first iMac Geekbench score(s)

Discussion in 'iMac' started by slayerizer, Sep 25, 2013.

  1. slayerizer macrumors 6502a

    slayerizer

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2012
    Location:
    Canada
    #1
    seems ligit

    2013 imac 21" - i5 2.7ghz
    score : 9157 LINK

    2012 imac 21" - i5 2.9ghz
    score : 8893 LINK

    I didn't find the others yet.
     
  2. mmomega macrumors demi-god

    mmomega

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2009
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    #2
    the 2012 27" ran a 12,000+ on 32-bit Geekbench.

    I'm interested to see what the new i7 does. I don't think it will be much over 13k 32bit.

    Maybe just break 15k in 64bit
     
  3. slayerizer thread starter macrumors 6502a

    slayerizer

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2012
    Location:
    Canada
    #3
    the ssd is reported to be 1.5x faster.. this could help the 2013 one to feel snappier under heavy load.
     
  4. Takuro macrumors 6502

    Takuro

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2009
    #4
  5. slayerizer thread starter macrumors 6502a

    slayerizer

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2012
    Location:
    Canada
    #5
    that was a fake, it's a hackingtosh score..
     
  6. Mr. Retrofire macrumors 601

    Mr. Retrofire

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2010
    Location:
    www.emiliana.cl/en
    #6
    Nonsense. The SSD has nothing to do with the CPU.
     
  7. fig macrumors 6502a

    fig

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #7
    It would feel snappier with the Fusion drive vs a traditional drive, that just won't affect the Geekbench score at all.
     
  8. Toraen macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    #8
    Also keep in mind that Haswell is not a huge CPU performance increase. It's mainly power consumption + GPU performance.
     
  9. blanka macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2012
    #9
    I really wonder what SSD chips Apple uses.
    For example, if they are Samsung 840 ones, the read speed on PCIE might be like 1.2GB/s and Apple will call it twice as fast, but write will still be around 300MB/S. Does anybody have info on that?
     
  10. n-evo macrumors 65816

    n-evo

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Location:
    Amsterdam
    #10
    Keep in mind they used the 32-bit version of Geekbench. Those results always turn out lower than the 64-bit test.
     
  11. RoryO, Sep 26, 2013
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2013

    RoryO macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2013
    #11

Share This Page