Become a MacRumors Supporter for $25/year with no ads, private forums, and more!

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
52,024
13,645


Apple subsidiary Claris today announced the launch of FileMaker 19, marking the debut of its first open platform for developers to build custom apps that leverage JavaScript integrations, drag-and-drop add-ons, AI through Core ML, and more.

filemaker1.jpg

Claris says that with FileMaker 19, developers are able to be more productive and businesses are able to leverage Claris' global community of developers, add-on marketplace, and existing developer resources to collaboratively solve complex digital programs.

filemaker2.jpg

FileMaker 19 includes access to plug-and-play add-ons, JavaScript libraries, and more, as outlined by Claris:
FileMaker 19 enables Claris' global developer community to use the platform they already know to deliver powerful custom apps to more than 1.3 million active users faster than ever before. With FileMaker 19, developers can:
  • Create in a snap with plug-and-play add-ons -- Use add-ons like Kanban boards and photo galleries to snap together robust apps faster than ever before, or leverage JavaScript, web services, native FileMaker code and more to create sharable add-ons to sell in the Claris Marketplace.
  • Use readily-available JavaScript libraries -- Use readily-available JavaScript libraries or create custom code to directly embed maps, animated graphics, data visualization, and more into their apps.
  • Build smarter apps -- Enable rich user experiences with Core ML machine learning models, support for Siri Shortcuts, and NFC (near field communication) tag reading. Unlock the potential of data with image classification, sentiment analysis, object detection and more.
  • Create directly in the cloud -- Fast track app deployment by creating apps directly in FileMaker Cloud, skipping the multi-step configuration process and making apps instantly sharable.
  • Host where you want -- In addition to Mac and Windows, FileMaker Server can now be hosted on Linux, an industry standard OS, for high availability and reliability.
Pricing on FileMaker 19 begins at $15 per month per user, and the software can be purchased from the Claris website.

Article Link: FileMaker 19 for macOS Launches With Support for Third-Party Libraries
 
Last edited:

nwcs

macrumors 68020
Sep 21, 2009
2,023
2,774
Tennessee
Well, for sentimental reasons I’d like FileMaker to survive but I don’t think I would ever use it these days. I’d go with either Azure SQL for cloud or just use SQL Server on a Win machine and .NET on the Mac. I’d be curious to know what kind of marketshare FM has even on the Mac side.
 
Comment

PlayUltimate

macrumors 6502
Jul 29, 2016
450
626
Boulder, CO
Well, for sentimental reasons I’d like FileMaker to survive but I don’t think I would ever use it these days. I’d go with either Azure SQL for cloud or just use SQL Server on a Win machine and .NET on the Mac. I’d be curious to know what kind of marketshare FM has even on the Mac side.

According to the attached, its marketshare is nearly insignificant.
 
Comment

Boyd01

Moderator
Staff member
Feb 21, 2012
5,437
2,561
New Jersey Pine Barrens
I have so many legacy filemaker databases that I don't want to switch. Have been planning to upgrade for quite awhile, and will have to when I finally make the transition to Catalina, since my old 32-bit version will finally stop working. This looks like a nice upgrade, I especially like the idea of Javascript integration. Look forward to giving it a try soon.
 
Comment

lunarworks

macrumors 68000
Jun 17, 2003
1,972
5,208
Toronto, Canada
Well, for sentimental reasons I’d like FileMaker to survive but I don’t think I would ever use it these days. I’d go with either Azure SQL for cloud or just use SQL Server on a Win machine and .NET on the Mac. I’d be curious to know what kind of marketshare FM has even on the Mac side.
I was about to say the same thing. I have no use for this software, but it's weirdly comforting that it's still around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adib and nwcs
Comment

4jasontv

Suspended
Jul 31, 2011
4,072
4,437
Points for Claris for making non-subscriptions options available. The pricing is suspicious but I will give them credit for at least offering it.

Edit: Apparently the non-subscription option doesn't allow you to make iOS or cloud accessible files.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: thedarkhalf
Comment

harriska2

macrumors 65816
Mar 16, 2011
1,440
703
Oregon
Got 2 for 1 nonprofit pricing a year and a half ago. Love it. Almost as good as my old Oracle and PL/SQL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boyd01
Comment

Logic368

macrumors member
Oct 17, 2011
73
259
I will never buy another FileMaker product. Bought FileMaker 14 back in the day for $400. A couple years later, Mojave came out, and it suddenly wouldn’t open anymore. Never got a notice from them that I shouldn’t upgrade to Mojave. Since I couldn’t downgrade from Mojave, the only option was to spend another $400 to get FileMaker 15. What a piece of **** company. Migrated to Airtable and never looked back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonmet
Comment

centauratlas

macrumors 65816
Jan 29, 2003
1,375
2,272
Florida
Wow...."Filemaker" and "Claris". Now those are two names I haven't heard in a long, long time. Kind of warms the cockles of my heart.
Now we just need an article about the "Magic Windows" word processor (for the Apple ][) and my day will be complete.
 
Comment

Mr. Dee

macrumors 68030
Dec 4, 2003
2,909
4,480
Jamaica
Well, for sentimental reasons I’d like FileMaker to survive but I don’t think I would ever use it these days. I’d go with either Azure SQL for cloud or just use SQL Server on a Win machine and .NET on the Mac. I’d be curious to know what kind of marketshare FM has even on the Mac side.
There is also Microsoft Access. There desktop dbms with subscription is $550. You purchase a full copy of Office Professional for that kinda money. I guess they are not interested in growing market share.
 
Comment

simonmet

Cancelled
Sep 9, 2012
2,666
3,656
Sydney
Funny how you only ever hear about this software every couple of years when they offer a mediocre update, then it disappears into obscurity again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tICM
Comment

Boyd01

Moderator
Staff member
Feb 21, 2012
5,437
2,561
New Jersey Pine Barrens
Also funny that when an update does occur, lots of people who don't use Filemaker show up to bash it.

I don't like the price either - which is why I still use my 10-year-old copy of FileMaker Pro 11. It still runs just fine on Sierra, have not tried it on Mojave but confirmed it won't work on Catalina (no surprise, since it's 32-bit). Anyway, I have certainly gotten my money's worth from FileMaker 11. And I use the same version on two Macs and one Windows computer. The old versions allowed this, but evidently the new ones don't. Not to happy about that.

I started with FileMaker sometime in the early 1990's. In 1993 I built a complex relational database that I used to manage my department's multi-million dollar purchasing, payroll and contracting, which I continued to upgrade until I retired in 2011. We had a filemaker server so that a number of staff could use it. In 1994 I built my own personal finance database that I still use today. It contains every penny I've spent since 1994. Starting in 2008 I have built increasingly complex relational databases to manage the geodata for the free maps that I offer at https://boydsmaps.com

Like I said, I don't like the price and don't like the restriction on installation. I guess I could switch to something else, but why should I re-invent the wheel? So I will upgrade (reluctantly) and hopefully that will last me for another 10 years. The thought has occured to me, however, that I could just continue with my existing FileMaker 11 with a virtual machine in Parallels when I upgrade to a new Mac. But the new version does seem to have some nice features. I will certainly try the 30-day free trial at least.
 
Comment

MacBH928

Contributor
May 17, 2008
5,602
2,257
I don't understand who uses this product or why is Apple, the $60B in cash company, is still keeping it around (but somehow magsafe was too much). I don't even know who are the competitors to this product. I can't think of a situation where someone would say "I need FileMaker"

Its also expensive. I am sure there is some open-source alternative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tICM
Comment

hobowankenobi

macrumors 68000
Aug 27, 2015
1,664
607
on the land line mr. smith.
I don't understand who uses this product or why is Apple, the $60B in cash company, is still keeping it around (but somehow magsafe was too much). I don't even know who are the competitors to this product. I can't think of a situation where someone would say "I need FileMaker"

Its also expensive. I am sure there is some open-source alternative.


The situation is: We need a specific DB that fits our workflow....we don't want to change our workflow to fit off-the-shelf DB options, and we don't have or want devs to create it.

There is not much out there (last I checked) that can hit the sweet spot of power vs ease of creation, reporting, and mods, and works on Macs, Win, and iOS that FM does.
 
Last edited:
Comment

mannyvel

macrumors 6502a
Mar 16, 2019
810
1,348
Hillsboro, OR
Really, Filemaker is about decent performance with a great UI builder. It's brutally easy to make something that's easy to use, performs well, and needs no maintenance.

They missed the client-server boat, but they could probably have a big niche in mobile/tablet solutions if they wanted to market it that way. I'm still annoyed that they killed Bento, and their pricing is prohibitive, but as an easy way to build database-driven good looking solutions it's still one of the best.

Their problem is they're part of a company again, and it doesn't sound like their management is into the whole "lose money and grow" train. Instead, they're on the "let's milk our existing customers" train.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boyd01 and stefman
Comment

Kabeyun

macrumors 68040
Mar 27, 2004
3,014
5,669
Eastern USA
Heh. Forgot about both Claris and FileMaker. But congrats, Claris! You found a way around pissing people off over subscription pricing for a static product: gouge them on the single license price!
 
Comment

4jasontv

Suspended
Jul 31, 2011
4,072
4,437
The situation is: We need a specific DB that fits our workflow....we don't want to change our workflow to fit off-the-shelf DB options, and we don't have or want devs to create it.

There is not much out there (last I checked) that can hit the sweet spot of power vs ease creation and mods, and works on Macs, Win, and iOS that FM does.

Tell that to photographers.
 
Comment

George Zip

macrumors member
Jan 2, 2011
65
67
I have many databases, simple and not so simple, in FMPro. Several are for work/clients and are part of my daily workflow; very happy it's still a supported app.

Thinking back; it was the first app I officially bought when I started my firm in 1992, running on a PowerBook 160. Dang.

I usually upgrade after a few versions have released, as each usually adds under-the-hood things I don't need/use for my simple databases. I do wish they'd upgrade a few things (like using the system-wide spell-checker; I can *never* get Filemaker's spellcheck to work consistently re/adding words/etc.) and some of the user interface -- which, save for button styles, is exactly the same as I used it nearly 30 years ago.
 
Comment

nwcs

macrumors 68020
Sep 21, 2009
2,023
2,774
Tennessee
TIL file maker is still a thing, and lol it charges $20/user/month.

at this price you can get a real CRM.
That’s really the answer for many people: a proper CRM. Far more features, already built, and scales up/down as needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adib
Comment

erinsarah

macrumors 6502
Mar 17, 2011
369
503
Really, Filemaker is about decent performance with a great UI builder. It's brutally easy to make something that's easy to use, performs well, and needs no maintenance.

They missed the client-server boat, but they could probably have a big niche in mobile/tablet solutions if they wanted to market it that way. I'm still annoyed that they killed Bento, and their pricing is prohibitive, but as an easy way to build database-driven good looking solutions it's still one of the best.

Their problem is they're part of a company again, and it doesn't sound like their management is into the whole "lose money and grow" train. Instead, they're on the "let's milk our existing customers" train.


If this was cheaper and my 50-year-old self had the time or energy to learn it from the ground up, I'd think of all kinds of uses for it - helping my wife track client info for her at home business, building a membership directory for my church, building a personal financial tracking system...but frankly I've got a lot of online streaming TV to watch and learning to build a database is just too far down the list.
 
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.