El Capitan in old Macs

Discussion in 'OS X El Capitan (10.11)' started by Bromio, Aug 3, 2015.

  1. Bromio macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2014
    #1
    How does El Capitan perform in old Macs? I mean, those without SSD, and with older than Intel iX processor and 4 GB of RAM as a maximum.
     
  2. Evren Carven macrumors regular

    Evren Carven

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2014
    #2
    I am using El Capitan on my Mac mini (Late 2012) with 2.5 GHz Intel Core i5 processor and 4 GB 1333 MHz DDR3 memory. Up to now, I feel it's ok except sometimes freeze and have to restart.
     
  3. MultiFinder17 macrumors 68000

    MultiFinder17

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2008
    Location:
    Tampa, Florida
    #3
    I am running 10.11 on the oldest machine it will support, a mid-2007 MacBook Pro. Mine is a 2.2GHz C2D, 4GB RAM, and I did put an SSD in it a while back. It runs 10.11 like an absolute champ; I haven't noticed any slowdowns that I haven't noticed in the last few versions, and it actually seems to run a bit smoother than 10.10! None too shabby for an 8-year-old notebook :)
     

    Attached Files:

  4. jruschme macrumors 6502

    jruschme

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2011
    Location:
    Brick, NJ
    #4
    I'm running El Capitan on a mid-2009 17" MBP (2.8Ghz C2D) and a mid-2009 13" MBP (2.53Ghz C2D). Both have 8GB RAM and neither has an SSD, though the drive in the 13" is a non-Apple 7200 RPM drive.

    Good performance from both.
     
  5. Bromio thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2014
    #5
    Better performance than in Mavericks? Or equal?
     
  6. MultiFinder17 macrumors 68000

    MultiFinder17

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2008
    Location:
    Tampa, Florida
    #6
    I would say better on my machine, although that could be attributed to it being a fresh install. Either way, it's no worse than Mavericks.
     
  7. redheeler macrumors 603

    redheeler

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2014
    #7
    I would say about the same or maybe a little bit better on my late 2008 MacBook Air, although Mavericks is more of a memory hog than later versions (10.10.3+) on 2 GB RAM so I tend not to use it as much.
     
  8. rdy0329 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2012
    #8
    Running it on a mid 2010 MacBook Pro 13" 4GB RAM. 5400RPM HDD. For day-to-day use its pretty good. I kinda got used to it beach balling from time to time but not to a point that it tests my patience.

    Opening Apps:

    Slow - >10s
    Average - 5-10s
    Fast - <5

    Stock Apps (calendar etc.) - Average
    Safari - Average-Fast
    iWork Apps - Average
    Office 2011 - Average
    Office 2016 - Slow
    iLife/iTunes - Slow-Average
     
  9. Bromio thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2014
    #9
    Thank you. It seems very promising! I've skipped Yosemite because of performance issues, but it looks like it'll be safe to upgrade again.
     
  10. bbfc macrumors 68030

    bbfc

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2011
    Location:
    Newcastle Great Park, England.
    #10
    I'm running El Capitan on an Early-2011 MBP with 4GB RAM and no SSD. Runs pretty well, and as good as Mavericks did. A hell of a lot better than Yosemite.
     
  11. matov macrumors newbie

    matov

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Location:
    Seville
    #11
    I'm running 10.11 on a MBP late 2008, C2D 2,66, 8GB of ram and a custom made fusion drive (SSD + HDD), and it runs really good.
     
  12. deviant macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    #12
    iMac 2007 SSD - better than yosemite
     
  13. Valkyre macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2012
    #13
    I have an Imac 20' mid 2009 with 8GB (no SSD) that I have purposely left with Snow Leopard all this time. I skipped Lion, Mountain Lion, Mavericks, Yosemite... but now, I am thinking if perhaps it is worth to upgrade to El Capitan, based on all the impressions.

    Do you guys think it is safe for me to go ahead and upgrade? I really want to give this machine all the new features since Snow Leopard, but on the other hand I do not want to sacrifice UI smoothness. I hate laggy UI, does anyone with my machine and El Capitan installed can give me an idea on how smooth the UI is on such an old machine?

    Thanks.
     
  14. thekayman macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2014
    #14
    2009 2.66GHz C2D 4GB RAM, 250GB SSD, using the discrete GPU, El Capitan runs so much more smoothly and faster compared to Yosemite. Almost as good as Mavericks.

    Granted, an SSD will make a heck of a difference if you haven't installed one already.
     
  15. deviant macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    #15
    if you were afraid of mavericks i can't see how el cap will be better. on the other hand, it seems crazy to me having a 2009 mac with snow leo, especially you having the iPhones iPads and such.
     
  16. Johnhimm macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2013
    #16
    I am running on 2010 27" iMac i7 and a 2011 Macbook Air i5 - Performance is as good or better than Mavericks and Yosemite.
     
  17. jthesssin macrumors regular

    jthesssin

    Joined:
    May 6, 2013
    Location:
    Matthews NC
    #17
    I was about to search and see if it would run on a 2010 Mac Pro (8 Core with 32 Gb ram and 3Tb Raid drive) but I guess if some are running it on a 2010 dual core mini i should be good to go!
     
  18. Dustman macrumors 65816

    Dustman

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2007
    #18
    Mid 2009 MBP here. Ancient 9400M and still performing beautifully. SSD of course.
     
  19. bmac89 macrumors 65816

    bmac89

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2014
    #19
    I still run Snow Leopard on my main machine and also considering upgrading to El Capitan. If you have enough hard drive space, then I suggest you create a second partition and install El Capitan next to Snow Leopard. This way you can see how it performs before taking the plunge and risking the hassle of downgrading.
     
  20. 76ShovelHead macrumors 6502a

    76ShovelHead

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Location:
    Florida
    #20
    El Cap. running on my Early 2008 Macbook Pro (2.4 GHz, 2 GB Ram, 500 gig HDD). To say the least, it runs better than Yosemite. I still get beachball'd a bit and experience slowdowns, not for long though! 6 gigs of ram and an SSD all but eliminate that.. Not bad at all for $150 bucks on eBay!

    That said I'm running Yosemite on a C2Q OC'd to 3 GHz with 4 gigs of ram and an SSD, same processor generation as this MBP (slightly faster bus speed though) and it runs flawlessly, so I could only imagine 10.11 will perform even better.
     
  21. MJWMac1988, Aug 25, 2015
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2015

    MJWMac1988 macrumors member

    MJWMac1988

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2015
    Location:
    Western Nebraska
  22. tripmusic, Aug 25, 2015
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2015

    tripmusic macrumors 6502

    tripmusic

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2012
    Location:
    MA
    #22
    Running on a late 2008 MBP, C2D 2.4ghz, 4gb ram and a 7200rpm rotational drive. Runs a bit better than Yosemite I believe
     

Share This Page