Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
day I might be forced to use a certain store to install a certain app for some mandatory procedure
Yeah - imagine how much more it sucks if you’re forced to use a certain store for all of your apps.

to install a certain app for some mandatory procedure that might require biometric reading
What are you talking about?
Just use don’t use that app, if you’re unhappy with providing biometric readings?!
 
What are you talking about?
I barely trust Apple with my data. I will never trust some shoddy corps like Epic to provide apps that I would have to install on my device in case when some app publisher decides to publish only on 3rd party store (because they need to use hidden API that Apple prohibits).

Also, I won’t be protected from naïve users installing apps from shady app stores. How that might affect me? Well, their compromised app version will still communicate with the version installed on my device, which makes my device open for an attack without me even realising it. You might say, this might happen even using the apps from Apple App Store, and you would be right. But Apple at least is forced to do the best they can to protect users because they have a lot more at stake than some shoddy App Store being run by some scammers like epic.

I would love to have an ability on my device to block and not see any communication from devices running apps from 3rd party app stores
 
Just a side-bar to the complexity of Apple’s App Store.



I had an old app I made for demonstration purposes on 2017 and finally got around to getting it out there. Android was easy if you are an organization (if not its a pain to be a dev there now). Just a one time fee of 25 bucks and you are good to go.



Apple charges you 100 bucks a year and huge fees on free apps if they get over a million downloads or so. Anyway I run two not-for-profits so I applied that way to avoid the fees. Getting my mortgage for the first time was easier that dealing with Apple! You had to be on Dun and Bradstreet. Then you had to submit your passport and drivers licence to validate yourself. Then all the documentation of the not for profit. Then more documentation of the not for profit. Then finally, a phone call to speak with Apple representatives directly.


Apple gets cudos for doing business in the States instead of farming it out to India. Everything is like business hours central time. They called me from Texas even though they claim they are based in California - what up with that? Anyway, after three weeks I got my “fee free” dev account and the representative on the phone said congrats - and it did feel like winning the lottery after all that hassle.



Now - when you get the account the terms of service must be well over 200 pages of legal terminology. Just out of curiosity I tried to scroll to the end - and it would not end!



Anyway that was my experience with Apple and becoming a dev…. I can see why the whole Epic stuff goes on forever!
 
I barely trust Apple with my data. I will never trust some shoddy corps like Epic to provide apps that I would have to install on my device in case when some app publisher decides to publish only on 3rd party store (because they need to use hidden API that Apple prohibits).

Also, I won’t be protected from naïve users installing apps from shady app stores. How that might affect me? Well, their compromised app version will still communicate with the version installed on my device, which makes my device open for an attack without me even realising it. You might say, this might happen even using the apps from Apple App Store, and you would be right. But Apple at least is forced to do the best they can to protect users because they have a lot more at stake than some shoddy App Store being run by some scammers like epic.

I would love to have an ability on my device to block and not see any communication from devices running apps from 3rd party app stores
Again, someone whose argument depends on the alternative app stores being “shoddy” and run by “scammers,” as if there is no other legitimate company that could run a store selling digital goods competently and without scamming people. 🙄
 
Just a side-bar to the complexity of Apple’s App Store.



I had an old app I made for demonstration purposes on 2017 and finally got around to getting it out there. Android was easy if you are an organization (if not its a pain to be a dev there now). Just a one time fee of 25 bucks and you are good to go.



Apple charges you 100 bucks a year and huge fees on free apps if they get over a million downloads or so. Anyway I run two not-for-profits so I applied that way to avoid the fees. Getting my mortgage for the first time was easier that dealing with Apple! You had to be on Dun and Bradstreet. Then you had to submit your passport and drivers licence to validate yourself. Then all the documentation of the not for profit. Then more documentation of the not for profit. Then finally, a phone call to speak with Apple representatives directly.


Apple gets cudos for doing business in the States instead of farming it out to India. Everything is like business hours central time. They called me from Texas even though they claim they are based in California - what up with that? Anyway, after three weeks I got my “fee free” dev account and the representative on the phone said congrats - and it did feel like winning the lottery after all that hassle.



Now - when you get the account the terms of service must be well over 200 pages of legal terminology. Just out of curiosity I tried to scroll to the end - and it would not end!



Anyway that was my experience with Apple and becoming a dev…. I can see why the whole Epic stuff goes on forever!
So if was to demo an app, and you spent $25 on an Android release why not just sit back and go with that to show people it worked on a phone?

To say you had to jump through so many hoops with Apple seems like a waste of your time.

Perhaps if you had tested it and received a good response just pay the $99 and roll it out properly?
That's hardly a killer fee even for something non profit. :)
 
That is the weird thing. I mean, I have seen your avatar and all that. A lot of people are feeling in the walled Apple garden safe and secure and comfortable. And that there will be a place outside the walled garden which wouldn't always be safe and sound and pretty makes you afraid, afraid that things will come over the wall into your pretty and safe garden.

And the way Apple implements those rules also play into the narrative. Instead of imlementing is in a good faith and saying, everything is good, this won't comprimise iOS security, Apple is doing the exact opposite, emphazising that it is dangerous to walk outside the walled garden.

Apple could have make this good and safe and leave users the choice to have their devices in the walled garden, to be in the walled garden and outside and to be completely outside of the walls. That what a good company would have done. Make a thing which is apparently scary for some, less so. Apple had a choice, and they choose scare tacticts and doubt.

And that is what makes this discussion also deeply political. And this also why my ahistorical comaparison with feudalism is wrong and not helpful.

Apple tried to sell people an illusion of a clean, nice, perfect garden, which was a mall all along. It is time for Apple and iOS to come back into a walkable downtown, with green spaces, shops, third places, a lot of other things. yeah, it is not always clean. grafiti everywhere and not all shops are good. but your old shops are not gone, they are still there, still the quality and safety. There is nothing here what should you make afraid. Hey look even the sun is shining.
This post feels like it should have started with "once upon a time..." as it was all fantasy story and no facts.

You've already crafted the "happy ever after" ending.
 
  • Like
Reactions: strongy
Good for customers waiting to play the game.
they could play it before when Epic played by the rules.

isnt it odd that a game dev who for a living writes code based on rules in an artificial closed environment cant seem to do the same on the platform they run it on?
 
  • Like
Reactions: strongy
Also, I won’t be protected from naïve users installing apps from shady app stores. How that might affect me? Well, their compromised app version will still communicate with the version installed on my device, which makes my device open for an attack without me even realising it.
You know that people have been buying software for Macs outside of (and well before the existence of) Apple’s Mac App Store? Why has that worked just fine? Have there been numerous examples on Macs of the situation that you describe? Why not?

You sound to me like Chicken Little, but there is no reason to believe that the sky is falling.
 
So players of Fortnite who won't buy Fortbux or whatever will be subsidised by players who do buy the bux, the .50 euro technology fee I mean?
 
So if was to demo an app, and you spent $25 on an Android release why not just sit back and go with that to show people it worked on a phone?

To say you had to jump through so many hoops with Apple seems like a waste of your time.

Perhaps if you had tested it and received a good response just pay the $99 and roll it out properly?
That's hardly a killer fee even for something non profit. :)
It’s 99 bucks a year just keep it in there. I could do it for free so I took that route but getting there was painful….
 
It will be interesting to see how Apple implement the EU version...

will changing your Settings > Region & Language > Region to something nonEU allow you to install the version everyone else in the world is using and avoid the EU directive?

and will those so desperately seeking an open slather change Region to any EU country and get access to alt app stores?

Will the EU version be the last pushed out the door for EU users?
If it meets the DMA demands could Apple choose to leave it there and only actively work on rest-of-the-world iOS 18+?
Did the EU DMA say Apple have to offer feature parity going forward?
 
It’s 99 bucks a year just keep it in there. I could do it for free so I took that route but getting there was painful….
so you jumped the hoops to get it free on Apple but paid $25 for Android?

this isnt about openness at all. it's about fee charged... :)
 
It’s 99 bucks a year just keep it in there. I could do it for free so I took that route but getting there was painful….
given you got it up there for free, let us know what app it is so we can have a look.

every app is going to take time. if you worked for free, then good on you but if you were paid, $99 still isnt expensive if this app provides worthwhile functionality. like all non-profits, get someone to sponsor it.
 
A lot of Android phones don't get bricked, including mine and I've installed 3rd party apps,.
Enough do, though.


Imagine that. A police advisory specifically calling out android.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
because they need to use hidden API that Apple prohibits).
First of all: Nothing changes in the EU, since Apple reserves the right to review apps.
Apps downloaded from other stores don’t “need to” to use hidden APIs.
Also, Apple can just reject apps that use hidden APIs - and can technically restrict access to hidden APIs.

How that might affect me? Well, their compromised app version will still communicate with the version installed on my device, which makes my device open for an attack without me even realising it
🤣🤣🤣 Are you being serious. Compromised apps (that have been reviewed by Apple, even sold through third-party store in the EU) as attack vectors against you?

That’s FUD - and not substantiated as a relevant danger by other operating systems that allow installation of unreviewed/unsigned apps.

Anyone that would attack you can create their own tool to do it. They don’t even need the original app to do so. All you need to understand is the communication protocol.
I would love to have an ability on my device to block and not see any communication from devices running apps from 3rd party app stores
Disable all internet communication and live in a cave that blocks radio waves - problem solved.
 
Said older resident doesn't need to use outside app stores on iPhone. No risk there.
The apps on other than Apple's own app stores won't be able to root your phone, at least that's what it looks like.
People of all ages get scammed, make mistakes or just plain old foolish things.
Stop with the protectionism, it's not doing anyone any good.
People should really own up to their mistakes and take a lesson out of their failures, maybe learn some critical thinking.
We're slowly, but surely, raising a society of thoughtless sheep.
What's that? Are you advocating for more educated buyers?:cool: Corporate America dies not want that; they want mindless consumers.:rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: wbeasley
The walled garden ensures only quality apps are available, and prevents trash and adware clogging up the App Store. We know that Apple is the largest resource of quality games - without any such trash. Apple arcade, with its tens of titles, is not a tactit admission that the rest of the App Store is full of adware garbage.

There is no niche left for Epic to really fill here!
 
But Apple at least is forced to do the best they can to protect users because they have a lot more at stake than some shoddy App Store being run by some scammers like epic
“Forced” to do the best they can? 😆

Because if Apple do a shoddy job on reviewing apps…

a) …you go buy your apps elsewhere?
Oh wait… you can’t, when Apple enforces a monopoly on that! 🙀

b) …you immediately fork out a 1000 Dollars and switch to a more secure smartphone and OS?
Oh wait… can’t switch to Android, cause that’s “even worse” in not even requiring a store or review for installation of apps. 😩

👉 When was a monopoly ever forced to do the best they can?

Having a monopoly is the number one reason why one is not forced to do the best they can. Especially when said monopolist can set the terms and rules as they please, without government oversight.
 
Last edited:
“Forced” to do the best they can? 😆

Because if Apple do a shoddy job on reviewing apps…
a) …you go buy your apps elsewhere? Oh wait… you can’t! 🙀
b) …you immediately switch to a more secure smartphone and OS? Oh wait… you can’t switch to Android, cause you believe that’s way worse in not even requiring a store or review for installation of apps. 😩

👉 Monopolies aren’t forced to do the best they can.

Having a monopoly is the number one reason why one is not forced to do the best they can. Especially when said monopolist can set the terms and rules as they please, without government oversight.
What monopoly are you referring to? Any citation for any legal finding?
 
Onus to do what?

If that somehow happened (which it wouldn't as the normal iOS App sandboxing and feature access restrictions are still in place) ... uninstall the App

There's no App that's going to permanently disable a hardware feature
What are you even talking about?

This is total fear mongering that makes zero sense
Can you guarantee the above 100%. I don't know if it's true or not, but on windows, it's possible that hardware can be blown out by bad applications behaving badly.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.