The Apple Watch to unlock works great.
How is having a touch screen progress?Good point. Oh wait. Everyone else already has this. And has had it for over decade. My Surface Pro is over 13 years old. It has a touch screen (which is very useful) and the equivalent of Face ID. It's not a shark, it's progress.
It's funny, the same people complaining the Mac doesn't have touch ID are also the ones that want to lift their arm and reach over their desk for the touch screenBut reaching to the top corner of the keyboard is such a chore. I gotta lift my arm and reach over the desk to the furthest key. That's almost a whole calorie of work, Apple. I ain't trying to close exercise rings when I log into the computer.
Right and it's a stupid idea that has made the OS worse to use for everyoneThe writing has been on the wall for a couple of years with how the interface has been changing. More spacing around controls, larger click targets, etc.
Yeah I would assume it's a group policy since I don't have to do anything. It just auto logs in. Works really well to. Can't think the last time I had to use my pin or password.Well not necessarily swipe, works by hitting a key too. Either way it asks me to dismiss the lock screen before letting me to my desktop.
A cursory google shows that this is a setting that can be toggled. But I went and checked, and interestingly mine has automatic dismiss enabled; yet it still requires me to dismiss the lock screen to enter.
View attachment 2568754
I'm guessing it's some group policy setting by our overzealous IT dept. But either way i cannot get to my desktop without physical interaction by either hitting a key, or swiping away the lockscreen.
A surface is most definitely a laptop but can be used as a tablet.Surface Pro is a Tablet, NOT a Laptop. Big difference.
How are other things laptops able to do it then?In the end, the very thinness of the MacBook Air/Pro display makes the Face ID idea not yet viable. Is Apple willing to put in a very slight "bump" on the back of the top of display panel to accommodate Face ID sensors?
You do know you don't HAVE to use the touchscreen right?It's funny, the same people complaining the Mac doesn't have touch ID are also the ones that want to lift their arm and reach over their desk for the touch screen
never gonna happen...or might even revert to having only password-based security.
A surface is most definitely a laptop but can be used as a tablet.
Don't forget there is more then one type of Surface. Only the Pro is a tablet.No, it is a tablet first and foremost. It does not come with the keyboard as it is sold as a tablet. You have to buy the keyboard separately, or add it on as an accessory at time of purchase. That is a fact, it is a tablet.
Anyway let's keep the iPad Pro the Surface has its own Face ID equivalent, I think I it is a bad move if Apple don't bring it to Mac's.
Shows that there are sensible UX people still at Apple making decisions...
Edit: Love the reactions.But seriously, let’s think this through — Face ID on a Mac doesn’t actually make much sense from a user experience perspective.
When you’re using a keyboard, Touch ID is already the most convenient option. It’s quick, reliable, and doesn’t interrupt your workflow. For Face ID to be a worthwhile upgrade, it would need to offer a better experience — not just a different one.
Now, consider the practical issues:
So what’s the real UX benefit of Face ID on a Mac? Honestly… none. If anything, it’d be a step backward compared to the simplicity and practicality of Touch ID.
- Many people use their MacBooks closed with external monitors → no Face ID.
- “But we could still have Touch ID on the keyboard!” → sure, so why bother with Face ID then?
- Plenty of users cover their webcams for privacy (yes, even Mac users).
- The Face ID sensor would sit right where you touch to open your laptop → smudges everywhere.
- And unlike your phone, how often do you actually clean your laptop screen?
Don't forget there is more then one type of Surface. Only the Pro is a tablet.
But I do HAVE to use the interface that has been ruined by what seems to be attempts to make it touch-friendlyYou do know you don't HAVE to use the touchscreen right?
Sadly the module is still too thick for Apple’s standard especially on MacBooks. For iMac, it will fit but most people would want FaceID on their notebooks.But current MBP screens are already thick enough imo. Apple may not need to thin down the module too much to fit. The decision of not adding Face ID probably is a combo of engineering and business decision.
As someone who uses laptop mostly as a laptop.. and the touchid failing to register my fingerprint 80% if not more of the time... I'd love for there to be faceID.... was so nice to finally switch to a phone with it and not have to deal with multiple attempts at unlocking.Shows that there are sensible UX people still at Apple making decisions...
Edit: Love the reactions.But seriously, let’s think this through — Face ID on a Mac doesn’t actually make much sense from a user experience perspective.
When you’re using a keyboard, Touch ID is already the most convenient option. It’s quick, reliable, and doesn’t interrupt your workflow. For Face ID to be a worthwhile upgrade, it would need to offer a better experience — not just a different one.
Now, consider the practical issues:
So what’s the real UX benefit of Face ID on a Mac? Honestly… none. If anything, it’d be a step backward compared to the simplicity and practicality of Touch ID.
- Many people use their MacBooks closed with external monitors → no Face ID.
- “But we could still have Touch ID on the keyboard!” → sure, so why bother with Face ID then?
- Plenty of users cover their webcams for privacy (yes, even Mac users).
- The Face ID sensor would sit right where you touch to open your laptop → smudges everywhere.
- And unlike your phone, how often do you actually clean your laptop screen?
Except when the watch needs to be unlocked to unlock the Mac. Otherwise I agree. I use this method to unlock my Mac Pros. It even worked on my old 2010 models which were upgraded with newer Bluetooth and wifi.The Apple Watch to unlock works great.
My TouchID devices get my fingerprint 95% of the time correctly. I'd check my hardware if it does not recognize 80% of the time.As someone who uses laptop mostly as a laptop.. and the touchid failing to register my fingerprint 80% if not more of the time... I'd love for there to be faceID.... was so nice to finally switch to a phone with it and not have to deal with multiple attempts at unlocking.
Yes I did hear about it. Sorry if you happen to be in the 1-3% of the population.Heard of such a thing as clammy hands?
I buy apple products primarily because they have FaceID.
Touchid never works for me as my hands are pretty much always slightly moist.
And I know I'm not alone, lots of people have this handicap.
Quick, email TC & tell him to drop all work & not to include cameras in the AirPod pros based on your expert analysis, or to drop the ones already in the screen as it makes the MBP too heavy & expensive!🙄Which would make the laptop more expensive to produce and the extra material would not only make it heavier and thicker, but TOP heavy. I would agree that it would be easy to make an ungainly, top heavy, heavier than it needs to be laptop.
I have dry hands and go rock climbing often... the moment they're dryer the sensor takes forever to recognise itMy TouchID devices get my fingerprint 95% of the time correctly. I'd check my hardware if it does not recognize 80% of the time.
Oh, in that case this might make sense then.I have dry hands and go rock climbing often... the moment they're dryer the sensor takes forever to recognize it