Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Come On all of you

How many times has an ignorant PC using goober bashed a Mac because it was different? A LOT! Remember the guy who called us satanic? (i'm Catholic to) I thought that we had started to shy away from these ignorant articles. I hope this doesnt get over 2 pages!
 
AmigoMac said:
I won't even read the article, they always compare apples to bananas...
What do you expect from a bunch of PC using monkies.
attachment.php
 
AmigoMac said:
I won't even read the article, they always compare apples to bananas...


well then you have no right to comment on it because if you had read the artical you would of noticed that he only complains about the emac. He says the imac ibook and above are all good computers but for the price the emac is pretty crappy in today standards. when it came out yeah it was good but now it is over price.
 
Timelessblur said:
well then you have no right to comment on it because if you had read the artical you would of noticed that he only complains about the emac. He says the imac ibook and above are all good computers but for the price the emac is pretty crappy in today standards. when it came out yeah it was good but now it is over price.

Now, including the iBook and iMac, you are going apple to apples ;) ... Bute PCs in the mixture... :roleyes: yeah, pretty crappy, fugly design, what the H*ll is OS X ? ohh, wait, never mind, I have a lot of dells at work and I'm so pleased to be back at home with my eMac.
 
Eric_Z said:
Meh... there are far "worse" desktops out there, just take a look at the SUN Blade 150 for example. Yeah I know that they claim that it's a "workstation", but come on... [and I actually like SUNs] For $1,395.00 you get:

UltraSPARC-IIi Processor: ____1 @ 550 MHz
On-Chip L2 Cache: __________512 KB
Graphics Accelerator:_______Sun PGX64
Memory: _________________256 MB (1 @ 256-MB DIMM)
7200 RPM EIDE Disk Drive:___ 1 @ 80 GB
Ethernet Port: _____ _______ 1 @ 10/100BASE-T
USB Port: _________________4
IEEE 1394 Port: ____________2
Parallel Port: _____________ 1
Serial Port: _______________1
32-Bit PCI Slot:_____________3 @ 33 MHz
Floppy Drive: ______________1
16X DVD-ROM Drive :________1
Smart Card Reader: _________1
Office Productivity Suite:_____StarOffice 6.0 Pre-Installed
Operating System:___________Solaris 8 & 9 Pre-Installed

How is it not a workstation?? I know of no one that uses a Sun machine for a desktop. And what is so bad about it for that price? The chip speed?
 
Maybe it is me, but I question why any computer buyer (except the truly hardcore game player) would buy a computer to play games on. It is far cheaper to buy the latest game box and software, than to try to keep up with computer hardware to do the same.
 
Those articles always hit hardest to the owners. I think I'll return my eMac. Apparently it's the crappiest computer around. You know what, I'll just through it out the window. I have the consolation of having extra RAM and a DVD burner... but then, I've only used the DVD burner twice, so, well, I may as well throw it out the window. Ya, and OS X.3? What's with that useless program? It never crashes... is it actually an OS, or just some weird hardware fakeout? And it came with all the free software that an iMac has... I think I'll just delete it. Oh, and it looks good. Yes. I think it looks good. It's not a flat panel. Well, anyway, have a nice day. I won't be talking with you for a while, as I'm throwing my eMac out the window (as I've mentioned). I'll find out an old PC or dig out my iMac 233, though they are utter junk too.
 
AdamR01 said:
How is it not a workstation?? I know of no one that uses a Sun machine for a desktop. And what is so bad about it for that price? The chip speed?

The defenition that I use for a workstation, and the one that Wikipedia uses, is:

A computer workstation, often colloquially referred to as workstation, is a hign-end general-purpose microcomputer designed to be used by one person at a time and which offers higher performance than normally found in a personal computer, especially with respect to graphics, processing power and the ability to carry out several tasks at the same time.

Now I've used a SUN 150 at uni, and it's nothing of the above.
 
For less then a grand, look at the computer your getting......Its a great computer for education and basic users, Not everyone can afford a $5,000 dual 2.5 GHZ G5 with 2 gigs of ram... :rolleyes:
 
under the current price the artical is making it the emac is pretty crap for it price end of story. 6 months ago it was a good price for it.

Comuputer loose there value extermly quitcly for example my computer I built this summer I spent around 1500 for it including the OS. in less than 6 month the computer was worth around 750 bucks. mind you that the computer is still stonger than any imac you can buy or even upgraded mind you that price is or tower only. that is the point it trying to make the emac now is aworth around 500 maybe 600 tops but it price at around 800 apple does not upgrade it offen enough to keep up with tech. if you jsut bought you emac in the past 2 months or so I am sorry but you got rip off. nhow if you got it over the summer stop your complaining the emac was a good deal then.
 
miloblithe said:
Until the most recent G5 iMacs, the emac was pretty comparable to the iMac, just with a CRT instead of flat screen. In fact, at certain points it has been more powerful than the iMac, and it's so much cheaper. If rumors prove to be true and a G5 eMac is due in the next few months, I will once again argue that the eMac is a much better computer for the money than an iMac (depending on how price/specs shake out).

I agree 100% with the above.

However, seeing as how the current eMac truly IS a p.o.s., I think we should cut the writer some slack. The eMac isn't a modern computer, not even compared to other low price computers. As a desktop, it should at least beat out a low end iBook. Too bad the iBook is a much better deal, and I wonder why anyone would buy an eMac over an iBook if they're interested in a low cost Apple computer for the home.

But yeah, usually the eMac is the best deal Apple gives it's customers, especially compared to the iMac, which is usually just a stylized eMac, essentially.
 
Eric_Z said:
Now I've used a SUN 150 at uni, and it's nothing of the above.

Well that definitely is one of Sun's cheapest workstations. Im sure it has its uses. You can't really run Solaris on anything other than their machines (yes I know there is an x86 version but it's quite picky about hardware). We'll just have to agree to disagree.
 
yes maybe the eMac is the worst mac (now) but if you need a cheap entry level mac for surfing office and stuff like that (not everyone is a gamer :p) its perfect, you get a combo drive, USB2 & FireWire you can BTO a bigger harddisk and ram BT Airport and get it with Superdrive... so maybe the cheapest eMac is crap because Apple puts not enoug standard ram in the machines...(this counts for allmost every mac I think, just the minimum for OSX...)

but one thing in favor of mac to pc: no virusses, it just works, maybe that should be the new slogan for '2005 Apple, it just works ;)'
last weekend I had to setup Wireless lan at a friend and he was complaining about his PC getting slower and slower even without istalling new stuuf and virusses and so on, I told him: I never have virusses, my mac doesn't slow itself down, I don't reinstall it every 6months like I did with my pc... his eyes opened, and I think he'll be getting a mac as next computer :p
 
kingjr3 said:
For a second there, I thought it was named worst desktop PC, because it didn't hold up to the standard of all other PCs which include security exploits, spyware, and viruses.

While I agree with some of the points there, but I would defend with the fact that the eMac is an educational product turned consumer because of demand for CRT all-in-ones. Was never really designed for the public.

Indeed.
I have over 100 of them new this year, and I think they are astounding. 1GB ram, DVD-RW all for about $1,200.00, which includes Final Cut Express and Keynote. GB NIC cards make them pretty potent machines too.
It might be APPLE'S worst desktop, but look what your comparing it to. It's like saying the Maserati E3B model is the worst Maserati! Now, on to an eMachine......
 
puckhead193 said:
For less then a grand, look at the computer your getting......Its a great computer for education and basic users, Not everyone can afford a $5,000 dual 2.5 GHZ G5 with 2 gigs of ram... :rolleyes:

True there. They recently had an educational deal for the 1Ghz models in packs of 5 for just over $600.00.
 
Abstract said:
However, seeing as how the current eMac truly IS a p.o.s., I think we should cut the writer some slack. .


Finally, some common sense in this thread. I saw the review in this month's issue and I realized.. this guy is right on the money. The eMac sucks it, hard.
I can't believe anyone in this forum would defend that machine... a year ago, yeh.. but come on - it is so outdated now.
 
As a home desktop for normal use he is right the eMac is not that good, but if Grandma and the kids want soemthing to learn on, web browse, email and forums then the eMac will do the job. Like someone said this is ment for education and people who dont need the extra CPU power.

Its liek saying my $15,000 car is teh worst because i cant take it to the racing trake.
 
Eric_Z said:
Meh... there are far "worse" desktops out there, just take a look at the SUN Blade 150 for example. Yeah I know that they claim that it's a "workstation", but come on... [and I actually like SUNs] For $1,395.00 you get:

UltraSPARC-IIi Processor: ____1 @ 550 MHz
On-Chip L2 Cache: __________512 KB
Graphics Accelerator:_______Sun PGX64
Memory: _________________256 MB (1 @ 256-MB DIMM)
7200 RPM EIDE Disk Drive:___ 1 @ 80 GB
Ethernet Port: _____ _______ 1 @ 10/100BASE-T
USB Port: _________________4
IEEE 1394 Port: ____________2
Parallel Port: _____________ 1
Serial Port: _______________1
32-Bit PCI Slot:_____________3 @ 33 MHz
Floppy Drive: ______________1
16X DVD-ROM Drive :________1
Smart Card Reader: _________1
Office Productivity Suite:_____StarOffice 6.0 Pre-Installed
Operating System:___________Solaris 8 & 9 Pre-Installed
To me, what weighs this system down the most are the slow PCI slots. Everything else appears to be typical for a low-end Sun system. Keep in mind that Sun CPUs perform just as well as other CPUs that run at about 3 to 4 times the clock speed.

EDIT: The part underlined is NOT true - disregard it.
 
The eMac... Note the "e" in that.

As posted in the thread it's primarliy designed for education, it wasn't even available to the public originally.

The educational discout offsets some of the price/power ratio comments, we can pick up a base model for £480 GBP, for that money it's still a nice little machine for those users who need WP, web-access, mail, etc.

Plus it'll run Reason and Logic Express pretty handily for learning applications, and it'll even get a decent run at ProTools LE and Final Cut (if you don't mind the render times).

On top of all that, it runs OSX.... which makes it better than ANY Winblows machine ever built. ;) :D

(Nods to Linux users in a friendly manner)

Not everyone needs ultimate gaming performance, not everyone plays games. My sister has been making DVD's on her eMac for a year now and won't ever buy another PC. She wanted to play games, she bought an PS2.

NO computer is the be-all-and-end-all, I can't fit a DP G5 and 30" Cinema Display into my backpack, therefore it's a crap machine, give me a Sony Viao sub-notebook anyday... :D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.