Thats.... not how that worksSo in other words, we will put fortnite back in the AppStore as soon as we can take 100% of the profits. What a scummy company…
Thats.... not how that worksSo in other words, we will put fortnite back in the AppStore as soon as we can take 100% of the profits. What a scummy company…
It’s not a public company 🙄Yes. Epic is a publicly owned company and you can most likely find their quarterly results in their investors relations page. You can examine their financials and get insights into their operations, costs, profits and losses.
That’s what epic want. They want to use their own payment system that bypasses apples 30%Thats.... not how that works
Stop saying they didn’t pay, they did just like every other developer 🙄I couldn’t say it better. You explained it perfectly. It is mind boggling to me how some people think it’s ok to use someone else’s platform but not feel like they need to pay anything for the privilege. Do these people live in apartments where they don’t need to pay money to their landlords? I know for sure I receive a bill for my mortgage every single month. I know the reality I live in.
Please stop saying there weren’t found to be a monopoly, the judge had no opinion other than to say Epic failed to prove it.Given that the ruling is that Apple is not a monopoly, I believe Apple can deny Epic in their store for whatever reason they feel like. I may be wrong, not a legal expert. But I believe that if they just happen to think Sweeney is a d**k, they don’t have to sell his products.
I’ll be that guy: Imagine this fight if Steve was still alive…
It’s been my understanding that all apple has ever required for them to be reinstated is that they remove the offending code. Well now their code doesn’t break the rules.I think they want their app back on the App Store. Apple probably won’t allow it yet. They tired in South Korea after the ruling but Apple said no.
It’s been my understanding that all apple has ever required for them to be reinstated is that they remove the offending code. Well now their code doesn’t break the rules.
Really? The court says otherwise. Hence the judgment.Stop saying they didn’t pay, they did just like every other developer 🙄
Yeah, I think you'd better. I honestly have no idea what you're on about.
I am being perfectly clear. Can’t help you if you don’t understand them.
As the judge who presided over this recent case says, “Success is not illegal”. That should address first part of your company without further explanation.That's where you're wrong.
Not in the US. I don't know which country you live in. Like, Apple has clearly higher margins on phones than their competitors.
Lemme give you an example: There are two gas stations across from each other near me, and they have different prices, which are adjusted at will. One is a Chevron, and its price even differs from another Chevron nearby. If they were all the same, I'd be suspicious of price-fixing.
Really, man? Are you serious with your comments? Epic is a publicly traded company. You can buy Epic stocks, can’t you? What do you think that’s called?
Your example has holes. Reason for typical rich customer to treat the cashier bad is because of their sense of superiority. These people are generally educated and they know very well how to be civilized and proper when they have people equal to their perceived level. Comparatively, a Walmart customer can be nasty due to their lack of education or simply not having the proper lifestyle for good manners. They are rude because of their lifestyle. Totally different reasons.You're not, actually. I showed the ridiculousness of your cashier example, and you had no rational response to that, so you bailed with some nonsensical excuse about not being able to talk publicly about the issue all of a sudden.
Apple still requires Epic to agree to App Store guidelines, particularly the app review process. Epic refuses even to date. Therefore, Apple doesn’t let them back in.It’s been my understanding that all apple has ever required for them to be reinstated is that they remove the offending code. Well now their code doesn’t break the rules.
Your example has holes. Reason for typical rich customer to treat the cashier bad is because of their sense of superiority. These people are generally educated and they know very well how to be civilized and proper when they have people equal to their perceived level. Comparatively, a Walmart customer can be nasty due to their lack of education or simply not having the proper lifestyle for good manners. They are rude because of their lifestyle. Totally different reasons.
The burden of proof is on the plaintiff. Courts ruled Epic could not prove their monopoly claim. Therefore, Apple cannot be ruled to be a monopoly.Please stop saying there weren’t found to be a monopoly, the judge had no opinion other than to say Epic failed to prove it.
The EU tech scene isn't enticing. There's a reason everything is made here or even in China.