Engadget review of iPod Nano

Discussion in 'iPod' started by LoganT, Sep 7, 2010.

  1. phobic99 macrumors 6502a

    phobic99

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    #2
    It makes the 5th gen Nano look really good too. I may actually get one now since my Sansa Clip got washed. Although, I could buy nearly 3 of those for the price of a Nano.

    Hmm...

    But anyway, nice of Apple to remove a lot of features to make it smaller and add a touchscreen while charging pretty much the same price. :) I'll be honest though and say it'll be interesting to see what kind of watchband type accessories get released.
     
  2. iEvolution macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    #3
    LOL@ the comment that the touch screen is actually better for eyes free navigation over the click wheel. Give me a break, who wrote that stupid review?

    The screen is so small it can only fit like what 4 or 5 entries on the screen at a time?
     
  3. LoganT thread starter macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    #4
    I'd actually argue that with the screen so small it's not hard to guess where to put your fingers to control something.
     
  4. iEvolution macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    #5
    That might be true, but from experience of its older brother [touch] against both the nano and classic it doesn't hold true for the touch.

    I also don't like how the information isn't even displayed on the now playing screen without touching it.
     
  5. izimzis macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2010
    #6
    what i dont get is that they say there are no games but clearly i can see a game icon on the last page...
     
  6. redshot macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2008
    #7
    it says genres... not games
     
  7. HarryKeogh macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2008
    #8
    I just picked up a new iPod Nano (well, ordered one from Amazon). I only bought it to use with my workouts (I like using the Nike+). Clip > Armband. Put my 3rd Gen iPod touch on eBay.
     
  8. hcho3 macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    May 13, 2010
    #9
    I agree with engadget's review on iPod touch, but I disagree with iPod nano review. The score is little bit too high. It should be 7 out of 10. The iPod nano is priced too high. It an ipod shuffle with a screen. But, it's priced at three times more.
     

Share This Page