I think Apple will have portless iPhones by 2024. So it will not be affecting iPhones. But all iPads will be having USB C
From what I have read so far, and I could well be wrong, this is a charging connection issue. Which would not appear to rule out the possibility of a phone with wireless charging but having a Lightning (or any other design) connection for data transfer ONLY.Not to mention that syncing a half terabyte of content will take freakin forever...if it even works at all.
What would be hilarious is if Apple said ok, we won’t sell in EU. How long till the consumers forced a reversal of the policy?
If that’s how we finally get a black iPhone again I’m all for it! Someone has to save us from Apple’s team of Barbie world designers!!This is exactly the type of **** the EU is hated for by many (not by most, I know).
I actually think USB-C >>> Lightning and hate Apple doesn't bother unifying their charging cable standards. But this is Apple's ****up to sort out. It does not belong to the EU. What's next? They require black phones instead of 'space' grey?
Pathetic
I disagree the lightning is a better experience. Plugging it in is overall completely better. They are both sturdy connectors and both have weak spots. Lightning is also a smaller connector and has a smaller internal connection. Lightning is easier to connect when the connect and the device approach each other at a slight angle. USB-C has to plug in straight with very little leeway.I sense sarcasm, but I'll say this anyway: the Lightning connector paved the way for USB-C to offer a better user experience (over micro/mini-USB), but failed to become the universal standard it could have been because Apple cannot and doesn't want to play nice with others.
On the flip side, USB-C is sturdier than Lightning, so there's at least an advantage to it.
USB C can also break off in your phone…Until one breaks off in your phone.
Well, from a charging perspective already USB-C allows 100 watt power output.. Seems more than enough from a charging point of view..
Based on history? Most of them. What corporation doesn’t care what it’s consumers think? They care desperately. They might just not care what you think.I'm no fan of the EU, but if you left it to the corporates to sort out amongst themselves, how much do you think consumer's, environmental and other non-commercial interests would be recognised in the final outcome?
While they are at it, maybe they should force them all to include a 3.5 mm jack as well.And there's an argument that it should, given the inefficiencies of wireless charging. I'd like to see how any company that goes fully wireless charging will align that with their green credentials.
at some point i wish they would just tell someone no and do that. the people would still get the phones i promiseWouldn’t be that hard. Want to sell your products in the EU? Comply. No? Ok, you can’t sell them here, say bye to a large income source.
It’s rare but it’s worse than that. It’s some insane fragile hybrid dreamed up by engineers. It just looks so fragile. I hate it. But in real world testing they don’t break that often.One thing that was mentioned elsewhere is that the USB-C cable is a female connector with the male side (the tab) being in the device. Thus, the possibility of breakage could damage the device rather than just the cable. Not sure how prevalent this is though.
The market has had plenty of time to decide and it's failed. We've had decades of incompatible charging bricks sold with every kinds of device, like those crappy black things with a different jack on every single one. It's been awful for consumers and the environment, benefiting only bean-counters and Chinese factories. I'm pretty excited about the idea that maybe small-device power might be one day be standardised to the same degree as mains electricity. If that happens, the next stage would be no power bricks at all, we just plug phones and laptops directly into ubiquitous USB wall sockets.Why so authoritarian, EU? It's like you want to be up in everyone's business... let the market decide.
USB-Crybabies go home.
The market decided, they want USB-C and even Apple knows that.Why so authoritarian, EU? It's like you want to be up in everyone's business... let the market decide.
USB-Crybabies go home.
And it wasn't government entities which imposed the existing voltage/frequency and outlet design standards? Which Apple seem perfectly happy to follow. (Much as they would have found it easier to use US standard power and outlet standards on everything, everywhere.)While many would say Apple would never abandon the EU revenue stream, I also wonder whether Apple might do just this so as to avoid setting precedent of Apple allowing government entities to dictate device design choices.
Should such a requirement occur, the response will be interesting to observe.
But USB-C is here to stay and is a good standard. With USB-C I can charge at 100W, transfer data at 40Gb/s, hook up monitors, cameras and other devices and of course it is reversible. It is a great standard and one that should be the default standard. Hell, you can even connect external graphics cards over USB-C ports (Thunderbolt).
- Try moving a 100GB ProRes movie off your phone with Lightning / USB 2 (when it becomes available). USB C will be much faster.
The EU could be doing something about the fact that the EU hasn’t ever standardized on electrical wall outlet connectors, supply voltage or even supply frequency.
This will be absolutely horrible for innovation. One only needs to look at “modern” military systems to see how archaic the technology is. In most cases it is 20-30 years behind what is current.
the free market also gave us Boeing planes which were known to crash, Theranos, dumping of lead pollutants into our drinking water, etc.
we all need rules. Profit motive alone is not enough to be a decent society.
That's why the EU is going for this 'proposal' yet it's dumb. The issue is lightning existed in Apple's ecocosystem by 2yrs predating USB-C and think about the issues with the power and speeds - this does not make it a working solution>
USB-C 3.1 / 3.2 / Thunderbolt 3 / Thunderbolt 4 / USB-C 4.
Too many variables with cables, cable length devices that support which/this/that ... its a complete MESS.
- Try moving a 100GB ProRes movie off your phone with Lightning / USB 2 (when it becomes available). USB C will be much faster.
- Apple will eventually go USB c. But if it is mandated too soon, they will not be able to sell the previous generation Lightning port phones.
I don't believe so - seems mostly various industry organizations/associations adopted a standard for their particular area. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AC_power_plugs_and_socketsAnd it wasn't government entities which imposed the existing voltage/frequency and outlet design standards?
I don't care if the iPhone ever uses USB-C instead of Lightning. But, if they do, I'd rather it be because Apple chose to.
And if they do switch the iPhone to USB-C, I hope theses products will follow:
Magic Keyboard; Magic Mouse; Magic Trackpad; Dual Dock; AirPods case; AirPods Max(Does that currently use Lightning?); etc...