Originally posted by mahermusic
"I have found Sibelius a powerful and effective tool"
Michael Tilson Thomas
conductor & composer
Um.... I'd put a little more weight behind Thomas, then ..... Marsalis
Originally posted by mahermusic
"I have found Sibelius a powerful and effective tool"
Michael Tilson Thomas
conductor & composer
Um.... I'd put a little more weight behind Thomas, then ..... Marsalis
Originally posted by mahermusic
Its Berklee COLLEGE of Music, and I'd put more weight behind Temple University's Esther Boyer College of Music over Berklee ANY DAY.
Temple, by the way, uses Sibelius.
Oh, and PLEASE don't start with Warner Bros. I can tell they use Finale with all the mistakes in their scores and parts. Ives' "Second Symphony" and "The Wizard of Oz" are so chock full of lovelies that I have to stop a rehearsal just to fix notation errors.
Originally posted by mahermusic
Silly person, here are your answers:
1- Never heard of Temple University? You're only embarassing yourself. I'll let you alone on that one. (Might want to double-check your spelling of "heard". They teach College Composition at Temple as well...)
...You're out of your league on this one, buddy. Goodbye.
Originally posted by mahermusic
Um.... I'd put a little more weight behind Thomas, then ..... Marsalis
Originally posted by mahermusic
Yes, it MUST be IYHO, because, not only do we understand that Sibelius is FAR SUPERIOR to finale, Sibelius was carbonized for OS X a full TWO YEARS before finale.
"Dreamers never achieve"
PLEASE don't talk to us about finale being superior... in its OS 9 state. Not only is it making you look silly, but the reason Sibelius is on top is because finale STILL has not released a OS X version.
Reality hurts.
Originally posted by mahermusic
Yes, it MUST be IYHO, because, not only do we understand that Sibelius is FAR SUPERIOR to finale, Sibelius was carbonized for OS X a full TWO YEARS before finale.
"Dreamers never achieve"
PLEASE don't talk to us about finale being superior... in its OS 9 state. Not only is it making you look silly, but the reason Sibelius is on top is because finale STILL has not released a OS X version.
Reality hurts.
I still know people using Protools on OS 9. In fact, I recorded in a studio using Protools on a Mac 9500 under OS 9 this past MAY. Does it mean Protools sucks or is inferior because it doesn't run on OS X? Not at all.
Originally posted by mahermusic
Tough, ain't it? See, now when I brought home a demo copy of finale at MENC this past year, things were so awkward, and slow, that I found it counter-productive. I understood why all of the Music Colleges up in my area switched over to Sibelius. Sending the parts that I wrote to my .Mac website was faster (for some reason... should be the same), and the overall feel of finale was uninspiring. Sibelius reminds me more of the Mac itself... I can do ANYTHING that I need it to do, easier and faster!!!
Originally posted by ericdano
Wait, you come off as the "authority" in previous posts, then now admit you had a DEMO copy. How long did you use it? 10 Minutes? Try the manual? Watch the demo videos? Didn't think so.
I own BOTH. Sibelius is collection virtual dust on my Hard Drive.
When you actually TRY to use Finale, then maybe you can come back and state your opinions. I tried to use Sibelius. I have 2 charts I wrote in it. And that was it. I was fighting the program left and right. I couldn't get it to format right, articulations were not right, etc. It was back to Finale after that.