Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The statement could be proved to be fact, but as myself and Excursions pointed out, from just taking the statement with no other external influence it can't be said that the statement is fact. That's how I believe the test was supposed to work. You're supposed to say fact or opinion based on just the statement in front of you.

You don't need any additional information...the choices are Fact or Opinion...we can probably lengthen that to mean "Is the following sentence a statement of fact or of opinion"

"The tuition amounts are expected to rise"...the underlined opinion phrase is in the passive voice, indicating the direct object of the action: "The tuition amount" "are expected" (by an agent, in this case unknown) "to rise". The existence of the passive voice and existence of the agent, known or unknown (and a lack of any modifiers) is what makes this a statement of fact and not opinion because it is a fact that: "the agent is expecting the tuition amount to rise" (the same statement in active voice).

Now whether it's a "True" or "False" statement of fact is another question (which would require tracking down the agent)...but that wasn't the question asked in this exam.
 
Red Grass

Now whether it's a "True" or "False" statement of fact is another question (which would require tracking down the agent)...but that wasn't the question asked in this exam.

Exactly. For example, one of the questions on the test may have been:

"Grass is red."

This is a statement of fact, not an opinion, despite being obviously false.

"Grass is more pretty than trees." would be an opinion.

Another story to make the original poster feel better. I was applying for a doctoral program. I had to do a "writing on demand" which involved answering questions (in essay form) about an article.

The most significant questions were to:
a) explain the author's opinion
b) discuss whether or not I agree with his opinion and why.

Unfortunately, the moron who chose the article I got chose an article where the author was simply describing FACT. He was describing approaches that some organizations were taking to address a problem. At no point in the entire article did he express any opinion as to if any of these approaches were effective or moral.

Which leaves you in a real predicament. The only valid way to answer those questions was to say, "the author of this article chose to describe a few approaches currently being taken by organizations to address the problem. At no point in this article did he attempt to address the effectiveness or morality of these approaches. Since the author did not make his opinion known, this question cannot be answered."

Hoping that it was a "trick" question all along. Or, I could have chosen to ignore the fact that I knew better and to assume that, because the author chose these examples, these were examples he agreed with, and write the essay accordingly.

Well, I did the right thing. Which I was later told was the wrong choice.

Life isn't easy. Sometimes you're brighter than the people who have power over you.

:)
 
But you can argue that the speculation element isn't the important part of this statement. Here is an example:

"George W. Bush is the president" (Fact)

"George W. Bush is the worst president" (Opinion)

"It is thought that George W. Bush is the worst president." (Fact, as long as the linked opinion is held by one person...actually in this case, only the concept/though of the opinion has to exist, not be held as true/false).

Or in wording more similar to the original question:
"George W. Bush is believed to be the worst president."( again Fact, as long as the linked opinion is held by one person).

Tony Blair is the worst President (fact)
Tony Blair is the Prime Minister (opinion):)
 
I think it's a little cloudier that than. While an expectation doesn't equal a factual future occurrence, you could argue that asking "Fact or Opinion" isn't evaluating the truth of the expectation itself, but the truth of the existence of the expectation. As phrased, as long as one person holds the expectation that tuitions will rise, it's a factual statement. A factual statement that an opinion exists, but still a factual statement.

My sentiments exactly. I think the problem with this question is that it is in the passive, and I think that is why the teacher is classing it as opinion. See, if GWB expects tuition to rise then the statement is a fact about GWB's opinion. But 'it is expected...' might be a fact about someone's (or a group of people's) opinion, but because the agent cannot be identified or the opinion verified (within the bounds of an isolated linguistic specimen), then you're on the grounds of, I love this word, truthiness. Newspapers pull this kind of linguistic balancing act all the time.

(OK looks like I should have read ahead a bit more. Still, if the agent is unknown, TheAnswer, then the line between fact and opinion is thin.)
 
...Still, if the agent is unknown, TheAnswer, then the line between fact and opinion is thin.)

Thin, maybe even razor thin, but existent. The teacher, if he is author of the exam, created the agent (as far as the reader is concerned) at the same time he phrased the sentence in the passive. Passive voice doesn't exist without an agent, so the very act of phrasing the sentence in the passive brought the agent into existence. So, the teacher can't argue that an agent that holds such as expectation is non-existent, because his own phrasing brought about the agent's existence.
 
Thin, maybe even razor thin, but existent....

and if it was an english grammar class, then it might be a point worth arguing. But it wasn't, it was a civics class.....and in that context the question is clearly related to understanding whether "expectations" are "opinions" or "facts"
 
Existence

and if it was an english grammar class, then it might be a point worth arguing. But it wasn't, it was a civics class.....and in that context the question is clearly related to understanding whether "expectations" are "opinions" or "facts"

I don't know how clear it is. Noone's arguing that expectations aren't opinions. However, the question asked about the existence of said expectation, which is a fact.

The kid should not only get his point back, but he should get an extra credit point for being on the ball. :)
 
....However, the question asked about the existence of said expectation, which is a fact....

no it didn't....the existence of "expectations" was a given.

"Question: The tuition amounts are expected to rise."

the intent of the question, given the context, was clearly to ask whether "expectations" are by nature to be considered facts or opinions
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.