Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,727
39,664


Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney today commented on Apple's Find My service, referring to it as "super creepy surveillance tech" that "shouldn't exist."

FindMy-Feature.jpg

Sweeney went on to explain that several years ago, "a kid" stole a Mac laptop out of his car. Years later, Sweeney was checking Find My, and as the Mac was still connected to his Apple ID account, it showed him the location where the thief lived.


Sweeney's take is curious, because providing the location of a lost or stolen device is exactly what the Find My service is meant to do. Apple devices remain tied to a user's account if not removed, a feature that is meant to thwart theft.


After confusion from his Twitter followers over his comments, Sweeney said that the location of a device in someone's possession can't be tracked without tracking the person, and "people have a right to privacy." He claims that detection and recovery of a lost or stolen device should be "mediated by due process of law" and not exposed to the device owner "in vigilante fashion."

When Sweeney saw how Find My worked, he said he turned off the feature on all of his devices.

While Apple's AirTag item trackers have been criticized for their use by stalkers, the Find My service has not been the target of similar complaints. Find My and Activation Lock have been important theft deterrents, cutting down on iPhone theft. Apple recently expanded Activation Lock to include iPhone components to prevent them from being disassembled for parts.

Article Link: Apple's Find My Is 'Super Creepy Surveillance Tech' That Shouldn't Exist, Says Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney
 
Last edited:
Sweeney: "I know where my stolen laptop is! That is a bad thing." WTAF is wrong with this guy.

For second hand computers you should always ensure find my is disabled on it. IIRC it will have an activation lock on it if the original owner did not do this. Once disabled the original owner has no way to track you. There is no issue here.
 
Next let’s see his rant on LoJack! The premise that someone’s right to privacy extends past criminal activity, aside from due process is relatively mind boggling, especially because the victims right to property would supersede the criminals right to privacy as they are assuming the loss of privacy since the stolen property can be tracked. Similar to how you have no right to privacy in a public space. By being in a public space you are essentially giving up any potential right to privacy with regard to things you are visibly doing there.
 
Why is this troll still using Apple products at all? He hates Apple, he hates everything Apple does... why is he using their products? Beyond that, I think the key takeaway here is that Tim Sweeney has so much money he considers Apple devices disposable, and he doesn't care if they are stolen, so... go steal from Tim Sweeney. He doesn't mind. He even just made it public he keeps the tracking features turned off.
 
If true (probably not...) imagine a prolific CEO having a computer stolen, seemingly not have any lock because else the thief would stop charging the device, and then just let it access his iCloud for YEARS.

I know he owns the company he runs so he's safe I guess. A board would have him fired for being that stupid.
 
Tim is in a privileged position to be able to easily dismiss this.

My friends elderly mom had her phone stolen at a restaurant. He immediately locked it and was able to track the location to a hotel a 30 mins away from them - all using Find My. He was able to call the hotel and they were able to confirm that they had the phone in their possession.

If you either lose or have your device stolen, you are entitled to get your property back. Has nothing to do with due process as this isn’t a legal proceeding. You don’t want to get tracked? Don’t steal the device.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.