Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yeah, and no one including Apple or the AI industry really knows how it pans out. I normally prefer long ownerships, but this time around I believe I`ll go more or less base spec and shorter period. I don`t think hedging for the future will be the best thing to do at present. Interesting to observe people selling off their M1 Mini 16/256 and 16/512 asking for more than the M4 with same config and way higher spec/performance costs.

Actually, I think this is the way.

If you're comfortable with reselling, then late-model Macs seem to sell for a good chunk of what you paid after 1-2 years of use. I had an M2 Air for close to a year and sold it for about $200 less than I bought it for. Sure, I 'burned' the $200, but I also had the use of the Mac for a year.

Building it for the long term or 'future-proofing' doesn't make sense because of what Apple charges for upgrades. Increasing RAM and SSD addshundreds to the cost of a new Mac, and you just don't get those dollars back on resale - especially if you keep the machine a long time. I'm not going to bitch at Apple's cost for RAM and SSD costs because no one is compelled to pay them. Apple is a for-profit company and, as I learned in business school, there is no such thing as unreasonable profit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InnocenceMyth
People underestimate or either lie about what you can do on a 8GB ram Mac. 8GB may be low but you can still do a lot. I can run either Premiere Pro or Photoshop or Lightroom, Safari with 8-10 tabs, MS Office with 4 documents, FB messenger, Apple Mail.

And when I open up Activity Monitor, Safari is what eats up the most RAM. You have to do a force quit on Safari every week or so just to refresh the cache or (unless you shut down each day) it will just eat more ram over time. And people complain about Chrome, Safari isn't any better for hogging RAM.
 
What is really interesting is that the Air was also bumped to 16GB RAM without much fanfare. It seems, that very soon, 8GB won't be enough to run the latest AI models locally.
 
Last edited:
People underestimate or either lie about what you can do on a 8GB ram Mac. 8GB may be low but you can still do a lot. I can run either Premiere Pro or Photoshop or Lightroom, Safari with 8-10 tabs, MS Office with 4 documents, FB messenger, Apple Mail.

And when I open up Activity Monitor, Safari is what eats up the most RAM. You have to do a force quit on Safari every week or so just to refresh the cache or (unless you shut down each day) it will just eat more ram over time. And people complain about Chrome, Safari isn't any better for hogging RAM.
I have clients that have the M1 iMac with 8GB. They do 4K video editing and photoshop. Works fine for them. No memory pressure issues.
 
I have clients that have the M1 iMac with 8GB. They do 4K video editing and photoshop. Works fine for them. No memory pressure issues.

Exactly. So these people who say that 8GB isn't enough to even run the OS are full of crap. I purposely bought the base model because I refuse to be another victim of the Apple tax and I got mine on sale with a decent discount because I know Apple MSRPs are over inflated. if I need to edit a movie production then I have my desktop with 128GB ram. I only render out simple videos on the Air and it's more than capable with 8GB and Im still able to keep my other programs open.

Safari is the biggest memory hog of them all, that's right Apples own browser. It's just as bad as Chrome. Keep your same websites open for 4 or 5 days without shutting the laptop down and each website will consume 1.5+GB of ram EACh.
 
And well over 80% of all Mac users will never utilize it. Well, maybe once. A few may run a benchmark.
Hallmark of bad punditry: statistics pulled out of the derriere and condescending attitude toward others

THEY watch bad movies and don't read. THEY are horrible drivers who text while driving. THEY don't do anything on their computers but email and browsing (as if the modem browser isn't one of the biggest memory hogs around).
 
I just hope they don’t make software even sloppier and more bloated with establishing 16gb as new baseline and leaving people who bought devices recently in the dust
 
No PC company has moved to 32gb standard other than in gaming laptops.

That's an empty claim because most PC company's "standard" laptops are $500 flying bricks. You can probably find them with 4GB if you look... Apple simply doesn't have a dog in that race.

Look at any premium "ultrabook"-type PC with a remotely comparable price-, spec- or brand-wise to - say - a M4 MacBook Pro and 32GB of LPDDR5 is not hard to find (often with 1TB SSD as well) e.g.


...all of those come with 32GB LPDDR5X and by the time you're spending over $1500 they come with 1TB SSD. Where you can't find models with 32GB base, the upgrade is often cheaper - Lenovo wants about $200 for an extra 32GB (Apple still wants $200-per-8GB for upgrades)

It's true that Apple's bump to 16GB base has levelled the playing field a lot and it's nowhere near as ridiculous as it was a week ago - they've just about caught up, but they're hardly ahead of the game and they're still charging a ludicrous rate for upgrades.
 
great. then buy a PC.
Why would I need to buy a PC? Macs come with 16GB by default now. You’re the one complaining about the RAM amount in new Macs, not me.

On what level does your reply make any sort of sense? Should I tell you to buy a PC so that you can have a machine with 8GB of ram? Because it makes just as much sense as you saying it to me.
 
Because 8gb is no longer an option for anyone now that Apple Intelligence is part of MacOS. It simply would not work with that little RAM, AI models take up a lot of space.

I hope 16GB still feels like a lot of RAM, because that's what my M4 mini I preordered has. I am going to assume Apple learned from their mistake last time around... because no, you are actually wrong... 8GB was never enough. It was the absolute bare minimum to have a machine that runs at all. That's different from being enough. The thing is, Apple Silicon is so fast you can't tell when it's swapping between the RAM and the SSD... but it's still bad that it has to do it.
4 GB was not enough for Mac OS in 2020, and 8 GB was the next step up. It was not Cook being benevolent.
 
The real issue behind the smoke is people simply want to pay less/get more--a complaint as old as time that will continue on forever.

The real issue was - and still is - the $200-per-8GB upgrade charge which is totally disproportionate to the actual cost of LPDDR5x RAM. As per my earlier post, for example, Lenovo want $200 for a 32GB to 64GB LPDDR5X upgrade on a Thinkpad.

8GB may be fine for some people, but some people do need more (and some people will need more than 16GB) and Apple wants a small fortune for what should be a fairly minor upgrade.

Upgrading the old $600 Mac Mini to a relatively modest 16GB/512GB SSD config cost an extra $400 - more than half the cost of the machine. For an extra 8GB of LPDDR5x and an extra 256GB of flash. Probably about $100 retail in extra parts - and about twice what most other PC makers would charge for the same upgrade.

Now you get 16GB base, so you just need $200 - only 1/3 of the price of the machine - to bring the storage up to something practical for serious use. Whoop.

With Apple it's not so much "I want to pay less and get more" it's "When I pay more I don't want to get fleeced".
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.