Ha ha haaaaa! Down to $29 now. I really hope they fall further and further.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18257043
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18257043
I don't use Facebook nor do I agree with their initial valuation. That said, I see no need to be happy over the drop in stock price.
Zuckerberg (confirmed ass) is loosing money on an overhyped valuation, I see complete reason to be happy.
Dare I ask for a source?
What, haven't you seen The Social Network?![]()
Ha ha haaaaa! Down to $29 now. I really hope they fall further and further.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18257043
So you're happy that people are losing money they invested?![]()
Since when is stupidity rewarded? Facebook doesn't create anything. Their main revenue intake is investors and banner ads.
Zuckerberg (confirmed ass) is loosing money on an overhyped valuation, I see complete reason to be happy.
What, haven't you seen The Social Network?![]()
So you're happy that people are losing money they invested?![]()
Ha ha haaaaa! Down to $29 now. I really hope they fall further and further.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18257043
Yes, I am (hence the "ha ha haaaa" in my first post). When people think a website is worth $100bn, they deserve to lose. The sheer number of tech bubbles that have popped over the last 10yrs and people still listen to the hype and wave their cash. They deserve to lose it.
It's estimated that FB has lost about $35 billion since its debut.
Nieve stock market question, but if the initial IPO was 38 and then opened at 42 and finally dropped to around 28 where did that initial investing money go and why did it not hold back to the opening price.
If there is no money what pushes the stock down?Facebook.
The entire idea of an IPO is to issue new shares to raise money for the company.
After that there is no "money" going anywhere than between investors like any other stock. And like any other asset it can go up or down in value.
If there is no money what pushes the stock down?
This isn't in PRSI so I won't go into details... but daily.Since when is stupidity rewarded?
So did the initial investors who set the price at 38 lose when the price tanked or did they get their money back and the people who bought after the IPO lose out? Just trying to wrap my head around how a stock can open at 38 with trading not even started and then lose most of it in 3 days considered they said it was the highest amount of shares ever.Huh?
What pushes the price of a used car down vs pushing the value of a "classic" car up?
The stock goes down because the price people are offering to pay for it is less than what people paid for it originally. No one forced anyone to buy in at 38 or 42. Also, no one forced anyone to sell at 38 or 42.
So did the initial investors who set the price at 38 lose when the price tanked or did they get their money back and the people who bought after the IPO lose out? Just trying to wrap my head around how a stock can open at 38 with trading not even started and then lose most of it in 3 days considered they said it was the highest amount of shares ever.