If you're going to build an "external booter", you can do just as well to go with USB3, instead of paying more for thunderbolt.
I'm using a Crucial m500 240gb drive in a plugable.com "lay-flat" USB3/SATA dock. Read speeds were 275mbps and write speeds were 432mbps (initial test upon installation).
If you're willing to accept the two disadvantages of USB3 vis-a-vis thunderbolt:
1. May not be able to enable TRIM (but some current drives don't seem to require it)
and
2. May not be able to run firmware updates
... then USB3 is a more cost-effective way to go, and may actually yield faster results in normal usage.
Aside:
I've been wondering how to deal with possible "speed degradation" of the drive, as it ages. I found a page describing how to "reset" an SSD back to "original condition" by using something called "Parted Magic" (which runs from a Linux bootable CD) here:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2088341/how-to-restore-your-ssd-to-peak-performance.html
There's no "may" about it - USB3 does not support passing of AHCI commands, so TRIM support is impossible over USB3.
Other than that, this is accurate.