so...for only $100 more you can get the Apple Watch
Apple Watch only has one day battery life.
FitBit's have up to 5 days.
so...for only $100 more you can get the Apple Watch
Apple Watch only has one day battery life.
FitBit's have up to 5 days.
With no FitBit integration, all other fitness devices are a big fail for FitBit users. What silly people they are.With no Apple Health integration, all this is kind of a fail for iOS users. What silly people they are.
Actually, it is being pulled from Apple stores due to lack of support for HealthKit.
Except no one's actually VERIFIED the battery life on the device yet.
Would I be surprised if the battery only lasted a day? Sure.
Would I be surprised if they managed to squeeze more battery life out of it? No.
Will I jump to conclusions about a device I don't have much information on? Hell no. I'm just pointing out that based on what fitbit has released on the Surge, for not much more you can get a fully functional device that is going to give you more than your heart rate and a step count.
Why would anyone with an iOS device want a fitness tracker when it's intentionally not to be integrated with healthkit?
Though we know much more details about the FitBit products than about the Apple Watch.But I suppose since they are both un-released all of this is speculation on my part.
Maybe you're just sleepwalking.how accurate are the step counts? i have a fitbit one, and i use it for sleep tracking. when i get up in the morning it says that i have walked ~100 steps or so. is this just a limitation of the fitbit one?
Apple Watch only has one day battery life.
FitBit's have up to 5 days.
Except no one's actually VERIFIED the battery life on the device yet.
Would I be surprised if the battery only lasted a day? Sure.
Would I be surprised if they managed to squeeze more battery life out of it? No.
Will I jump to conclusions about a device I don't have much information on?
From what I can see, the Apple Watch is an amazing feat of technology and as is typical with Apple is beautifully designed.
However, I'm not sure I want to be out in public somewhere with my MBP open, while I am talking on my iPhone, with my iPad nearby, while looking at my Apple Watch to see what time it is.
I would like an activity tracker that is as minimal as possible, that doesn't look like a watch and integrates with HealthKit.
so...for only $100 more you can get the Apple Watch
To bad they refuse to integrate with Health Kit. I would love the HR. I don't need a watch but I would just like to track heartbeat. But if it means having it isolated in the app, it's not worth it.
I've been using various Fitbit products for a while, and had the opportunity Misfit Shine to try for the next week or so. The Shine exports steps to HealthKit, which I thought would be kind of interesting to try out. So I've only been using the Shine for about a day now, but I'm not getting why everyone is making such a big deal out of HealthKit so far. Maybe I'm missing something, but from a data presentation and recording perspective it doesn't seem to be all that great. Not being able to see a graph of what time I was active yesterday is kind of annoying.
I'm not feeling like I've been missing out on a lot by not having HealthKit integration so far. Is there something else to HealthKit that I'm not seeing? I was pretty content to stay within the Fitbit app prior to the release of iOS 8, and I haven't seen anything that's made me change my mind so far.
Look at the Vivosmart or forthcoming Mio devices, Fuse and Velo ( include HR monitor - same tech. as Link ) - they are focused to health and connect to Ant+ devices for speed sensors etc.
The vivosmart will sync with Health.app - limited integration so far.