7 762999 Cancelled Original poster Sep 25, 2013 #1 seems ligit 2013 imac 21" - i5 2.7ghz score : 9157 LINK 2012 imac 21" - i5 2.9ghz score : 8893 LINK I didn't find the others yet.
seems ligit 2013 imac 21" - i5 2.7ghz score : 9157 LINK 2012 imac 21" - i5 2.9ghz score : 8893 LINK I didn't find the others yet.
mmomega Suspended Sep 25, 2013 #2 the 2012 27" ran a 12,000+ on 32-bit Geekbench. I'm interested to see what the new i7 does. I don't think it will be much over 13k 32bit. Maybe just break 15k in 64bit
the 2012 27" ran a 12,000+ on 32-bit Geekbench. I'm interested to see what the new i7 does. I don't think it will be much over 13k 32bit. Maybe just break 15k in 64bit
7 762999 Cancelled Original poster Sep 25, 2013 #3 mmomega said: the 2012 27" ran a 12,000+ on 32-bit Geekbench. I'm interested to see what the new i7 does. I don't think it will be much over 13k 32bit. Maybe just break 15k in 64bit Click to expand... the ssd is reported to be 1.5x faster.. this could help the 2013 one to feel snappier under heavy load.
mmomega said: the 2012 27" ran a 12,000+ on 32-bit Geekbench. I'm interested to see what the new i7 does. I don't think it will be much over 13k 32bit. Maybe just break 15k in 64bit Click to expand... the ssd is reported to be 1.5x faster.. this could help the 2013 one to feel snappier under heavy load.
Takuro macrumors 6502a Sep 25, 2013 #4 Those Geekbench scores seem a bit on the low-end. There was actually an earlier thread with Geekbench scores for the 27" i7 iMac that leaked ahead of the launch. 13757 sounds much more reasonable. https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1617139/
Those Geekbench scores seem a bit on the low-end. There was actually an earlier thread with Geekbench scores for the 27" i7 iMac that leaked ahead of the launch. 13757 sounds much more reasonable. https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1617139/
7 762999 Cancelled Original poster Sep 25, 2013 #5 Takuro said: Those Geekbench scores seem a bit on the low-end. There was actually an earlier thread with Geekbench scores for the 27" i7 iMac that leaked ahead of the launch. 13757 sounds much more reasonable. https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1617139/ Click to expand... that was a fake, it's a hackingtosh score..
Takuro said: Those Geekbench scores seem a bit on the low-end. There was actually an earlier thread with Geekbench scores for the 27" i7 iMac that leaked ahead of the launch. 13757 sounds much more reasonable. https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1617139/ Click to expand... that was a fake, it's a hackingtosh score..
Mr. Retrofire macrumors 603 Sep 25, 2013 #6 slayerizer said: the ssd is reported to be 1.5x faster.. this could help the 2013 one to feel snappier under heavy load. Click to expand... Nonsense. The SSD has nothing to do with the CPU.
slayerizer said: the ssd is reported to be 1.5x faster.. this could help the 2013 one to feel snappier under heavy load. Click to expand... Nonsense. The SSD has nothing to do with the CPU.
fig macrumors 6502a Sep 25, 2013 #7 Mr. Retrofire said: Nonsense. The SSD has nothing to do with the CPU. Click to expand... It would feel snappier with the Fusion drive vs a traditional drive, that just won't affect the Geekbench score at all.
Mr. Retrofire said: Nonsense. The SSD has nothing to do with the CPU. Click to expand... It would feel snappier with the Fusion drive vs a traditional drive, that just won't affect the Geekbench score at all.
T Toraen macrumors member Sep 26, 2013 #8 Also keep in mind that Haswell is not a huge CPU performance increase. It's mainly power consumption + GPU performance.
Also keep in mind that Haswell is not a huge CPU performance increase. It's mainly power consumption + GPU performance.
B blanka macrumors 68000 Sep 26, 2013 #9 I really wonder what SSD chips Apple uses. For example, if they are Samsung 840 ones, the read speed on PCIE might be like 1.2GB/s and Apple will call it twice as fast, but write will still be around 300MB/S. Does anybody have info on that?
I really wonder what SSD chips Apple uses. For example, if they are Samsung 840 ones, the read speed on PCIE might be like 1.2GB/s and Apple will call it twice as fast, but write will still be around 300MB/S. Does anybody have info on that?
n-evo macrumors 68020 Sep 26, 2013 #10 Takuro said: Those Geekbench scores seem a bit on the low-end. Click to expand... Keep in mind they used the 32-bit version of Geekbench. Those results always turn out lower than the 64-bit test.
Takuro said: Those Geekbench scores seem a bit on the low-end. Click to expand... Keep in mind they used the 32-bit version of Geekbench. Those results always turn out lower than the 64-bit test.
R RoryO macrumors member Sep 26, 2013 #11 More Benchmarks Looks like a few more bench marks coming in... http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/search?q=imac14 According to http://www.anandtech.com/show/7365/apple-updates-the-imac-haswell-cpus-pcie-ssds-80211ac-wifi i5-4570R = Base model 21" i5-4570 = Base model 27" i5-4670 = Mid range 27" i7-4771 = Top End 27" Last edited: Sep 26, 2013
More Benchmarks Looks like a few more bench marks coming in... http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/search?q=imac14 According to http://www.anandtech.com/show/7365/apple-updates-the-imac-haswell-cpus-pcie-ssds-80211ac-wifi i5-4570R = Base model 21" i5-4570 = Base model 27" i5-4670 = Mid range 27" i7-4771 = Top End 27"