Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
First '45mm' Apple Watch Bands Spotted Ahead of Series 7 Unveiling [Updated]
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
It would indeed be worth watching.
I'm still pretty happy with my series 4. The battery health is still at 90% almost 3 years after I bought it, and since I got a decent case for it, it hasn't a scratch.
I can't really see any compelling reason to upgrade from a 4 to the rumors about the 7.
There aren’t as many $100/$200/$300/and up, phone cases out there.
Aftermarket watchband sellers would be tickled pink if people needed new bands for the 45mm. That’s a whole new market for them.
Watchbands are a huge revenue opportunity for everyone producing them. If Apple wasn’t making money on them then they wouldn’t be investing as much time and money on them as they have been. Heck I bet even the cheap Chinese knockoffs are bringing in some serious coinage.
Hopeful the S7 casing is compatible with existing/old bands, and that the design lasts 3 series like the last two case designs. That would mean complete band compatibility through series 9, at least.
I have an SE, and likely won’t upgrade until S8 or 9, and keep that unit for another three years. Soooo— hopefully my bands remain useful for at least 5-6 years, and beyond. Perhaps a 2024 SE model would still use the S7 chassis for cost savings, etc, and extend that compatibility timeframe even more!
I have an SE, and likely won’t upgrade until S8 or 9, and keep that unit for another three years. Soooo— hopefully my bands remain useful for at least 5-6 years, and beyond. Perhaps a 2024 SE model would still use the S7 chassis for cost savings, etc, and extend that compatibility timeframe even more!
Last edited:
I’m not sure what size I should get. If it was a traditional watch, I go no larger than 38mm, but as these devices hold a completely different use case with rich densely packed information, the larger size seems more useful.
but I guess we have to wait and see them in person on try them on to decide which size is best for each of us.
but I guess we have to wait and see them in person on try them on to decide which size is best for each of us.
And probably why it’s only 1 mm bigger this time. Imagine the chaos if the old wide bands had the same labeling as the new narrower bands
I guess if a less informed consumer buys a new 45mm and then later wants to buy a new strap they won’t be confused by seeing a “44mm” label.
"since the device's size name refers to the size of the display rather than the size of the casing"
Surely this is incorrect. The 44mm Apple Watch is 44mm x 38mmcase with a 45.2mm screen. The 40mm Watch is 40mm x 34mm case with a 39mm screen. The device name has always been the case size on the apple watch - odd error to make but I've seen it repeated on a few sites now.
Surely this is incorrect. The 44mm Apple Watch is 44mm x 38mmcase with a 45.2mm screen. The 40mm Watch is 40mm x 34mm case with a 39mm screen. The device name has always been the case size on the apple watch - odd error to make but I've seen it repeated on a few sites now.
Apple Watches are already function over form, and they look pretty bad but are very convenient. An Apple Watch in case must be ugly as sin.
Is Apple planning a third size? Because having a small option used to be one of the great things about the Apple Watch.
Maybe next year's Series 8 could come in 37 (new size, new bands required) + 41 + 45.
Maybe next year's Series 8 could come in 37 (new size, new bands required) + 41 + 45.
Why not just call the bands small/large, or wide/narrow. Changing the specific mm measure every few year is just confusing if the bands are still forward and backwards compatible.
As I’m not from the US I don’t associate mm with weapons ;-)
But why is this listed in mm? Don’t you have some weird unit, like “ants”, to measure small things in the imperial system?
I was wondering just that, it's interesting. I'll be upgrading from a S1 this year (yes, finally), so I was thinking maybe the small watch might be better for me this time. I'm pretty fine with the screen size I have now. It'll be worth checking out both before I actually order either one.
Considering this new design will last at least for 3 models, and given that some leakers said old bands will be compatible, this means that band compatibility will last from April 2015 to August 2024 at least (possibly even more).
9 years.
I remember back in 2015 some people were concerned that then-current bands would become useless pretty quickly because of broken compatibility with subsequent models, and that Apple would even leverage this to force user to buy new bands.
Such a solid “band ecosystem” is one of the “X factors” that makes the Apple Watch leaps better than other attempts at wrist gizmos.
9 years.
I remember back in 2015 some people were concerned that then-current bands would become useless pretty quickly because of broken compatibility with subsequent models, and that Apple would even leverage this to force user to buy new bands.
Such a solid “band ecosystem” is one of the “X factors” that makes the Apple Watch leaps better than other attempts at wrist gizmos.
Not a chance. Apple wants people to want to collect bands, and they won't do that if their collection might be useless a year or two later.
The report is about the case size being 41/45mm and MacRumors keeps calling it screen size, the mm measurement on an Apple Watch measures the case length not the screen. The 40mm watch is physically bigger than the 38mm. A 41mm watch will be 1mm (give or take rounding) longer in length than the 40mm watch.
No... The size of an Apple Watch is the vertical height of the case, not the screen. So the smallest case for Series 7 (40mm) is closer in size to the largest case for Series 0/1 (42mm).
The bands don't really have anything to do with the model's "size" (vertical height). It's the width that matters. Just as an example, they could develop a 70mm & 80mm Apple Watch, but still keep the widths the same so that existing bands will fit. (Obviously a watch like this wouldn't exist; it's just to show that the bands depend the width of the case, not the model's "size".) This is how all the bands we have today are still compatible. Even though the sizes (heights) have changed in the past, the widths of the case have mostly remained the same.
I hope apple brings back the stainless steel space black seeing as we will see matte black on the new iphones
I see zero reason to upgrade this year. I get tremendous battery life with my series 6, I have a ton of bands I can use with it, and watch OS8 is literally a nothing upgrade. The design will probably look cool but I’m just not feeling the upgrade this year unless some crazy feature is announced.