Should they have kept it? More FW ports?
Yep, makes no difference. FW800 is backward compatible, and if you have more than one device, you just daisy-chain. Simple. Simplification.
Should they have kept it? More FW ports?
I know tons of Mac users, and to tell you the truth, not that many people use FW. You only hear about the few that complain about it being taken away. The vast majority if users go with USB because no matter what it is, USB is always cheaper and the speed boost you gain from FW400 vs, USB usually isn't worth the extra price paid.
As far as FW800 goes, then that is a different story. No one on a MacBook had that anyway. For that, you'd use a MacBook Pro or a Mac Pro.
I don't get the choices in this poll. Firewire is entirely gone from the new MacBook -- I thought that was the significant departure from the past.
The loss of Target Disk Mode on these new MacBooks is the biggest issue I can see. That's really unfortunate -- it can be such a life-saver.
What? What you mean it's gone? Didn't you know you can have a FW800 → FW400 Cable and still use the FW800 element? Just means you'll need to invest in more cables.
I don't really use the FW400 socket all that much, I actually run out of FW800 ports, which is rather annoying. Though, IF you folks really need more FW ports, why not invest in an ExpressCard FW400/800 card? Then you needn't worry about daisy chaining, dropped frames or what have you.. and you can even get a FW800 Hub!
![]()
![]()
http://www.lacie.com/jpen/products/product.htm?id=10296
Problem solved...
Jesus, what if you had brains?
I use FW400 for my iPod among other things.![]()
The express card option is the best way to split the Bus, but allot of people use there express card slot for things at the same time.
3G Card? XD CAM Memory Cards....