Probably because they want to centralize where everyone(windows users) gets their iTunes update.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Final Cut Pro 4.1.1, LiveType 1.1.1, Xcode 1.1
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Probably because they want to centralize where everyone(windows users) gets their iTunes update.
Catfish_Man
macrumors 68030
I was puzzled why there was not an iTunes or Xcode update in Software Update. Anyone with the Xcode update experence any problems or reasons for them to recall it?
I don't know if this is pertinent, but I'm in the UK on an iMac G4 running OS 10.3.2 and iTunes 4.2 showed up in my software update along with Quicktime 6.5.
ZildjianKX
macrumors 68000
iTunes 4.2 finally showed up for me...
Kinda bummed Xcode 1.1 was pulled, I really want to try the new version...
Also dissapointed that there are all these updates, and Apple has still neglected to fix the bugged out iPod firmware they released awhile ago... 🙁
Kinda bummed Xcode 1.1 was pulled, I really want to try the new version...
Also dissapointed that there are all these updates, and Apple has still neglected to fix the bugged out iPod firmware they released awhile ago... 🙁
damn. i missed the xcode update. Im also a java developer (prefer c and c++ though 😉 ). Can anyone with XCode 1.1 tell me if they now have codecompletion working with Java yet?? Maybe it's me, but codesense, codecompletion whatever they call it works great in c and c++ but nada for Java. Also the syntax highlighting for Java could be majorly improved. Here's hoping!
By the way the person who recommended eclipse, good call. its real nice, however, .... on os x, its a pain in the back side because its so slow.
By the way the person who recommended eclipse, good call. its real nice, however, .... on os x, its a pain in the back side because its so slow.
rspress
macrumors member
Can't say for sure but codesense was part of the update.
You can find more info on the update here:
https://www.macrumors.com/pages/2003/12/20031218162841.shtml
They're not "updates"
These aren't "updates". They're bug fixes. Let's be honest for once. If Micro$oft did this, y'all would be laughing at how bad the "new OS" is, and how it needs to be patched, patched, patched.
It's not a bad thing. But a little intellectual honesty would be nice right now.
These aren't "updates". They're bug fixes. Let's be honest for once. If Micro$oft did this, y'all would be laughing at how bad the "new OS" is, and how it needs to be patched, patched, patched.
It's not a bad thing. But a little intellectual honesty would be nice right now.
stcanard
macrumors 65816
Re: They're not "updates"
Yes and no.
Some of this is "bugfixes". Although I have not run into the bugs they are fixing, so they are obviously not widespread. That kind of bug is expected.
Some of what is coming is "updates" because it's adding or improving functionality (c.f. the ATI driver updates in 10.3.2 -- I was happy with my performance before, therefore this is an update)
I just commented to a friend yesterday. The difference between Apple updates and MS updates (and why I complain bitterly about MS while anticipating Apple):
After the last several updates on my XP machine I have either seen no difference, or a decrease in performance
After the last several updates on my PB I have more features, a faster OS, and an extra 1/2 hour of battery.
Yes and no.
Some of this is "bugfixes". Although I have not run into the bugs they are fixing, so they are obviously not widespread. That kind of bug is expected.
Some of what is coming is "updates" because it's adding or improving functionality (c.f. the ATI driver updates in 10.3.2 -- I was happy with my performance before, therefore this is an update)
I just commented to a friend yesterday. The difference between Apple updates and MS updates (and why I complain bitterly about MS while anticipating Apple):
After the last several updates on my XP machine I have either seen no difference, or a decrease in performance
After the last several updates on my PB I have more features, a faster OS, and an extra 1/2 hour of battery.
Does anybody know of a site that is hosting the XCode 1.1 that was pulled.
It isn't on software update, and is'nt on ADC.
It isn't on software update, and is'nt on ADC.
No, CodeSense for Java is in the "planning" stages, according to posts from Apple on the xcode-users list.
It's not exactly wonderful for C++, either (doesn't prioritize a class's methods; "g" [curly-.] displays about a thousand items before your first "getter" ...). Obj-C and straight C are Apple's priorities, as they always have been ...
XCode 1.1 was pulled for problems with Software Update servers. The "second" 1.1 was no different than the "first" 1.1 update; the rules on the server were modified. Perhaps to make it easier on the updates servers, or perhaps to make sure people don't see 1.1 if they don't have XCode installed at all ... I'm not sure.
This is coming from senior Apple dev tools people posting on the XCode-Users mailing list ...
