I'm not sure if this is a repost (most likely), but it does bring up an interesting point.
http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/18/editorial-ten-reasons-why-windows-mobile-6-5-misses-the-mark/
Symbian (through Nokia's efforts), Android via Google, OSX Mobile on the iPhones, Palm's WebOS, RIM's Blackberry OS and Windows Mobile 6.5 all represent what is coming up next.
Symbian is going to be very interesting moving forward, but it is already built into a very large number of phones via Nokia's lower end handsets.
The truly interesting phones seem to be coming built with Android, OS X Mobile, WebOS, and RIM's Blackberry OS.
What market segment is Windows Mobile really targeted at?
http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/18/editorial-ten-reasons-why-windows-mobile-6-5-misses-the-mark/
Symbian (through Nokia's efforts), Android via Google, OSX Mobile on the iPhones, Palm's WebOS, RIM's Blackberry OS and Windows Mobile 6.5 all represent what is coming up next.
Symbian is going to be very interesting moving forward, but it is already built into a very large number of phones via Nokia's lower end handsets.
The truly interesting phones seem to be coming built with Android, OS X Mobile, WebOS, and RIM's Blackberry OS.
What market segment is Windows Mobile really targeted at?