Sound great in theory...
but honestly I would be worried about safety. Do I want electromagnetic radiation strong enough to charge a phone flying through my house or car that I am exposed to continuously? I don't think so personally.
Can't believe these people aren't concerned about wearing Earpods for 8 hours a day, beaming that wireless radiation directly into their brains!!
I'm genuinely concerned with yet another type of "wave" bouncing around inside my house. And call me one of those "get off my lawn" types - but would we really know how safe it is now? Or in 10/20/30 years after it's been used a long time.
I bet if the internet was around back in the 50's people would've said the same about smoking...It's a bit silly to be living in fear.
We have a longer life expectancy now than we did back in the day and that's despite the fact that we have much more "hazards" coming at us everywhere we go.
People make issues out of anything and unfortunately with the internet, you can find an article backing any agenda you're trying to push.
I can find you articles that say water is bad for you and some idiots probably believe it.
that doesn't stop people turning their wifi off at night though does it, or refusing to wear bluetooth headphones cos of zapping it straight to their (borderline useless) brains.
For this to work the way it needs to Apple needs widespread adoption - they need transmitters everywhere
Cue the concerns about how this might affect our physical health (yes, in my ignorance, I think I'm one of those who's concerned).
The video was the biggest waste of 60 seconds I've ever spent. I want to smack that jerk.The video ad is horrible. Hopefully their product must be good considering Apple is buying their technology.
Hopefully Apple will implement this with the 2017 iPhone(s). It might be too late, but either way this will make it into all future Apple products since it is the future of charging.
Top 5 consumer electronics?
Samsung, Apple, Sony, Toshiba, Intel, Panasonic, Hitachi, HP, Microsoft? Could be any of those. Very cool if Apple but there are lots of options that are not Apple.
Your silly attempt at equivalence is like saying you could fill an ocean with a thimble of water.Oh boy... Don't go outside then. There's radiation from the sun.
Don't buy a cell phone then because that's radiation.
I wouldn't worry, we literally are surrounded with multiple sources of radio waves emitting them at us constantly. Radio stations, wifi, cell towers, outer-space. If I remember the science, and someone please correct me, The wave is too short to do damage and just passes through us harmlessly.
You, me, we all get blasted with far worse waves from space quite frequently.
On topic: MY BODY IS SOOOOOO READY FOR WIFI CHARGING!!!
If true.. this is some seriously exciting news..... barring people health concerns.
Sound great in theory...
but honestly I would be worried about safety. Do I want electromagnetic radiation strong enough to charge a phone flying through my house or car that I am exposed to continuously? I don't think so personally.
It doesn't matter how long it takes to charge the device, forget running the phone to 10% and then plugging it in, the idea is you'll trickle charge it ALL the time no matter which room you're in with a transmitter, it should be slow, but just fast enough to continue to charge the phone in a positive manner when in heavy use, thats all thats needed, to keep it topped up, not fast charge it from 0.
You mostly remember your science correctly. RF (Radio Frequency) waves are too *long* to do damage.
Radio waves don't usually pass through us; they are absorbed. However, the waves do not have enough energy to do damage; they only warm us very slightly. It's exactly the same mechanism by which you feel warm when sitting next to an incandescent light bulb.
Not until waves get short enough to get past the UV range do they start causing damage. Shorter waves have more energy, and UV and shorter waves can start to knock atoms about in our cells, including DNA, which is where the damage comes from.
Everything visible light and longer is harmless though.
THAT SAID, though...
Wireless charging is inefficient, and not likely to work very well. RF is great for transmitting information, but not so much for energy. The inverse square law comes into play; available power drops sharply as you move further away from the transmitter. The power required might damage other equipment in the path of the signal, not to mention interference. No thanks, really.
Inductive charging is much more efficient; IE laying your phone on a charging mat. But even that is only a fraction as efficient as a simple wire connection.
It's a bit silly to be living in fear.
We have a longer life expectancy now than we did back in the day and that's despite the fact that we have much more "hazards" coming at us everywhere we go.
People make issues out of anything and unfortunately with the internet, you can find an article backing any agenda you're trying to push.
I can find you articles that say water is bad for you and some idiots probably believe it.