Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,852
38,508


SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has been embroiled in a battle with Apple over its satellite connectivity features, according to The Information.

iPhone-Satellite-Feature.jpg

The report claims when SpaceX CEO Elon Musk heard that Apple was planning to announce a satellite connectivity feature for the iPhone 14 in partnership with Globalstar, he approached the company with an offer. He proposed that SpaceX would exclusively provide satellite connectivity to iPhones for 18 months, for an upfront cost of $5 billion. After that, Apple would pay SpaceX $1 billion per year for Starlink service.

Musk threatened that if Apple did not agree to a deal with SpaceX within 72 hours, he would announce a similar satellite feature on his own that could work with iPhones. Apple rejected the proposal, and two weeks before the iPhone 14 was announced SpaceX revealed a partnership with T-Mobile that allowed smartphone users to send and receive text messages in areas with no reception using Starlink.

SpaceX has also filed legal challenges to Globalstar's use of the radio spectrum it has licensed, which could cripple the iPhone's satellite service if they succeed. As part of this litigation, SpaceX challenged Globalstar's application to launch new satellites in 2023, accusing the satellite company of underutilizing the spectrum it already possessed. SpaceX accused the company of trying to block competition by hogging spectrum for itself.

SpaceX also named Apple in the regulatory filings, which apparently irked Apple executives who wanted to keep their distance from the conflict. Moreover, Apple employees are said to believe that Musk's close relationship with the Trump administration could give him an advantage over Apple and others with the FCC.

More recently, Apple and SpaceX have clashed over how far Apple would support SpaceX's partnership with T-Mobile. Over the past year, Musk asked Apple to support the T-Mobile satellite feature across a broad range of its iPhone models, which would help maximize the potential market for the service, but Apple was reluctant to support the service on models older than the iPhone 14, which frustrated Musk.

The series of satellite connectivity spats added to animosity between Musk and Apple, who have also grappled with disagreements over App Store fees. In recent years, Musk has plotted the idea of building his own phone to get around Apple's "gatekeeper" position in the market. Musk has reportedly discussed Tesla building the phone and satellite connectivity being provided by Starlink.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: Elon Musk Battled Apple Over Satellite Features
 
Musk tried to extort Apple for services. Apple called his bluff, so now he’s doing it for free.

One can only hope that his corrupt ties to the Trump administration won’t be successful in thwarting competition. He is claiming that the competition isn’t using spectrum so it shouldn’t be allowed to launch satellites to use said spectrum. Ridiculous.
 
He proposed that SpaceX would exclusively provide satellite connectivity to iPhones for 18 months, for an upfront cost of $5 billion. After that, Apple would pay SpaceX $1 billion per year for Starlink service.

More recently, Apple and SpaceX have clashed over how far Apple would support SpaceX's partnership with T-Mobile. Over the past year, Musk asked Apple to support the T-Mobile satellite feature across a broad range of its iPhone models, which would help maximize the potential market for the service, but Apple was reluctant to support the service on models older than the iPhone 14, which frustrated Musk.
Apple should have told Musk that Apple would support the SpaceX and T-Mobile partnership for 18 months if Musk/SpaceX paid Apple an upfront $5 billion and $1 billion per year after that. ;)
 
If they had made a phone a year ago it might’ve had a chance but I think the market, especially Europe, wouldn’t purchase the phones now if Musk is involved. Look at Tesla’s cratering sales in Europe for as close to proof as I can provide for what is a speculative claim.
 
As much as I want Apple to open up their walled garden, tone back the greed, provide better support for older devices, etc, etc... 72 hour ultimatums, exclusivity demands, and punitive lawsuits is not going to win Musk the moral high ground.
So you want Apple’s profits to slide, sales to decrease, all for the sake of being nice? And don’t tell us Apple’s sales and profits will actually increase by being nice. Not hardly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DwayneDwibbley
World's biggest baby gets told no, throws a tantrum.
So musk offered Apple an exclusivity deal which they declined and so he partnered with T-mobile like he said he would. How is it a tantrum? 😂 he launched the satellites for a reason he didn’t make a deal with t-mobile to spite Apple he was always planning to sell a service.

I don’t see anything bad about giving them a deadline it was for exclusivity and he had the best service Apple could get. Apple didn’t decline it because it wasn’t the best option. They declined it because they were afraid of making a deal with SpaceX that would piss off the cellular carriers.

Ultimately Apple chose to give us a hobbled version of satellite features that works in emergencies instead of full satellite connectivity (in emergencies).
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.