But it's not. It's neither comparable nor analogous. You're attempting to equate multiple felonies with a non-crime. At worst, trademark infringement results in a lawsuit for unfair competition. That didn't even happen in this case. (As for your "land of the internet lawyers" crack - no, I'm a lawyer in meatspace, too - an intellectual property lawyer, in fact).
And there are two ways to look at your inability to find some action by Apple that roughly equates. I submit that the most likely source of this inability is that Apple hasn't actually done anything roughly comparable, and there is no hypocrisy and no reality distortion at work here.