I think it is important to be in a school setting. I think children learn great social skills in school and if you stick them in a room with an iPad all day, how can they relate to the outside world?
I posted on here the last time this topic came up, but my son is accepted to one of the Steve Jobs schools. While I hate the name and thought it was only a nickname, this is a very interesting concept.
First of all there are teachers, and there are classrooms with other students. There are also many opportunities for the kids to experiment with art, sports, science, math, etc. without an iPad. The iPads are one of the main tools used at the schools, however they are not the only tool.
The ability to keep a very close eye on students progress (parents and teachers) is a huge benefit in my opinion.
This is not a home school program, kids go to school regularly but with more flexibility which as a parent is a very nice option.
I do not understand why you need to hold a physical book to get a true learning experience, that just does not make any sense to me and sounds a bit old fashion.
We have not make our final decision if my son will go here, however it is very interesting and I think it could be great for him.
And the majority of that is taught in hallways, lunchrooms and playgrounds. Not in the classroom.
Maybe things are different in the Netherlands, but here in the US, I don't think kids studying themselves to sleep is a widespread problem.Backlit displays are more tiring for your eyes than paper or e-ink displays, and research has shown that prolonged exposure to bright backlit displays (before going to bed) can cause sleeping problems.
I think there is no scientific reason why there should be any difference between paper and iPad books for eyes.
Thats not what what iPad based learning is. Perhaps you should do a bit more background reading on the notion.
Oh and in many paper based classrooms the kids aren't social either. They are sitting their desks listening to a teacher or reading from their paper based books. So don't paint this as a unique issue for using iPads etc
Then get rid of Mac Rumors (online forums), Facebook, Twitter, XBOX, Playstation, Online Gaming and most of all Text Messaging after school hours because it's already happening in terms of our youth not relating to the outside world. Schools are at the tail end of the totem pole jumping on the bandwagon, it's not going to make or break the way things are now.
You probably don't use books a lot. Not only is it not good for your eyes, but online reading makes it very hard to go forward and backwards over a large number of pages. it might work reading a novell, but for eductional books in which childeren are intended to find their information during studying instantly, it will suck. Especially if you have more than one book to look into.
Much of it is, I agree. But the tech in education field is directly linked to less of that too.
They definitely are coming...this is the future. But kids will hate them, they'll mean more standardized testing, kids will act out more, they'll be a larger and larger licensing fee each year, etc.
I think there is no scientific reason why there should be any difference between paper and iPad books for eyes
I'm all for using tech where appropriate to aid the learning process, but a Steve Jobs school? Really? Is it just me or is this idea really tacky?
Perhaps you can play hero here and explain it then. Referencing an earlier article this was said, "There will be no blackboards, chalk or classrooms, homeroom teachers, formal classes, lesson plans, seating charts, pens, teachers teaching from the front of the room, schedules, parent-teacher meetings, grades, recess bells, fixed school days and school vacations. If a child would rather play on his or her iPad instead of learning, it'll be okay. And the children will choose what they wish to learn based on what they happen to be curious about."
I'm all for using tech where appropriate to aid the learning process, but a Steve Jobs school? Really? Is it just me or is this idea really tacky?
I've seen a 4 year old girl using an iPad without any problems.
As a fellow Dutchman, please don't!
It depends, I suppose. I don't know how parents run things these days but I think social interaction is very important. I've seen the disadvantages first hand and quite recently.
Or it isn't. You are making leaps based on scant information including a lack of actual experience with all schools using such materials.
Or they won't and again you are basing this in no real information. Not to mention making huge leaps that are totally not connected. iPads will make kids act out more. Kids act out because they haven't been taught by their parents how to properly behave, are in classrooms where the teachers don't pay attention etc (both if which have been happening for years before even computers)
As for your testing comments, we might not need standardized testing at this point because of being able to test kids as they move along. Which might be good given that the linking of federal funds and those tests can lead to this, this, and this
You know, I get emails all the time trying to sell me iPad keyboards for about £20. Keyboard is much better for typing. And I'm really curious what makes the iPad "quite limited for education" without a stylus, when 99.9% of all customers don't use one.
That is one programs definition. Not the entire form. Despite you and several other folks lacking the ability to tell the difference and bashing the whole notion off that slip.
iPads are a tool, just like all other tools. Use the tools well and get good results. Use them poorly and get poor results. Same as decades of book based teaching which hasn't saved the world