Consumers who don't want to have hundreds of new chargers every time they get a new phone.
i think its a good idea from a personal point of view. when i go away on business with work i have to take 3 chargers with me one for my works phone, one for my personal phone and one for my ipod. in future ill just have to take one charger
selfish reason i know but will work better for me
I think that's a pile of rubbish. The British have 0% VAT on many things.
This is a good thing, I don't get it why people are complaining. USB is much better than Apple's dock connector because it's isn't Apple's and 3rd parties don't charge 20 bucks for a cable.
At least this is some improvement from the times when EU was setting shape standards for class one cucumbers...
It certainly doesn't say they can't have a 30-pin connector. It does say it has to have a mini-USB. Sure, they could put both, but really, why would be the point? Why waste the precious space? And I'm not talking about space on the outside of the phone, but on the inside. There will have to be 2 pieces of technology that will have to detect the external connections. Just seems wasteful to me.
Will this put the price of the phone up if Apple wants to mantain profit margens and no loger can charge a premium for its propriety charger?
I am pretty sure each phone only has one charger. All electronic devices have power cords/charging cords, most which are not compatible. I have more non-cell phone power cables than I do cell phone power cables.
By the way how does this prevent any of this? All this does is force people to now have to buy a charging cable because nobody will include one, because why would they? If every cell phone included the same charging cable, then you would still have the exact same number of cables as you do now. Which negates your entire argument. So it must mean they plan for nobody to include chargers with their phones.
The Eu members of parliament are a bunch of pariahs and pass the time hassling the people of the member states with bureaucracy and paperwork.
They are happy measuring bananas and inventing banana standards, something that is critical to the civilized world. (its normally the women that measure the bananas) Most have been placed there because there was no other place to put them but once in a while someone sensible thinks about something sensible!
Will this put the price of the phone up if Apple wants to mantain profit margens and no loger can charge a premium for its propriety charger?
Nonsense. The EU doesn't even have proper EMC standards any more (unlike the FCC), so BT can sell, for example, Ethernet-over-powerline devices which destroy shortwave reception for broadcast and amateur service users. Whether you consider interfering with the radio spectrum is a safety issue or not depends on your common sense, but "far stricter" is definitely out.Very true. I'd imagine the EU 'minimum safety standards' are far stricter than needed to deliver safe operation.
Council directive 2006/112. (29) of the preamble for justification, and Article 97(1) for the statement. Non-Europeans may want to read this directive to understand the hilarious extent to which the EU micromanages constituent nations. You're correct that reduced rates are permitted on specific items (which are enumerated (but of course individual nations have negotiated exceptions, also enumerated)), but the standard rate of VAT must be no less than 15% in order to prevent (and I'm being serious here) "structural imbalances" and "distortions of competition".I think that's a pile of rubbish. The British have 0% VAT on many things.
I am pretty sure each phone only has one charger. All electronic devices have power cords/charging cords, most which are not compatible. I have more non-cell phone power cables than I do cell phone power cables.
So you argument doesn't stick. It seems to me this change is to protect people who can't manage to bring their charging cable with them when they travel.
Seems like a big price to pay to protect those people.
It is not like the average person buys a new cell phone every 3 months.
By the way how does this prevent any of this? All this does is force people to now have to buy a charging cable because nobody will include one, because why would they? If every cell phone included the same charging cable, then you would still have the exact same number of cables as you do now. Which negates your entire argument. So it must mean they plan for nobody to include chargers with their phones.
Your iPod will not work on this standard charger. Plus you only plan on charging one thing at a time? Most people, I suspect would want to charge everything at night, so most people would likely bring multiple cables anyways. Again, I don't see how this is, in reality, helping anyone.
****ing communists, always getting everything right.
What MR didn't state is that Apple didn't have to do this. They are just nor of the manufacturers that said they will.
I think that's a pile of rubbish. The British have 0% VAT on many things.
Again, this does not affect the dock connector at all. They do not need to add a micro-USB connector to the phone. It only affects the charger.
I don't think anyone would dispute the fact that the EU wastes money. Farming subsidies are a great example but then the US do the same thing too. In fact the reason for the EU in the first place was so that European nations could compete with countries like the US economically. You as a business owner should appreciate the fact that you have access to a free trade agreement which covers over 500 million people.
Well actually they did - otherwise they'd have to leave the European market - which they obviously aren't going to do.
Council directive 2006/112. (29) of the preamble for justification, and Article 97(1) for the statement. Non-Europeans may want to read this directive to understand the hilarious extent to which the EU micromanages constituent nations. You're correct that reduced rates are permitted on specific items (which are enumerated (but of course individual nations have negotiated exceptions, also enumerated)), but the standard rate of VAT must be no less than 15% in order to prevent (and I'm being serious here) "structural imbalances" and "distortions of competition".
Got it. But why would we ever need a separate docking and charging connection? Multiple connections on the iPhone/iPod make zero sense. Geez, they don't even want to add additional buttons, why would they want to add a redundant connector? It goes against Apple's obsession with a thin, compact, and streamlined product.
Well this certainly sucks. Why in the world would anyone think it's a good idea to give governments this kind of power?
yes it does apply to iPhones and iPods. My old iPod firewire chargers do not work with iPhones from 3G and up. That is quite stupid because the connector works and the phone recognizes the charger and then says "this device is not made for this iPhone...".
Add to that the third party docks and chargers that won't work anymore and then say again "Not that that applies to the iPhone,".
Meh...I'm hoping Apple comes up with that rumoured wireless syncing/charging station.
We need less wires, not more.