Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
69,264
40,283


Firefox for iOS 26 will get a new "Shake to Summarize" feature that generates an AI summary of a webpage when iPhone users shake their device. The feature uses the on-device language models that power Apple Intelligence, but it isn't limited to iPhone 15 Pro and newer.

shake-to-summarize-fire-fox-summaries.jpeg

On older devices that don't support Apple Intelligence, the feature defaults to Mozilla's cloud-based AI, which creates a summary and then sends it back to iPhone. Here's how it works:
  • Shake your device.
  • Tap the thunderbolt icon in the address bar.
  • Or, from the menu, tap the three dots, then tap Summarize Page.
The announcement makes Firefox one of the first major third-party apps to integrate with Apple Intelligence. The feature can be disabled to avoid unintended summaries, and it only works on webpages containing up to 5,000 words.

Firefox says Shake to Summarize starts rolling out this week in the U.S. for English-language users, with more languages and regions to follow.

Article Link: Firefox 'Shake to Summarize' Webpage Feature Uses Apple Intelligence
 
Enough with the stuff popping up by accidental actions. The touched too long, too short, double touched, etc. AI adding to my calendar event. Very annoying. If I need a new Calendar event, more than capable to add it. If I fail to add a calendar event, a life lesson learned will happen. Apple intelligence label today Apple Annoyance.
 
Enough with the stuff popping up by accidental actions. The touched too long, too short, double touched, etc. AI adding to my calendar event. Very annoying. If I need a new Calendar event, more than capable to add it. If I fail to add a calendar event, a life lesson learned will happen. Apple intelligence label today Apple Annoyance.
One of the things that tempts me to go back to Android is being able to have a dedicated back and home button. Not to mention the current swipe down iOS gestures - want to change settings, swipe down! No, not from anywhere, from a specific undefined corner (but don't swipe down too far because the same gesture will start cycling you through different sections!)! The dumbing down of UIs to accommodate touch has been the downfall of modern computing.
 
It's like Mozilla is intentionally chasing users away from their products. On my laptop and desktop computers, I've already applied BetterFox settings to get rid of AI and other 'features' Mozilla has laden the browser with. We have no such opportunity with mobile version.

Yeah, yeah - use Safari, I hear some say. A proprietary nanny-based browser that does not serve my needs. Or Chrome - certainly not Google`s "What's yours is ours" browser, but I will admit to the occasional use of Vivaldi, a version with EU security and privacy considerations built-in.
Still, what's so hard about building a browser that just works?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: artifex and dricci
I'm surprised the app store approved this- it seems like it violates the Human Interface Guidelines- the shake action is clearly established in most apps and apple betas as a gesture to give feedback on bugs.
 
I have never ever understood the “shake entire phone” as a gesture. I think iPhones used to (maybe still do?) support shake to undo. This always seemed horrible. Why would I want to shake my phone to intentionally do something.

Obviously in this case there are other ways to trigger the summarize action but I really hope this shake gesture isn’t making a comeback.
 
I have never ever understood the “shake entire phone” as a gesture. I think iPhones used to (maybe still do?) support shake to undo. This always seemed horrible. Why would I want to shake my phone to intentionally do something.
Agreed. Modern phones have a surprising amount of inertia thanks to their heavy batteries, and shaking them is just an unpleasant sensation.
 
What a waste of time.

I can't imagine wanting to do this, even one single time.
If I got paid by the word for reading the endless droll that many/most articles are, just like the writers who get paid by the word, then maybe I could force myself to sit through paragraphs of useless information just to find the meat of the matter. I guess some people, like you, prefer to read 20 paragraphs of an article that really could have been said in 1. But then the writer wouldn't get paid much.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.