Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I believe this "controversy" is why they stop making HSV cameras and this camera most liekly doesn't support it. Also, it was't controversty it is how HSV works, it has to place the still image on the internet for it get pushed to your phone.
It wasn't specifically about HomeKit or HomeKit secure video. It was the fact that they said video captured by their cameras was not being stored on their remote servers, when in fact it was. Then in an attempt to cover it up, they deliberately misled customers and press, until they were pretty much backed into a corner forcing them to come clean.

Their behaviour was disgraceful, and it's extremely disappointing to see MacRumors continuing any coverage of them.
 
Just here to join the chorus of people saying that putting a Eufy camera in your home is a very bad idea. This company has shown on multiple occasions that they can't be trusted—do not give them access to the inside of your house.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xizdun
I use the 2K model and it works great because of its settings. I have it disabled in the Eufy app, so it never shows up there for streaming, and I have it automated in HomeKit to turn off when I'm at home. The 2K model camera spins up into the case, so there's no way for it to record anything when I'm home. When I'm away, it turns on and streams/records.

I wouldn't buy any camera without HKSV and the ability to physically block the camera lens. HomeKit's automations are great, the only downside is the lower res and inability to pan/tilt, although I don't really need that where mine is placed.
 
TP-Link Tapo cameras are cheap and compatible with both RTSP and ONVIF. The initial setup is done via the Tapo app to activate these protocols, you may need to disable firmware auto update TP link is known for removing already established features. These aren’t HomeKit compatible but If you're using Home Assistant on your Synology NAS, you can incorporate both HomeKit and Tapo support. On your router you need both WAN and WireGuard firewall rules set up for the cameras so they don’t phone home.

The Tapo C125 is HomeKit compatible and I think though I’m not 100% certain that you can set it up using the Home app and do not need to create an account with TP-Link. Also, it has a lens cover.
 
I have an earlier model in my garage, which I purchased entirely on the basis of local storage and on-device pet/human detection. To its credit, both work well—I have no subscription but can still stream locally stored video to my phone, and the pet detection works surprisingly well—I consistently get a ping when my cat leaves in the morning or arrives in the evening, which is really useful.

I would not put a Eufy product anywhere sensitive since I don’t really trust their security, but for an outdoor camera pointed at areas visible from the street, or an indoor camera somewhere low-sensitivity like a garage, I’ll take the risk.
 
So which one is it? Does it or does it not support HomeKit (Secure Video)?

Unless “HomeKit” and “HomeKit Secure Video” are two different things in THIS case.

Make it more obvious MacRumors that this is a paid/sponsored/incentivized post, if it is?
Support for Homekit and support for Homekit Secure Video have never been the same thing. But I believe HKSV cannot be supported unless HK is first supported.
And MacRumors puts a disclaimer when they receive any kickbacks.
 
Anyone know why I used to be able to speak through my cameras and as of a few months ago, it seems to not be possible?
I believe this is an ongoing bug. Were you able to actually speak through the cameras? Or did a button show it as an option but not tested?
 
The Tapo C125 is HomeKit compatible and I think though I’m not 100% certain that you can set it up using the Home app and do not need to create an account with TP-Link. Also, it has a lens cover.

Correct…. No need for TP account. That’s a plus.
The only thing that is a bit misleading: they say the TAPO C125 supports Wifi 6. And most people expect with Wifi6 that the option for the 5GHz band. Nope… it does only support the 2.4GHz band with limited channel width.
I bought four of these on sale last summer and while they do work, the overcrowded 2.4GHz band does cause a lot of delays or sudden disconnects every now and then.
I haven’t tested the camera’s with inserted flash card yet.
 
The previous version couldn't tilt down far, so couldn't look down if placed on a shelf. does this version have same issue?

Also, is the micro-SD card limited to 128GB still?
 
Ugh I regret ordering this after seeing the comments. Then again I’m using it only as a kitty cam when I travel a few times a year. Otherwise it wont even be plugged in.
 
Don't think I will be purchasing this one. Happy with what I have now. But waiting to see if Apple will launch any such home camera
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
That alone is a dealbreaker. Who still uses the overcrowded 2.4GHz? 👎
Companies who want a longer range for their products knowing they may be mounted in various places where a bit more range would help rather than have people buy extra hardware to cover the higher spectrum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: twistedpixel8
Given that Eufy's version of HomeKit support doesn't support pan/tilt in HomeKit, only the Eufy app, it's pretty bogus.

Not defending Eufy here (terrible company and products) but this is a HK limitation. Always has been. So blame Apple. HK doesn't support ANY pan/tilt. The camera itself will work fine and pan/tilt will work in the manufactures app but never HK until Apple allows it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.