Can anyone comment on the accuracy of the heart rate monitoring for Fitbit devices? I have heard some reviews that they are not comparable to the accuracy of Jawbone's.
a shame FitBit is so greedy w/ my data....no HealthKit support, no buy.
im aware of hacks to work-around the problem, but thats not for me or my family members id need to support. i want turn-key and i want it natively.
i sent my family to the Jawbone device line.
Fistly, it makes comparing steps, weight, and diet far easier. Second, the utter arrogance of FitBit in dealing with its customers, all you got back from them was PR spin, just turned me right off.can i ask what's the big deal not having healthkit integration? i have the charge HR, link it to my fitness pal, and have all my data right where i need it. at no point do i think im missing out by not being able to sync to the HEALTH app.
it can't even display kilojoules!Fitbit's app is currently far superior to Healthkit.
Additionally, any fitness buff would have to ask themselves, why buy the Surge, if for 100 bucks more you could have theWatch with it's ecosystem and no doubt zillions of Apps that are sure to follow.
Waiting for iOS8 integration
The Surge seems pretty competitive with, say the Garmin FR220, which is also $250 but w/o HR. You have to get the HR bundle on that watch for an extra $50 to get the true running data features.
The Surge's problem is that the $250 space is becoming crowded with lots of great choices. Fitbit isn't king of the higher end activity monitor space as it was with the low end.
I have the Charge HR. It's a good activity monitor for $150, basically a Force with HR and Caller ID. Much better than the Nike Fuel Band, which is still available for sale at $150, but basically abandonware.
Mine has been dead on when I'm using the HR monitor on my gym's elliptical machine. I've heard that the Surge has been losing connectivity when your HR goes above 170 though. I have yet to see this, but I don't usually take my heart rate up that high either. I use the Surge.
I saw a video on youtube comparing the Surge and the Charge HR and the Surge is more accurate in real time but the Charge HR catches up and the average is the same in the end. Not sure if that matters to you.
I went with the Surge over the Charge HR cause A. Charge HR sold out at Best Buy first and B. I like new tech and didn't want to wear both a Pebble and a Fitbit Charge HR at the same time, which I would have to do to get the functionality of the Surge and I'd still lose out on activity logging from the watch (which is a lot more useful than you'd think) and GPS. Also I know I'm in the minority here but I think the Surge is a decent looking watch, at very least compared to my Pebble.
----------
.
For those who use the Surge, if you keep it on while sleeping, can you comment on how comfortable it is? Was there an adjustment period in this regard? Other than to charge, do you ever take it off?
How exactly are you judging or compparing the HR accuracey? Running a seperate HR stap at the same time maybe?
Most optical HR units are horrible with anything other than resting HR. Numerous reviews of numerous devices over the past two years show this.
The watch strap is fairly flexible rubber material and I find it to be very comfortable. Fitbit recommends you wear it a little looser throughout the day and then you can tighten it a notch or so when performing strenuous exercise. As far as sleeping goes I hardly notice it. I guess I am used to sleeping with watches on and the strap / face isn't much larger than a full sized men's athletic watch. Though it is listed as water resistant I take it off to shower and try to remember to take it off while doing dishes (though I sometime forget). Haven't had any issues when it has gotten wet.
Still not waterproof and thus no support for us swimmers. Biking and running and elliptical aren't the only forms of exercise. And since many experts say swimming is one of the best forms of I'm shocked that after all this time it's still not waterproof.