Bad for the environment? HOW lol
By encouraging loyal Apple customers to ditch all their lightning cables en masse.
Bad for the environment? HOW lol
“We want to ensure that any new legislation will not result in the shipment of any unnecessary cables or external adaptors with every device, or render obsolete the devices and accessories used…”
What a waste of law making energy. Im guessing the European Parliament has nothing better to do if they are making laws like this.
The port itself hasn’t changed since its inception. Don’t confuse USB protocols with the port. The port has gained new versions of the USB protocol, as well as some other protocols, but the port itself is the same. That’s USB-C’s strength, the ability to evolve as industry needs change.No, but it's a very good port that's already in its second (or is it 3rd) generation. It's quite adaptable, and should suffice for a good long time. And when a better port comes along, all of the phone manufacturers can get together and adopt it too. Just like they all* did with USB.
*Excluding Apple, obviously.
What a waste of law making energy. Im guessing the European Parliament has nothing better to do if they are making laws like this.
iPhones won’t have ports in 5 years, so it’s a moot point.
No, but it's a very good port that's already in its second (or is it 3rd) generation. It's quite adaptable, and should suffice for a good long time. And when a better port comes along, all of the phone manufacturers can get together and adopt it too. Just like they all* did with USB.
*Excluding Apple, obviously.
No, that's what I meant. You have USB Type-C, version 3, 3.1, and 3.2, something something gen 1, gen 2... Heck, you can even do USB 1, 1.1 and 2 over type-C.The port itself hasn’t changed since its inception. Don’t confuse USB protocols with the port. The port has gained new versions of the USB protocol, as well as some other protocols, but the port itself is the same. That’s USB-C’s strength, the ability to evolve as industry needs change.
They’re rumored to come out with at least one model in 2021 that’s portless. So I imagine give it 5 years, that’ll become standard for every iPhone.Do you really see Apple wanting to bundle in a wireless charger in with every iPhone?
IIRC, The EU never mandated USB ports, just that they all had to be the same, and let the manufacturers figure it out.The flaw here is that USB was a technology initiated by an elective workgroup, not a bureaucracy. It was willingly adopted, not mandated.
If a connective technology is mandated by law the delay and cost of court battles on 'the new standard' and lawyers battling for control and royalties will stifle development. And all that ultimately leads to more cost to the consumer … always.
I don't think Apple is defending Lightning, per se … it is using it as the example that if a company desires an enhanced tool to improve its product it should not be impeded based on an arbitrary limitation.
When Lightning was introduced, regardless of what you think about it today, it was the only way Apple could achieve its goals.
A free market economy will always produce abundance, some of it will go to waste, no doubt. This is very natural. Nature is also very wasteful. Think of all the apple trees everywhere, whose apples never get picked but end up rotting on the ground below.I have about 3 shoe cartons full of cables from all different kind of devices, that will never be used again, but came with the product. Multiply that by probably a billion people and you have a lot of wasted resources.
Them meddling in anything always works out well also.Government meddling in the tech market always works out well.
Bad for the environment? HOW lol
instead of designing our products for us, why don't they figure out how to design laws that discourage such outcomes. their laws have failed us and given us oligopolies in all areas of the economy.
With goals of reducing waste and increasing convenience...