Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What a pity....

I remember a heavy campaign for Bento in online and print media. Just as another poster had said, now theres is a limbo between the Bento offer and the full fledged FileMaker.

Good luck to the laid-off people....

:):apple:
 
When companies drop software like this they destroy user access to their own user data. It should be illegal for a large company to do this and keep existing. Even in bankruptcy should not allow this. Continued support for the product is a liability that the company should be required to keep up with just like warranties and tax debt. If the company goes out of business then money from the sale of the company assets should be set aside to continue maintenance and the software/hardware should go into the public domain. The same holds for operating systems. Apple should not have been allowed to abandon MacOS Classic, PPC support, 68K support, etc. They can easily emulate all that - as they have proven - and they are so huge they should maintain those so that users can continue to access their data. Life lasts more than just five years. We need a Data Life Guarantee Law since companies are not willing to do this themselves.

It is a criminal travesty that I cannot find the proper ribbon for my smith corona in this day and age. Someone should sue.
 
Life lasts more than just five years. We need a Data Life Guarantee Law since companies are not willing to do this themselves.

Last year I took my black MacBook (2006) into the Apple Store. The CPU fan shrieked like a banshee and the battery bulged out like a pregnant woman. I was expecting the Genius technician to tell me I was so out of luck since I have "vintage" system. Both the CPU fan and battery were replaced. Since the keyboard/trackpad cable got pinched and broke, that got replaced at no charge. I walked out of the Apple Store with an almost brand new laptop. The life of my MacBook got extended for another few years.

Alas, the MacBook has a 32-bit CPU and newer updates for my installed software now require a 64-bit CPU. Should Apple and the developers support 32-bit CPUs after 64-bit CPUs has become common? That would be nice. However, nothing prevents me from moving my data to a newer system. The new MacBook Air looks really nice for my needs.
 
When companies drop software like this they destroy user access to their own user data. It should be illegal for a large company to do this and keep existing. Even in bankruptcy should not allow this. Continued support for the product is a liability that the company should be required to keep up with just like warranties and tax debt. If the company goes out of business then money from the sale of the company assets should be set aside to continue maintenance and the software/hardware should go into the public domain. The same holds for operating systems. Apple should not have been allowed to abandon MacOS Classic, PPC support, 68K support, etc. They can easily emulate all that - as they have proven - and they are so huge they should maintain those so that users can continue to access their data. Life lasts more than just five years. We need a Data Life Guarantee Law since companies are not willing to do this themselves.

Uh... I see where you're trying to go, but I think that you've missed the target by a bit. As others have pointed out, the company choosing to end a product does not instantly make all of their customers unable to run the software anymore. So, no, they are not "destroying" their customers ability to access their data. Over the years, I've visited and worked at many companies that keep legacy hardware around just to run a particular older piece of software that they don't have an update for.

Now, perhaps your could argue that companies should be required to provide some form of data export to prevent total data lock-in, but that's a different issue. If I have gigabytes of data in XYZ databases, and I'm told that XYZ is being discontinued, I now have something of a problem. If XYZ doesn't have a data export function, I now have to nursemaid my XYZ program along until such time as I can pay someone to manually transfer the data to a new database solution. Of course, even with data export, you face problems of how that data is exported. A simple database isn't too hard to represent as a text file, but what about a relational database? What if the database has external links? What about computation fields? Yes, all of these can be overcome on the export end, but then you have to have a new program that can read the export format, or you have to have a translation program that can convert the exported data into the right format to be imported into a new application. All around, not a simple issue.

Now, if you were to try to create laws to require companies to maintain programs, ad nausium, the result would be that the potential liability of creating a program would rapidly outrun the potential benefit, and we'd get a lot fewer programs being written.

On the other hand, cloud services and subscription software are two things that scare me, for precisely the kinds of reasons you touch on. That's the reason that I have no inclination toward any kind of cloud computing service, or using software on a subscription model.
 
My mind still boggles that Apple has a subsidiary company which makes software not under the Apple brand. Is this the remnants of Claris Software? ClarisWorks was a pretty good productivity suite back in the day, much more useful than iWork...
 
Sad news... Bento was great, but the difference in cost to jump upto FileMaker is just not worth the difference for those users who were fine with Bento's feature set - which now leaves them somewhat in a limbo.

If Apple had any gumption they would have taken Bento out of the FileMaker portfolio and actually 'added' it to its iWork suite of apps as the missing database application....

This 1000000 times.
Also, bump up the feature set and bring back the tight OS integration (calendar, contacts, iPhoto) which they plan to phase out and have partly done already. Super stupid decision if you ask me by the way.

Also, I'm SURE AS HELL not going to upgrade to FileMaker now that they apparently couldn't even hold the by-product around and lay off 200 employees.
Sorry, but that is all but trustworthy in my books for an application that's supposed to store hundreds or thousands of database entries.
And I sure can think about more fun things than migrating databases, checking their integrity, losing uptime, losing features, trained workflows and all that.

Bento has been solid for big databases that even need contacts that link to your already existing OS X/iOS Address Book, which made this product a go-to solution even for small businesses and now they essentially drop those features in a product they don't even want to maintain anymore.
(Anyone telling me they still support it isn't thinking about what I'm thinking... Software that isn't sold anymore doesn't get NEAR the quality of support as software that's in active development)


Oh well, to cut a long story short, bye bye FileMaker for now.
That's gonna take some time to gain back that trust you just lost. Funny thing is I was even considering moving to FileMaker in the near future, but not anymore.

Glassed Silver:mac
 
When companies drop software like this they destroy user access to their own user data. It should be illegal for a large company to do this and keep existing. Even in bankruptcy should not allow this. Continued support for the product is a liability that the company should be required to keep up with just like warranties and tax debt. If the company goes out of business then money from the sale of the company assets should be set aside to continue maintenance and the software/hardware should go into the public domain. The same holds for operating systems. Apple should not have been allowed to abandon MacOS Classic, PPC support, 68K support, etc. They can easily emulate all that - as they have proven - and they are so huge they should maintain those so that users can continue to access their data. Life lasts more than just five years. We need a Data Life Guarantee Law since companies are not willing to do this themselves.

So who pays for this?
I run a small game studio (PC and console). What if a new Windows update breaks my game and I've ceased trading because there was no money left. Do I have to quit another job I may have to go back and add support?

You get around this by selling licenses, not the software itself. The license covers the app/game for current hardware on a current operating system; or the one it was designed for.

Obviously it would be nice to support everything forever but it's just not possible apart from the super large corporations.
 
When companies drop software like this they destroy user access to their own user data. It should be illegal for a large company to do this and keep existing. Even in bankruptcy should not allow this. Continued support for the product is a liability that the company should be required to keep up with just like warranties and tax debt. If the company goes out of business then money from the sale of the company assets should be set aside to continue maintenance and the software/hardware should go into the public domain. The same holds for operating systems. Apple should not have been allowed to abandon MacOS Classic, PPC support, 68K support, etc. They can easily emulate all that - as they have proven - and they are so huge they should maintain those so that users can continue to access their data. Life lasts more than just five years. We need a Data Life Guarantee Law since companies are not willing to do this themselves.

Always the answer is more government, more regulation, which we all end up paying for. Why not just know this can happen and adjust your behavior accordingly? Don't rely on cloud storage as your only storage; don't put your data in inaccessible proprietary formats if you don't want to.

If you have this concern, you address it. Don't make me and everyone else pay a little more just to alleviate your fears. We have enough government and regulation, thank you.
 
No data is lost

When companies drop software like this they destroy user access to their own user data. It should be illegal for a large company to do this and keep existing. Even in bankruptcy should not allow this. Continued support for the product is a liability that the company should be required to keep up with just like warranties and tax debt. If the company goes out of business then money from the sale of the company assets should be set aside to continue maintenance and the software/hardware should go into the public domain. The same holds for operating systems. Apple should not have been allowed to abandon MacOS Classic, PPC support, 68K support, etc. They can easily emulate all that - as they have proven - and they are so huge they should maintain those so that users can continue to access their data. Life lasts more than just five years. We need a Data Life Guarantee Law since companies are not willing to do this themselves.

In case of Bento, data is stored in a sqlite db, so any tool that can read a sqlite db allow you to get your data back, export, ...
 
Only time will tell,since I switched to macs in 2007 time and time again over the last few years apple have fallen short and thrown the baby out with the bath water. I've hoped apple would accommodate the small business user since . Mac and migrated to Mobile me they got rid of .Mac groups which I used a lot, then they did away with iWeb and Moileme and hosting making me have to use another web designer again and web hosting site. Now my beloved data base program is under attack. I'm seriously thinking about switching to Windows. Apple love to cut things and leave people high and dry with no options. Being self employed Apple was a god send but over the last few years. Things have got difficult to cope with. With all these changes.


I switched to makes in 2009. I did go back and try a Microsoft product and within the week I was clearly reminded of why I left MS. I was cursing, rebooting, and frustrated by this thing that would hang itself. I realised this was why I switched to Apple. And I'd forgotten how much Apple just worked. MS is a dog. Always has been.
 
Bento always seemed to me like something that Apple could probably have offered themselves as some kind of API that could interact with any CoreData application implements it (to declare which types of data it will share, how they can be used etc.), and for other applications that provide custom implementations for their own backing storage systems.

It could then allow them to simplify interaction with programs by making the API available to AppleScript (no need for apps to add specific AppleScript support), and could handle other data sharing features like getting access to Calendar and Contacts for example.


Erm… I digressed a bit, but yeah Bento seemed more like something Apple should have been doing, rather than expecting developers to add support for a paid third party product.
 
If you have this concern, you address it. Don't make me and everyone else pay a little more just to alleviate your fears. We have enough government and regulation, thank you.

But there are no cars that go 0 to 60 in 4 seconds and get 40 MPG, please Mr. Fed make a law, 'cause then it will surely happen. (BTW, does anyone have John Delorean's phone number? My car won't start and I'll lose my family if I don't get back to 1955.)
 
re: Pros moving

Except I'm not quite sure how moving to Windows is working for people, this late in the game?

Microsoft keeps shoveling Windows 8 on people, despite total Windows 8 adoption rates hovering around the same percentages Vista had. A huge number of companies are still using Windows XP and it's over a decade old!

On the pro audio side of things, many people got the shaft in the Windows world when they moved to a 64-bit edition of Windows (which gradually became the "norm" as people expected their OS to recognize more than 4GB of RAM installed in a given PC). I know my M-Audio Firewire 410, for example, isn't working anymore for people using Windows 8 64-bit edition, and there are no plans for an updated driver.

I agree that the death of Bento isn't a good thing to hear, but we still don't know what will become of the code? As people said, it would make sense for Apple to purchase it and re-release it as part of a new iWork suite. What doesn't make sense is to just let the product die, when it has no real substitute and money could be made selling off the existing source code.


Bento as I'm aware is quite well used. Perhaps just my circle of friends.

Some have Filemaker, but that's only if they have larger businesses.

Another death in Apple's ecosystem. Pro's moving to Windows in their droves. Video editors already dumping their Mac Pro machines for Windows workstations leaving FCP for Premier, audio going the same direction with lack of newer Mac Pro machines, photography just hanging on but lack of CUDA support with Apple only offering AMD may kill them off.

Never looks right when you walk in to a creative business, you see lots of Apple desktops then you look at the admin department and they're all on crappy looking Dell desktops.
 
As people said, it would make sense for Apple to purchase it and re-release it as part of a new iWork suite.

Why would Apple buy it? Filemaker inc, the developer of Bento is a wholly owned subsidiary of Apple. There is no reason for them to ever buy it - they already own it. That and their lack of desire of putting it in iWork in the past makes me think that Apple has no interest whatsoever of including it in iWork ala Access in Office. The two products are miles in difference.
 
yet another example of Apple ignoring it's user base.

Bento lost the ability to integrate with address book and calendar properly in Mountain Lion, as they knew this was coming, so I doubt very much it will be rolled into iWorks, but who knows

personally this looks like the actions of a company that is no longer interested in the software/computer market and only interested in phones and or mass produced consumer products.

well....people want apple stuff because it's cool, when the creative industry no longer uses it, it wont be cool any more as they are the people that show Apple's brand off to the world....

they have shown how little they care when they dropped shake, they pretended they cared with a half hearted FCPX, not sure about logic, but the writing is on the wall for anything good Apple have been involved in...

let's call the Nokia Mk2 now.....

sorry for the rambling rant :mad:
 
Say it's not so -- pleeze

I hope this is just a restructure. Bento is a solid product for those not needing the added features in FileMaker but savvy enough to customize into a necessary and kicking part of daily life.
 
Filemaker inc actually. Filemaker is run by it's own staff and they make their own decisions about products. The decision to discontinue Bento was a decision by Filemaker's management.

your telling me a wholly owned subsidiary of Apple makes it's own 'strategic' decisions..... wow your nieve.....
 
your telling me a wholly owned subsidiary of Apple makes it's own 'strategic' decisions..... wow your nieve.....

From what I understand, they are very autonomous - otherwise Apple would have integrated them officially long ago and it would have been Apple Filemaker.

Filemaker has it's own executive staff and from the looks of it, operates independently. Other than being a subsidiary and probably payroll, Apple keeps them separate.

Let me ask you this? Why would Apple get involved with killing an individual product at Filemaker when Filemaker has their own executive staff to do that. If Apple cared one iota about Bento, they would have taken ownership of it years ago. No, they left it under their subsidiary who killed it themselves.
 
This 1000000 times.
Also, bump up the feature set and bring back the tight OS integration (calendar, contacts, iPhoto) which they plan to phase out and have partly done already. Super stupid decision if you ask me by the way.

Also, I'm SURE AS HELL not going to upgrade to FileMaker now that they apparently couldn't even hold the by-product around and lay off 200 employees.
Sorry, but that is all but trustworthy in my books for an application that's supposed to store hundreds or thousands of database entries.
And I sure can think about more fun things than migrating databases, checking their integrity, losing uptime, losing features, trained workflows and all that.

Bento has been solid for big databases that even need contacts that link to your already existing OS X/iOS Address Book, which made this product a go-to solution even for small businesses and now they essentially drop those features in a product they don't even want to maintain anymore.
(Anyone telling me they still support it isn't thinking about what I'm thinking... Software that isn't sold anymore doesn't get NEAR the quality of support as software that's in active development)


Oh well, to cut a long story short, bye bye FileMaker for now.
That's gonna take some time to gain back that trust you just lost. Funny thing is I was even considering moving to FileMaker in the near future, but not anymore.

Glassed Silver:mac

They laid off 20 employees, which is bad, but less terrible than 200.

Bento will work as well on current hardware/software a year from now as it does now.

I tried Bento a few times, but it was never the right software for my particular needs. I can only imagine if a piece of software I used regularly was discontinued by the developer. It would suck, to be perfectly honest, and it's be a tremendous pain to move all that data to another program/platform.

I'm hopeful that a slightly different piece of software is developed, by Filemaker, Apple, or someone else, to fill the void. Maybe that software will fill your current/future needs, as well as mine. Only time will tell.

As for Filemaker, I don't think that cutting Bento will greatly affect the Filemaker products. Perhaps they wanted to refine their business focus on creating the best business-class database product they're able to. If that's their focus, Bento was something of an orphan product.
 
When companies drop software like this they destroy user access to their own user data. It should be illegal for a large company to do this and keep existing. Even in bankruptcy should not allow this. Continued support for the product is a liability that the company should be required to keep up with just like warranties and tax debt. If the company goes out of business then money from the sale of the company assets should be set aside to continue maintenance and the software/hardware should go into the public domain. The same holds for operating systems. Apple should not have been allowed to abandon MacOS Classic, PPC support, 68K support, etc. They can easily emulate all that - as they have proven - and they are so huge they should maintain those so that users can continue to access their data. Life lasts more than just five years. We need a Data Life Guarantee Law since companies are not willing to do this themselves.

Which is precisely why I run VMs, so I can continue to run older software while still upgrading my hardware.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.