Big question that might not be answerable right now...this concerns the whole Lightning headphone/USB Type-C Headphone migration that is about to occur. We're already seeing super high-end lightning headphones for the iPhone.
My question is this: for high end audio, enthusiasts will use external DACs for their computers. Does the fact that lightning headphones contain their own external DAC located along the cable make using a high-end external DAC in the future completely incompatible with these new lighting headphones?
I'm just trying to wrap my head around some kind of future DDC (digital-to-digital converter) of some sort. Is there no market for a high end desktop amplifier of some sort? Are all of these new headphones stuck within their own little worlds?
I believe USB Type-C has an analogue audio pin in the spec. Does lightning have an analogue audio pin as well? As that's probably how the lighting to 3.5mm converter works? Is that the answer? And are current high-end lightning headphones being produced with an analogue passthrough in mind?
edit: turns out the apple lightning to 3.5mm converter has a tiny dac inside...
My question is this: for high end audio, enthusiasts will use external DACs for their computers. Does the fact that lightning headphones contain their own external DAC located along the cable make using a high-end external DAC in the future completely incompatible with these new lighting headphones?
I'm just trying to wrap my head around some kind of future DDC (digital-to-digital converter) of some sort. Is there no market for a high end desktop amplifier of some sort? Are all of these new headphones stuck within their own little worlds?
I believe USB Type-C has an analogue audio pin in the spec. Does lightning have an analogue audio pin as well? As that's probably how the lighting to 3.5mm converter works? Is that the answer? And are current high-end lightning headphones being produced with an analogue passthrough in mind?
edit: turns out the apple lightning to 3.5mm converter has a tiny dac inside...
Last edited: