For me, there’d be great value in the Bluetooth connectivity to be able to use the HomePod as a sound system for our Peloton bike that only supports Bluetooth and 3.5mm AUX. Neither of which HomePod supports. Still using an old iPod HiFi plugged into the AUX port for that one.Seriously. About the only thing I can think of is bluetooth accessibility would make it easier for androids to stream music to it. As has been pointed out, IOS and Macs have airplay for streaming to it. So what else?
You should sell your Peleton and just use Apple Fitness+. Apple is the only acceptable product to have in your house.For me, there’d be great value in the Bluetooth connectivity to be able to use the HomePod as a sound system for our Peloton bike that only supports Bluetooth and 3.5mm AUX. Neither of which HomePod supports. Still using an old iPod HiFi plugged into the AUX port for that one.
I’m missing what Bluetooth would allow that you can’t already do.
But it runs airplay perfectly, so what is the point? Airplay is far superior to bluetooth
If I want to use the Homepod as a speaker(s) for a Mac, then Airplay carries quite a lot of latency for anything such as system sounds, sounds coming from your browser etc. This can be 1 - 2 seconds.I’m missing what Bluetooth would allow that you can’t already do.
I’m missing what Bluetooth would allow that you can’t already do.
Those are the languages of Siri, HomePod only supports a subset of it. My language is available in Siri but not on the HomePod, hence HomePod is not available in my country.They support 21 languages, about half of what google does and way more than Alexa's 8.
![]()
Language Support in Voice Assistants Compared (2021 Update)
We compared language support in Siri, HomePod, Alexa, and Google Assistant. Find out who covers the most languages and dialects worldwide.www.globalme.net
You already can right in the HomePod settings.It would be interesting to be able to change the language. that would be tempting
You use the sarcasm tag, and I know you meant it sarcastically, but spend enough time on MacRumors and you start to get the slightly creepy feeling that there are a lot of people that actually live their lives this way: Brand first, all factors second.You should sell your Peleton and just use Apple Fitness+. Apple is the only acceptable product to have in your house.
/sarcasm
As was said in the previous thread regarding the workaround to get stereo HomePods working on Mac; Youtube works in sync through Safari. System sounds and many other sounds do not however.If I want to use the Homepod as a speaker(s) for a Mac, then Airplay carries quite a lot of latency for anything such as system sounds, sounds coming from your browser etc. This can be 1 - 2 seconds.
Given lots of people use youtube on their Mac's, this makes a Homepod a non starter as a speaker for your Mac.
Bluetooth would resolve this, if implemented in the same fashion as AirPods.
You could even have a pair running in stereo (just like AirPods). The hardware is there.
I seriously doubt there are many, if any, really potential customers not buying this because of a lack of Bluetooth. If you want a bluetooth speaker with serious sound, you can get one with an 8" woofer and stereo pairing capability for $90 at Costco. Oh, but you want Siri and HomeKit? Then you must have an iPhone and probably other Apple devices and AirPlay is superior in almost every way.Wish Apple just opened up this thing on their own, so stuff like this wouldn't even be considered. Especially for something simple as connecting to it with bluetooth to play music, something the cheapest wireless speakers can do. I'm sure they would sell more of them too then. Their ''my way or the highway'' approach is what often turns off a lot of potential customers.
funny you know more than than one of the most successful companies ever,Wish Apple just opened up this thing on their own, so stuff like this wouldn't even be considered. Especially for something simple as connecting to it with bluetooth to play music, something the cheapest wireless speakers can do. I'm sure they would sell more of them too then. Their ''my way or the highway'' approach is what often turns off a lot of potential customers.
I don’t think so, that’s only your feeling. People who just want to connect to a Bluetooth speaker to play music won’t consider a HomePod as their are many alternatives available.Wish Apple just opened up this thing on their own, so stuff like this wouldn't even be considered. Especially for something simple as connecting to it with bluetooth to play music, something the cheapest wireless speakers can do. I'm sure they would sell more of them too then. Their ''my way or the highway'' approach is what often turns off a lot of potential customers.
I seriously doubt there are many, if any, really potential customers not buying this because of a lack of Bluetooth. If you want a bluetooth speaker with serious sound, you can get one with an 8" woofer and stereo pairing capability for $90 at Costco. Oh, but you want Siri and HomeKit? Then you must have an iPhone and probably other Apple devices and AirPlay is superior in almost every way.
TL/DR: For some, bluetooth might feel like a nice-to-have, but I doubt any appreciable number are refraining from buying a HomePod because of it.
I feel like your response to me is more about ‘what Bluetooth would allow that you can’t already do’ than what I actually said? I was responding to a comment that there would have been be any appreciable change in HomePod sales if Bluetooth had been available. Which I don't believe is true, for (subjective) reasons stated in my comment.I’m not saying you’re wrong. But the question posed earlier in the thread was ‘what Bluetooth would allow that you can’t already do’?. And then everybody started talking about it. And the answer to that is lag free audio.
My wasmachine can't be hacked, it is *connected.If it can be connected, it can be hacked
Can it run Doom?
![]()