Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

TECK

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Nov 18, 2011
1,129
479
I'm coming from a 13 years old Mac Pro 2010, which I fully upgraded and running OpenCore on it.

I'm curious what is the expected Apple software upgrades support timeline? If I could get 5-7 years of upgrades, it will be satisfactory for me. My new M2 Ultra specs:

1687657491467.png


Old Mac Pro:

Screen Shot 2023-06-13 at 2.17.16 PM.png
 
Last edited:
I'm coming for a 13 years old Mac Pro 2010, which I fully upgraded and running OpenCore on it.

I'm curious what is the expected Apple software upgrades support timeline? If I could get 5-7 years of upgrades, it will be satisfactory for me. My new M2 Ultra specs:

View attachment 2223215

Old Mac Pro:

View attachment 2223217

Likely 9-11 years like most 2007-2017 Intel Macs.

I am so excited for you.

Jumping from a 32nm chip to a 5nm chip.

Your 2023 Mac Studio's final Security Update will occur between 2032-2034.

By 2032 0.5nm (A5) to 2034 0.3nm (A3) chips will be out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TECK
For current Mac Pro, I have another year on Monterey until security updates stop being provided. I could technically wait for the M3, but I think Studio M2 Ultra is an amazing upgrade for my Mac Pro. I'm wondering if Apple will have different support lifetime spans for each M chip? For example, an user who bought a Studio M1 Ultra will have their support ending two years earlier, vs a Studio M3 Ultra.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Longplays
For current Mac Pro, I have another year on Monterey until security updates stop being provided. I could technically wait for the M3, but I think Studio M2 Ultra is an amazing upgrade for my Mac Pro. I'm wondering if Apple will have different support lifetime spans for each M chip? For example, an user who bought a Studio M1 Ultra will have their support ending two years earlier, vs a Studio M3 Ultra.
macOS Intel versionLatest updateFinal update
2022 VenturaJun 20232025
2021 MontereyJun 20232024
2020 Big SurJun 20232023
2019 CatalinaJul 20222022
2018 MojaveJul 20212021
2017 High SierraNov 20202020
2016 SierraSep 20192019
2015 El CapitanJul 20182018
2014 YosemiteJul 20172017
2013 MavericksJul 20162016

M3 Ultra's likely to be out Q1 2025. You willing to wait 21 more months?

If I had your 2010 Mac Pro I would have bought into the 2021 Mac Studio M1 Ultra.

My guess is you waited to see what the 2023 Mac Studio had to offer hoping for swappable CPU, dGPU, eGPU, RAM, SSD & logicboard?
 
M3 Ultra's likely to be out Q1 2025. You willing to wait 21 more months?
I already ordered the M2 Ultra, delivery July 23th. :)

I was simply curious if the software updates end of support might change based on the M chip type. I think is all based on software but Apply could say, this macOS release can run on an M3 but not on an M2 chip.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: Longplays
I was simply curious if the software updates end of support might change based on the M chip type. I think is all based on software but Apply could say, this macOS release can run on an M3 but not on an M2 chip.
Windows by comparison...

VersionRelease DateEnd Support DateMonths
Windows 1110/5/202112/5/2031(?)122
Windows 107/29/201510/14/2025122
Windows 810/26/20121/10/2023122
Windows 710/22/20091/14/2020122
Windows Vista1/30/20074/11/2017122
Windows XP8/24/20014/8/2014151
Windows 20002/17/20007/13/2010124
Windows 986/25/19987/11/200696
WIndows 958/24/199512/31/200176
 
Unless your workflow includes the requirement for Apple ProRes media acceleration, jumping to a M2 Ultra may not be necessary. Ramdisk benchmarks show M1 and M2 memory <-> CPU bandwidth has not significantly jumped from M1->M2. Likewise GPU bandwidth has similarry had a minimal increase (at least for my lice streaming workflow). Depending on your workflow, a M1 may perform similarly for a significant savings over a M2.

While my 5,1 Mac Pro at 96gb, and Ryzentosh at 128gb, had similar workflows, I've never found the 64GB on my M1 MacStudio Ultra to be a limiting factor. In my area, raw Open GL Performance is needed to support OBS, which is an area Mac Silicon has performance scaling issues with.

GPU's and media engines aside, the M2 Mac Studio Ultra offers a Minor uplift to the M1 Mac Studio Ultra that negates the cost of a yearly upgrade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TECK
@handheldgames for sanity reasons, I went with the 128GB upgrade. You're telling me I could very well stick with the 64GB option and save $1000? The current Mac Pro 2010 fully upgraded satisfies my needs, the main reason to upgrade is software support, I've chosen the Ultra for performance reasons. Additional storage, if needed will be handled through TB4 external drive and a NAS with 75TB storage (on 10GB network), that's why I stay with the minimum 1TB setup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Longplays
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.