Feb. 3rd New Powermacs

[Sun Baked]

Originally posted by JSRockit


I don't think it hurts Apple too much...I think it generates excitement that is truly unique to Apple. I don't see Sony rumor sites...or Toshiba rumor sites. However, I guess you mean that once the info is leaked that it hurts apple's current product line-up...that is true.
Truly though...the few people that always wait to buy because of a rumor site is probably a small number.

Ahh yes, those spectacular and exciting rumors on future MicroSoft products - I think the site is www.apple.com

 

[MrMacMan]

Guys, if the leak is genuine then apple will hunt him/her down. But in not real rumors, are they gonna hunt the guy down?
Probably not, and Whenever I got a rumor I made a new Account, ran an anonomizer, and hopefully I didn't give out info so they could track me, but, I never post the leaks I get on this sn.

 

[Wano]

Re: Feb. 3rd New Powermacs

Originally posted by teamplayer



$1,599.00
Dual 1GHz
256K L2 cache
NO L3 cache
everything else is the same as current product.

Why wouldn't they include a L3 cache?...i think that with out it many poeple would turn to the iMac...but who knows!?!

 

[JustAGuy]

Re: Don't get too excited

Originally posted by ChicagoMac
I'd like to point out that this is TeamPlayer's 1st post ever on Macrumors and he or she has given no proof as to why these figures and stats are true. I'd like to know where teamplayer gets his or her info. I could make up some believable stats too.

Then that'd be one up on these stats. There is no bus multiplier that would allow a 1.43GHz chip on a 167MHz bus. 8.5 is the closest, at 1.42, but definately not 1.43.