k for those threads.

@oppastopa based on this test: https://barefeats.com/mac-mini-needs-egpu-pro-apps.html it seems that an indirect connection (monitor & egpu both connected to mini) works fine. though, they didn't test any adobe softwares.

Also, it appears that the only easy direct egpu connection with the ultrafines are with the $$$ blackmagic...

i have been searching the internet on indirect performances as well, however there are barely any. Most discussions it seems were also 1.5+ years old. And with the recent updates of the macOS, it seems that egpu is better supported and I have a feeling those information may no longer be accurate.

let me know if you find any new info. in the mean time, im gonna do a lot more tests with my photoshop settings. HOPING that this is a photoshop bug.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gymrat2k
I have the 2018 MacMini. My other computer is a PC without integrated graphics and an RX 590. The UI is much faster on the PC. Im wondering if a eGPU will improve overall UI performance or is a eGPU only for games and certain apps.

The 2018 is perfectly capable of running 4k smoothly. (Source: I run both a 5K and a 4K monitor side by side) Have you checked if your monitor and cable support HDMI 2.0? Earlier versions of HDMI only support 4K at 30 hz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gymrat2k
reporting back on my mac mini 2018 with an egpu.
to recap, i have an LG 5k monitor and i have been finding that my photoshop performance has been inadequate, especially when using the brush tool. I thought the 5k monitor is taxing the mac mini internal gpu too much.

after a lot of research, i decided to purchase an egpu (with an RX 850 card) and used it indirectly with my mac mini.
surprisingly, i've found that the performance improvement was only minimal.
photoshop does respond slightly faster though my brush issue is still present at times.

i will be returning the egpu, since these things aren't cheap and I found that the improvement wasn't enough.
 
reporting back on my mac mini 2018 with an egpu.
to recap, i have an LG 5k monitor and i have been finding that my photoshop performance has been inadequate, especially when using the brush tool. I thought the 5k monitor is taxing the mac mini internal gpu too much.

after a lot of research, i decided to purchase an egpu (with an RX 850 card) and used it indirectly with my mac mini.
surprisingly, i've found that the performance improvement was only minimal.
photoshop does respond slightly faster though my brush issue is still present at times.

i will be returning the egpu, since these things aren't cheap and I found that the improvement wasn't enough.

what do you mean with ''indirectly?'' Are you using the eGPU in between the Mac Mini and the monitor?
 
Excellent, real world experience trumps my googling.

There are quite a few people on here with recent Mac Minis who reported having no problems with 4K monitors. I only remember their posts because I expected them to have serious lag and was surprised when people reported none.

I had the initial BlackMagic eGPU briefly when it came out, but it did very little for me in the areas where I needed it. It's really hard to predict where that eGPU will and won't help and even when it does help, it's nowhere near the same performance as you'd get if you actually had the same card installed onboard.
 
There are quite a few people on here with recent Mac Minis who reported having no problems with 4K monitors. I only remember their posts because I expected them to have serious lag and was surprised when people reported none.

I had the initial BlackMagic eGPU briefly when it came out, but it did very little for me in the areas where I needed it. It's really hard to predict where that eGPU will and won't help and even when it does help, it's nowhere near the same performance as you'd get if you actually had the same card installed onboard.

That's a shame. You don't happen to know if it boosts graphical performance on an app called ''thinkorswim'' or do you?
 
what do you mean with ''indirectly?'' Are you using the eGPU in between the Mac Mini and the monitor?

hey hessel89, (indirect means) it is not in between the 2 machines, as only the black magic can do that while driving the LG ultrafine 5k. : S
though i am doubting that the black magic was going to make a big difference in photoshop performance.
 
That's a shame. You don't happen to know if it boosts graphical performance on an app called ''thinkorswim'' or do you?

Afraid not. BTW, I don't have a Mini either. I paired a 2016 MBP with the eGPU. Because I wasn't too impressed with my first experience with an eGPU, I upgraded to a 2018 MBP with a Vega 20.

I expected the Minis to struggle more because they don't have a dGPU, but perhaps the iGPUs in them have some decent muscle power. Among the MBP line, the iGPUs in the MBP 13" laptops actually outperform the iGPUs in the 15" laptops. The machines without dGPUs are getting more powerful iGPUs than their better equipped counterparts.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.