Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Nope. The iPhone SE has the same fingerprint sensor as the iPhone 5s. There have only been two generations of Touch ID. The first-gen in the iPhone 5s and iPhone 6/6 Plus and the second-gen in the iPhone 6s/6s Plus.

This isn't really a bad thing either as some people still think the second-gen of Touch ID is too fast anyway.
The speed of the TouchID on the 5S and the 6 was the same but the reliability was not. The 6/+ sensor was far more reliable than the one on the 5S. I am familiar with both.
 
Well, the pricing here in Belgium blew the iPhone SE out of the water, especially when the iPhone 7 will be released.

€589 for the 64 iPhone SE against €749 for the 64 iPhone 6S, but that will be lowered to €639 at the release of the iPhone 7.
So only €50 difference between the same technology in a different form factor...

While I loved my 5S design (and thus also like the SE), with only a €50 price difference I would choose the 6S.

If Apple would have priced the iPhone SE at €499, it would be more compatative and I would have gone for the iPhone SE.
 
You very well could be correct, but there are so many changes for this product that it could go either way IMO. Nothing Apple does to make a few extra bucks really surprises me anymore.
Seeing as processor R&D, tooling, and manufacturing lines cost hundreds of millions in total investment, I HIGHLY doubt that Apple has done so just to reduce the amount of RAM in the SE. Economies of scale and supply chain management would make it common sense to use the same A9 across the line for the iPhones.

But again, who knows!?:p
 
Thanks YOU! I've been looking for almost a year. 3.99 ain't bad.:)
It's a great game. It's even a universal app now, so you can play it on everything from a 4" iPhone to a large screen connected to the Apple TV 4. Fantastic on the 7ft projection screen in my home theater setup. :D
 
They realized almost immediately after releasing the 6s that it was ridiculously overpriced. Instead of slashing prices, they packed its features on a dinosaur

Yea, like they can do all the R&D and ramp up production in that short amount of time. This has been in the works for at least a year. In fact, they have probably been sitting on it for a while so it wouldn't canabalise 6S sales.
 
  • Like
Reactions: splitpea
Absolutely... just define cheap!
[doublepost=1458655665][/doublepost]
Cheap = fair = market value = ???
But honestly if anyone has a 5s that they no longer need that works on Verizon and is in great shape, send me a message or something.

Can I even do that on here? If not please just delete Mr. Admin. And my apologies for ignorance.
 
The iphone SE is NOT a new iphone! It's a repackaged iphone 5s with slightly upgraded specs and a 16 gigabyte option. More of Tim's regurgitation. Color me disappointed

Ha, yeah, a slightly upgraded model where tests have shown it's slightly faster than the current flagship model. And the iPhone 6s and iPhone 6s Plus come with 16GB, so why were you expecting a "mid-tier" model to come with anything more than 32GB as the baseline model?

I agree that in 2016 it's shocking that 16GB is still an option but Apple have yet to reveal their storage options for their 2016 flagship model, iPhone 7, I'm hoping for 32GB, 128GB and 256GB.
 
That was the least interesting keynote presentation since Steve Jobs yet, I could not bare to watch all of it. I would always watch the keynotes with great anticipation since Steve Jobs announced the iPod. Now things seem to be slowing down at Apple and I'm not sure why, they have so many resources it's insane.

You're looking back with rose colored glasses. There were some *super* boring, mundane keynotes in which Steve Jobs presented. You just remember the best ones.
 
The smaller iPhone is actually surprising good news. Those who longed for the iPhone they were used to got their wish in a BIG way (pun intended). ;)

Is Apple listening to its customers? FINALLY??

Hopefully we'll see more "SE" products other than iPhones (but I highly doubt it).

I'd KILL for an SE 17" MBP. I'd even settle for a 13", like the ancient one they still sell for full price. Or my all-time favorite, a tablelamp iMac. Huminahuminahumina.

Upgrade them with the latest processors/graphics and ports and Apple might keep me for the forseeable future. I'd even be willing to wait for a 3-month build time if they were to decide to go BTO-only.

Still, congrats to you small-phone fans. You have been gifted with something REALLY RARE: Apple giving you what you want.

Tim, if you want to differentiate yourself from Jobs, THIS is the way to do it.
 
I am sorry. They flat out said one (of two) reasons people buy the iPhone 5s was due to size not hardware. They said people want a premium product with modern specs. I got excited and thought that was what they would announce. I should have realized when even Tim Cook was bored, that they were just providing lip service.

Do you have trouble differentiating between what Apple announced and what others had hoped for? Do you really think that its unreasonable for people to want Apple to update a product so that their preferred solution stays modern? You must really despise the MacPro people. This is a forum to discuss Apple, and this particular page is in response to a particular series of products released. Correct? So when other users have a fundamental problem with how products are being treated, they don't want to be told they are ignorant, they want to voice their disappointment in how their opinion is being ignored. I want 3 screen sizes with exactly the same internal hardware. I don't care that you could do more with a larger device. I don't want my choice to be burdened by more than one factor. That's my opinion, not my delusion. Apple used to give us what we wanted before we asked. They made purchasing devices easy, so that buyer remorse was minimal. That time has gone, and now we have to ask (as seen by the prior days announcements) or we will clearly never get it.

The SE is a premium product with modern specs.

And I never called you ignorant. I called you unreasonable. But after reading the bold sentence above, I am having second thoughts. They are never going to squeeze all of the features of a 6s Plus into a 4" 6s even if they wanted to. Not without making some major sacrifices. And that's true for every single product in Apple's catalogue. The old beloved 17" MacBook Pro was a perfect example. It had features that were simply not available on the smaller MBPs -- and it's not because Apple was withholding something, it's because the features physically wouldn't fit.

Now for the practical -- there's no way in the world that Apple is going to introduce a new product, that has better features than their current flagship, not in a phone size that only sold 30 million units last year. They are also not going to release next generation iPhone features 6 months before the 7 series is released, nor would I expect them to invest a single cent more to continue the 6 series design style which also comes to an end in 6 months. Better to put all of their resources into the next generation which has two years in front of it. So rather than reengineer the 6s to fit into a 4" phone, what they did makes a lot of sense. Being frustrated because it's missing a few minor features, not just from the 6s, but the 6s Plus no less, and now saying you want it not just to have parity with the largest iPhone Apple sells, but also the largest most technically advanced iPad Pro Apple sells is extraordinarily unreasonable, nor is it very well thought out. Even the iPhone 7 won't have all of the features of the iPad Pro, if for no other reason than they all won't physically fit within the enclosure.

That's reality.

Whatever you may think Apple used to do, there were always choices a customer had to make. This fantasy of every product having feature parity regardless of the form factor is really unrealistic, and an unreasonable expectation at best. I realize you're disappointed, and understand why. All I'm suggesting is that you look at this reasonably. You're never going to get the phone you want from Apple, and that wouldn't be any different if this were the old Apple or the new -- simply because it's just not yet possible. There are things I don't like about the SE -- I wish it were a few mm thinner. I wish it had 6s design cues, I wish it had more available storage, I wish the FaceTime camera was better. But I don't really care about 3D Touch, or a better display (having had no problems with my 5s), which are about the only other features that aren't comparable to the 6s. Using your logic, no one should buy a new iPhone even a month after its released because technology is improving every day. A person who buys 6 month old technology for the same price it was introduced is getting a bad deal. So the only solution is for Apple to constantly upgrade every aspect of the iPhone every month as new technology becomes available. Which I guess makes sense for someone who is willing to pay whatever the cost, and must have the latest, greatest technology at all times. But that's not practical for any other business or product.

In the end, even though I'm willing to pay $650 for a 4" 6s, Apple is only asking me to pay $400 to accept these compromises. And that's enough to appease my realistic disappointment. Moreover, I'm expecting Apple to come out with a 7SE in a year, which will not only look like the 7, but also have similar feature parity to the 7, and I will expect to pay for it accordingly. Meanwhile, Apple has given me almost the equivalent of the 6s, and is charging me almost half as much, surely knowing that even the current flagship will be outdated in less than 6 months. It's a brilliant business move because it doesn't commit them to a phone that would only have 6 months of maximum profitability, if that, and encourages them to offer a flagship replacement much sooner, while giving them a phone with excellent features to depreciate over the next 3 years.

I don't know about you, but I'm going to go on the Apple monthly payment plan when I buy the SE next week, and in 12 to 18 months when they hopefully introduce a new 4" 7 premium design, I'll upgrade, turning in my SE which will get refurbished and re-sold to someone who will get an amazing entry level phone and an even more bargain basement price than I got it new. And I'll get everything I want within reasonable expectation. And I won't care that a new 4" phone potentially released 6 months after the 7, doesn't have better specs, nor will I be concerned that in another 6 months a brand new phone will come out with better specs. As long as the phone does what I need it to do at that moment, it doesn't matter. If I'm really lucky, they'll release a new 4" 7 in September, and if I'm really unlucky, it'll be 18 months when the 7s comes out. But that's a much better prospect than not having a 4" upgrade at all until then, and having lived without one for the past 18 months. But that's the nature of tech.
 
Last edited:
The A9 is old, the A9X is new. The old processor was used.
The 6s+ camera has better image stabilization.

You're not very nice.
[doublepost=1458658332][/doublepost]

Some people don't care about price. Apple could charge $200 more. I care about function. Yes, I want a 4" screen with iPad pro hardware. 6 months is a long time, especially when Apple designs every aspect the hardware. What I don't want is to have to trade off quality for form. As far as battery life goes, of course it's better. It uses older hardware. 6 moths or 18 months, it's still old.

You have really lost it.
Se has the best iPhone camera(front and back available) , ok no ois that is in an iPhone that is twice as big and twice as expensive.
For the a9x, are you kidding? Apple manages to put in a soc that is faster than the s7 and as fast as 6+ and these are the fastest around.
An a9x with 4gb that is only in the biggest 13 inch iPad ? You should read anandtech' s article. The chip is so big, it wouldn' t even fit in the se.
[doublepost=1458673145][/doublepost]
Thats because the iPad pro is the only device to launch since the A9X was first announced.



"No one needs more than 640k, I mean A9 processing power on their phone."



Because its popular and was released nearly 2 years ago. Why on earth is it still only on the + series. It isn't exactly controlled with hydraulics.


Clearly. Yeah, I mean, who dares to want something more!


(Thanks marketing department.) Of course not exactly the same, but the processor isn't a feature like screen size or battery size. It's completely reasonable to ask for the same level of quality.


Ummm... What?



Yeah. I would. Are you suggesting that better audio is unnecessary or impossible?


What? But they didn't release them at the same time. Now, based on the extra time and economy of scale, they have the ability to improve the design. You know, for that product that wasn't released 6 months ago.


Honestly, I have no idea what you are saying. Are you suggesting that I am upset because they didn't use their newest processor in their newest devices? If so, yeah I am disappointed. Livid is a pretty strong word. I'm not quite that emotionally attached to a product I don't own. Are you emotionally attached to a product you don't own?


I am sorry. They flat out said one (of two) reasons people buy the iPhone 5s was due to size not hardware. They said people want a premium product with modern specs. I got excited and thought that was what they would announce. I should have realized when even Tim Cook was bored, that they were just providing lip service.

Do you have trouble differentiating between what Apple announced and what others had hoped for? Do you really think that its unreasonable for people to want Apple to update a product so that their preferred solution stays modern? You must really despise the MacPro people. This is a forum to discuss Apple, and this particular page is in response to a particular series of products released. Correct? So when other users have a fundamental problem with how products are being treated, they don't want to be told they are ignorant, they want to voice their disappointment in how their opinion is being ignored. I want 3 screen sizes with exactly the same internal hardware. I don't care that you could do more with a larger device. I don't want my choice to be burdened by more than one factor. That's my opinion, not my delusion. Apple used to give us what we wanted before we asked. They made purchasing devices easy, so that buyer remorse was minimal. That time has gone, and now we have to ask (as seen by the prior days announcements) or we will clearly never get it.

You are wrong.
iPad Pro with a9x was announced at the press conference before the iPhone 6s with an a9.
So technically iPad Pro was announced and after that iPhone 6s with a9.
The a9 is their latest cpu :D
 
The smaller iPhone is actually surprising good news. Those who longed for the iPhone they were used to got their wish in a BIG way (pun intended). ;)

Is Apple listening to its customers? FINALLY??

Hopefully we'll see more "SE" products other than iPhones (but I highly doubt it).

I'd KILL for an SE 17" MBP. I'd even settle for a 13", like the ancient one they still sell for full price. Or my all-time favorite, a tablelamp iMac. Huminahuminahumina.

Upgrade them with the latest processors/graphics and ports and Apple might keep me for the forseeable future. I'd even be willing to wait for a 3-month build time if they were to decide to go BTO-only.

Still, congrats to you small-phone fans. You have been gifted with something REALLY RARE: Apple giving you what you want.

Tim, if you want to differentiate yourself from Jobs, THIS is the way to do it.
I am getting good one. I know I've got a 6s Plus but I'm getting one.
 
I'm surprised about all the positivity around the iPhone SE.

Apple have always been the more expensive, more exclusive technology company. The Apple logo seen as a badge of being above the crowd. In recent years, the iPhone has eroded the exclusive part - everyone's Mum, Gran, teacher, five-year-old child etc have iPhones.

But the iPhone SE now brings Apple down to the cheap end of the market. And with that will undoubtedly come a lesser user experience and an increased customer-base of people who just go for the cheap rather than the good.

It would be like Apple bringing out a Mac to compete with Dell's cheap laptops.

It'll be great for profits, but I wonder if Apple's elevated position in consumers' psyche is going to shift. And that's going to be be a very difficult thing to restore.
Cheap end ? Are you serious ? The iPhone SE still cost more than 500€ in Europe....
Cheaper than an iPhone 6S doesn't mean "cheap end" by any means...
[doublepost=1458673853][/doublepost]
Which flagship devices are you refering to? The ones that sell for 749-849€ with less available space than the 2001 iPod and 2011 display technology? What a joke. And what about the macbook air with 2009 low resolution display? And on and on...

"Apple is not about specs" my ass. Tell that to the introducing of the iPod, iPhone and Mac Pro. Expensive, user experience AND top specs. Now it's all about bean counting. Tim Cook is killing Apple. The days of increasing carriers, territories and selling brand are starting to be behind us, and that's all he was doing, selling worse and worse hardware to more and more people.
So sell more hardware to more people means killing Apple. Interesting concept.
I'm glad you are not Apple 's CEO.
[doublepost=1458674249][/doublepost]
My thoughts too....where is 3D Touch?
On another thread you were the one calling 3D Touch as irrelevant (because Samsung hasn't it) and here you are asking where is 3D Touch on the iPhone SE.
Because here it became relevant.
Lol.
[doublepost=1458674408][/doublepost]
The speed of the TouchID on the 5S and the 6 was the same but the reliability was not. The 6/+ sensor was far more reliable than the one on the 5S. I am familiar with both.
I have both (actually the 6 was sold a couple months ago) and I couldn't see any difference in reliability. iPhone 5S TouchID works just fine.
 
I want Rose Gold as well, but everyone says it's too 'girly'. I don't like labels like that. What are your thoughts?
I've seen young men with the rose gold and they rocked it. If you're on the shy side, it may not be a good idea. If you're more willing to push the envelope, why not?
Personally I wouldn't be bothered if a man of mine carried one.
 
Well, the pricing here in Belgium blew the iPhone SE out of the water, especially when the iPhone 7 will be released.

€589 for the 64 iPhone SE against €749 for the 64 iPhone 6S, but that will be lowered to €639 at the release of the iPhone 7.
So only €50 difference between the same technology in a different form factor...

While I loved my 5S design (and thus also like the SE), with only a €50 price difference I would choose the 6S.

If Apple would have priced the iPhone SE at €499, it would be more compatative and I would have gone for the iPhone SE.
False.
The 64 Gb iPhone 6S in Belgium costs 859€.
The 16 Gb is 749€.
 
I was stunned that 95% of the presentation was leaked way beforehand. Usually stuff leaks and we have ideas but Apple usually has some surprises or "one last thing". The True Tone color thing for ipad is neat, and I expect that to possibly come to iphone 7. The first half of the presentation was boring . Blah , Green Tech, Blah, Environment, Blah Blah Recycling. I recycle and try to be green but damn that part of the presentation dragged on . Apple and Nintendo should have presented MiiTomo iphone game/app to the west for the ' one last thing' considering that Nintendo just released the app last week in Japan. Missed opportunities by both Nintendo and Apple to make this presentation really shine
 
Why can't people understand the se isn't about features surpassing the 6s/+? It's about offering a smaller phone for those who want it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kerrikins



Apple today provided members of the press with hands-on time using the iPhone SE and 9.7" iPad Pro, and first impressions of the new products are beginning to surface across the web. Below is a roundup of some of the more interesting observations and opinions about the new smartphone and tablet.

iPhone SE

iPhone-SE-demo-800x273.jpg

The Verge said the iPhone SE "finally makes a small phone feel powerful," which is unsurprising given it is essentially an iPhone 6s shrunk down into an iPhone 5s form factor. The 4-inch smartphone is powered by a 64-bit A9 chip with M9 motion co-processor, which is up to twice as fast as the iPhone 5s. Other features are outlined in our iPhone SE announcement coverage.

TechnoBuffalo described the iPhone SE's top five new features as its 4-inch screen size, $399 starting price, 4K video recording, Live Photos support, and full Apple Pay support without needing an Apple Watch.

Business Insider highlighted how Apple used more scratch resistant materials for the iPhone SE shell, meaning it should not be prone to scratches and scuffs as easily as the iPhone 5s. This includes matte-chamfered edges and a slightly different aluminum backing with a color-matching Apple logo.More: Ars Technica, Engadget, TechRadar, and SlashGear

Click here to read rest of article...

Article Link: First Impressions Roundup: iPhone SE and 9.7" iPad Pro
[doublepost=1458681282][/doublepost]I so hope that the iPhone releases in the Fall come earlier than before, maintain the large size and come in pure white color . I did not think I would like an all white phone, but it really stands out and is quite beautiful.
 
I'm a big fan of the 4" phone size so very happy Apple has released a well-priced model with decent specs.

From the perspective of a corporate drone, however, it's unfortunate that a 16gb base model was released. My company pays for my phone and plan, but will only supply the base iPhone model (16gb is more than enough to fulfill business needs, i.e. e-mail). I imagine many other people in similar positions to my own will be forced to endure a company supplied 16gb model #firstworldproblems
 
They realized almost immediately after releasing the 6s that it was ridiculously overpriced. Instead of slashing prices, they packed its features on a dinosaur

Unreal.

Heads should be rolling.

Some of these comments are baffling. I can only assume that people talking like this actively begrudge others the choice of a smaller phone, because otherwise I can't make any sense of the attitude.

False.
The 64 Gb iPhone 6S in Belgium costs 859€.
The 16 Gb is 749€.

I was going to say, there's a $300 difference in price in Canada, I'd be surprised if things were that different elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.