Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
i'd love a 5870 for my MP1,1 seeing as my flashed 4870 has recently died :(
 
+1 for a 5870 here in my '06 Pro. A new GPU and half a dozen gig more RAM and my Pro will keep rocking for another 2 years!

If I had got an iMac back when I was in Uni 4 years ago, I would:

a) have not produced work as fast as I did with my Pro
b) not been able to upgrade it so extensively (despite limited official GPU choices) and certainly wouldn’t have been able to plug 4.5 Tb of disk space into it!
c) would have already been forced to replace it with a new model!

Love my Pro!
 
HD5870 is also great only 27W in idle !
Where are you getting that figure? Charts I've seen show the 5870 consuming around 150W idle!

And here I was hoping to get a performance card that wouldn't increase idle consumption much more than the 2008's stock, weak 2600 (~13W IIRC), one of the reasons I hadn't gone for the 285... :(
 
+2 for a 5870 for my 2008 MP as well! As several people have pointed out, there is a very real possibility that there will be a considerable amount of Apple Tax applied to the final price, so it may be more worthwhile to go with a PC card flashed with the 5870 BIOS.

Right now the lowest price for a PC-5870 is $379.99, but the average is $400. now that is a full-RETAIL 5870xt with an 850MHz core clock and 1200MHz memory clock.
Who knows what Apple's will be clocked at???

Newegg 5870's

Cindori, Rominator, netkas, and others should be working on it when the Apple 5870's hit the streets and someone provides them with the ROM dump. :D
I know I speak for others when I say their work is VERY appreciated!
 
I've mentioned this before, but it may be possible that  will sell the 5870 at original MSRP - supply on the 58xx series cards has been constrained and demand so great that the cards have been selling at MSRP or higher, frequently.

Intriugingly, the reason the  tax is so harsh is that  insists on selling at original MSRP for the high end cards - whose prices actually start quite high - long after their prices have dropped to half of that. In this case, they might actually be selling the card at what other retailers charge.

This, of course, assumes that ATI isn't about to start selling a new release, causing prices to drop like a stone, leaving us with a hefty  overcharging. It's quite plausible.

What I'm more curious about, right now, is the three-monitor support. I know we won't have Eyefinity or anything quite like it, but all the same I'm curious - will this support three dual-link DVI equivalent displays? How well will that work? etc., etc.
 
Right, that much I know from what I've read already. But will that work fully in OS X? Will we be able to use MDP to DP converters for full functionality?
 
Where are you getting that figure? Charts I've seen show the 5870 consuming around 150W idle!
Just a follow-up: it would seem I've gravely misread the chart, which displays the total power consumption of the test computer, not just the card. That's rather counterintuitive (useless?), but having now looked at the card's review article, it means the poster I originally quoted was correct. :)
 
Back on topic...

This isn't looking good for us Mac Pro 1.1 owners.
The radeons in the new iMacs have 64-bit EFI. :(

There's a very high probability that desktop cards will have 64-bit EFI too, unless their firmware are developed by different people (say Apple vs. AMD), which I doubt.

I'm pissed. :mad:
 
What is the current recommendation for MacPro1,1 owners?

An Apple 5770? A flashed (4xxx) PC card? Or do we need to wait to see?
 
And here I was hoping to get a performance card that wouldn't increase idle consumption much more than the 2008's stock, weak 2600 (~13W IIRC), one of the reasons I hadn't gone for the 285... :(

If I remember correctly, there was an ambiguous firmware update for the 2600, which resolved some sleep issues but it increased the idle power consumption considerably (basically, it disabled some low-power states).
My card was noisier after the update and consumes almost 20W more. So I think that the 5870 will consume even less than an "updated" 2600...
 
If I remember correctly, there was an ambiguous firmware update for the 2600, which resolved some sleep issues but it increased the idle power consumption considerably (basically, it disabled some low-power states).
My card was noisier after the update and consumes almost 20W more. So I think that the 5870 will consume even less than an "updated" 2600...

Not sure if this power increase was related to firmware... as toggling between 10.5.2 and a later version of the OS switches the problem on and off... also, while I have the problem - others such as Alifhar do not under 10.6.4...
 
All these people (including myself) hoping that these new cards work in our Mac Pro 1,1 systems just shows what a good buy that machine was back in 2006.

It may have been expensive, but we're still using them four years later, and for many of us they are still more than fast enough. I know mine still feels like it screams when it comes to performance.

If the new cards DO work in the new Mac Pros it will just underscore what an excellent buy these were. A new Radeon 5xxx will likely extend the lifetime of my machine another two years. Of course, Apple probably doesn't want this, even if they DO end up actually selling me the 5xxx!


I hope this is the case, and the 5000 series works properly in the 2006 1,1 MacPro's, If it does.... Im long overdue for a graphics upgrade, OpenGL 3.2 and.... OpenCL !!

i belive not, it looks like the 2010 macpro motherboard is identical to 2009
(this basically means that the core difference between a 2009 macpro and 2010 mac pro is just a couple of bytes of data on the efi chip to support new cpu's...)

and that means that you have only 2 PCIE power ports on the mobo, giving enough power for only one 5870


i'm starting to think about flashing 2009 mac pro with 2010 EFI to enable support for new CPU's.
the tool to flash EFI is actually extractable from a former firmware update, so in theory it would work.
but, i do not know of any way to extract the 2010 efi.
however, when apple releases a firmware update for 2010 macpro (maybe 6 months from now) to fix maybe a bug or something, one could theoretically use that efi to flash on a 2009 mac pro and essentially turn it into a 2010 mac pro.

i will look more into this when time and tools are given to me, right now my only computer is my fathers 2007 mac mini.

I wonder if the 2006 1,1 and 2008 are similar and could be flashed to get EFI64 ?? Now would be GREAT!!! (I think thats just dreaming though....) :)

It is completely up to whether the cards support the EFI on the machine's motherboard.

All Mac OS X installations of a particular build (note BUILD, not version) are identical. The reason for this is that you can move an OS X installation from any Mac to any other Mac without having driver problems and incompatibilities.

Therefore, once 10.6.5 hits, all Macs will support the new ATI cards... in Mac OS X. The problem is EFI, which initializes the card at boot. Different Mac Pros have different EFI versions. The biggest division is EFI32 and EFI64; the very first Mac Pro models use EFI32. Nvidia has been lacking in support for EFI32 in all Mac cards they've manufactured since the first Mac Pro.

ATI on the other hand has supported both EFI32 and EFI64 in all their card revisions. This is why you can use the Apple branded ATI 2xxx, 3xxx, and 4xxx cards in every Mac Pro ever made. The question here is whether ATI will continue this for the 5xxx series.

It just seems daft to me, Selling a Machine with a fully 64-bit capable CPU architecture, and just having a EFI32...? Dumb decision on Apples part I think, just does not seem logical. I hope REALLY REALLY hope they update ALL the MacPros including the 2006 1,1 to have a universal EFI. :cool:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.