Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,194
30,136


It's been over 200 days since Apple debuted its redesigned MacBook Pro lineup. Offered in 14-inch and 16-inch display sizes, the new-look MacBooks wowed Apple fans and creative pros alike with their powerful custom Apple silicon, mini-LED screen, and multiple connectivity options. But there are still some things you can't do with a MacBook Pro. Here are five features some Mac users are still waiting for.

14-16-inch-2021-mbps-back-to-back-feature-orange.jpg

1. Support for 120Hz 4K Displays

Five years after it removed the HDMI port on the MacBook Pro, Apple in 2021 brought back the much-used multimedia interface to its top-of-the-line notebook. Unfortunately, the HDMI port that returned isn't so top-of-the-line – it's an HDMI 2.0 port instead of an HDMI 2.1 port.

macbook-pro-ports-hdmi-sd.jpg

HDMI 2.1 technology would have allowed the port to run a 4K display with a 120Hz refresh rate. As it stands, the HDMI 2.0 port on the current MacBook Pro supports only a 4K display with a refresh rate of up to 60Hz.

Apple's decision not to support 4K at 120Hz may well have been based on bandwidth limitations, but connecting Thunderbolt/USB-C displays results in a similar maximum refresh rate. According to Apple, the M1 Pro MacBook Pro models support up to two external displays with up to 6K resolution at 60Hz, while the M1 Max MacBook Pro models support up to three external displays with up to 6K resolution and one external display with up to 4K resolution at 60Hz.

2. Support for UHS-III SD Cards

In its bid to placate photographers and video producers, Apple reintroduced the SD card slot, not seen in a MacBook Pro model since 2015. What it didn't explicitly advertise is that the slot doesn't support UHS-III cards, which offer read and write speeds up to 624 MB/s. (That wasn't the only disappointment: The SD card slot on the new MacBook Pros supports UHS-II cards, but only up to 250MB/s of data transfer, not the 312MB/s speeds that the standard is theoretically capable of.)

2021-MBP-SD-Card-Error-Feature.jpg

There may not be many UHS-III cameras out there yet, but future-proofing the connectivity on a notebook that costs upwards of $2,000 is always going to be a welcome measure.

3. Ethernet Port

There's a simple enough reason why Apple didn't add Ethernet connectivity to its latest MacBook Pro: A standard Ethernet port is actually thicker than the notebook's chassis. So why should this even be considered a glaring omission?

imac-ethernet-port.png

In fact, Apple faced the same challenge with the thin design of the latest 24-inch iMac, which unlike the MacBook Pro has traditionally included an Ethernet port. Apple's solution was to place the Ethernet port in the power adapter. Apple says this "cool new innovation" allows users to keep their desks less cluttered, while still enjoying the benefits of Ethernet, which makes the lack of a similar port on the MacBook Pro power brick all the more surprising.

4. 5G Network Connectivity

Lenovo, Samsung, Acer, Dell, and HP all offer laptops with 5G connectivity, yet no Mac in Apple's notebook lineup currently supports the cellular standard. The same can't be said for Apple's iPad range, with LTE versions of both the iPad Pro and iPad mini readily available.

Apple-5G-Modem-Feature-Triad.jpg

Should we expect the situation to change anytime soon? Perhaps so, if a report from January 2021 by well-connected Bloomberg journalist Mark Gurman is anything to go by. Apple has developed "underlying Mac support" for cellular connectivity, according to Gurman, and given that we know Apple is working on its own custom modem set to appear in iPhones as soon as 2023, here's hoping that it makes an appearance in next year's MacBook Pro.

5. Wi-Fi 6E Support

Some say Wi-Fi 6E is still too new for it to be worth Apple's support yet. The counterargument is that the Google Pixel 6 and Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra already comply with the standard, and users typically upgrade their smartphone far more frequently than their notebook.

linksys-wifi-6e.jpg

Wi-Fi 6E offers the features and capabilities of Wi-Fi 6, including higher performance, lower latency, and faster data rates, extended into the 6 GHz band. The additional spectrum provides more airspace beyond existing 2.4GHz and 5GHz Wi-Fi, resulting in increased bandwidth and less interference for devices that support Wi-Fi 6E.

Since early 2021 – months before the new MacBook Pro was launched – half a dozen routers and mesh systems have included the latest Wi-Fi 6E band. There will be more as time goes by. All of these reasons speak to why Apple is expected to support the standard in its first mixed reality headset, which is expected later this year or next. That it could feature in the next-generation of MacBook Pro is by no means outside the realms of possibility.

Article Link: Five Things You Still Can't Do With a MacBook Pro
 
Last edited:

lars666

macrumors 65816
Jul 13, 2008
1,188
1,270
4K 120Hz on the new MacBook Pro is supported through the Thunderbolt 4 port though, isn't it? (Sorry if I misunderstand something in the article here, no native speaker - sounds to me as if it claims that this also isn't possible)
 

-griffy-

macrumors member
Jun 15, 2011
49
108
Point 1 makes it sound like you can't get 4K at 120 at all, but you absolutely can over DisplayPort/Thunderbolt (even past 120hz). Just not over HDMI.

EDIT: The article cites the technical specs for the M1 Pro and M1 Max, which only states 60hz, but that's a bit misleading because it is saying the M1 Max supports, all at the same time, running the built-in display at full resolution, three 6K displays, and one 4K display, at 60hz. As in you have the internal display AND four monitors running at 4K or above all plugged in at the same time, it can handle that at 60hz.

If you aren't using all that bandwidth at the same time it is more than capable of handling two 4K displays at 144hz over DisplayPort/Thunderbolt.
 
Last edited:

frostbit3

macrumors regular
Jun 20, 2010
129
60
I would love to be able to push my G9 at 240hz with native res. Still can't do it to this day, and sometimes have weird flickering issues with it. I have to do 5120x1440 120hz via M1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VideoFreek

Sensamic

macrumors 68030
Mar 26, 2010
2,987
591
So a Mac Mini isn’t compatible with a 120hz monitor either?

No Mac laptop either?

I was thinking of buying a Mini + 165hz external monitor.
 

rorydaredking

macrumors member
Aug 3, 2014
70
58
Point 4 is redundant due to the seamless personal hotspot functionality. Apple experimented with modems as evidenced by that prototype MacBook Pro years ago, why would they suddenly add more wireless kit that needs antennas, shielding, standards, chips etc- when their software integration solution works so well.
 

Michael Scrip

macrumors 604
Mar 4, 2011
7,922
12,470
NC
Support for UHS-III SD Cards

Hmmm... the UHS-III spec was proposed in 2017... but I don't think any UHS-III cards have actually come to market.

And neither have the cameras that would use them.

It seems that camera manufacturers have gone in a different direction... towards CFast, CFexpress, and other card types.

So is this really a knock against Apple?

🤔
 

djdj

macrumors regular
Jul 14, 2008
104
138
They could include Ethernet in the chassis if they wanted to. I've had a couple different laptops that have Ethernet ports even though the chassis is thinner than the connector -- it's done with a drop-down door to hold on to the bottom of the connector while the connecting pins are permanently fixed in place.
 

Kastellen

macrumors regular
Apr 25, 2014
119
108
So let's see...

120hz 4k display, that'd be nice if I owned one:)
SD Card? Nope, waste of a port to begin with
Ethernet? use a dongle.
5G? why would I want that built in, use a hotspot
6e? Nice if it was there, but unless you're in a congested area, doesn't have much impact
Yep. Number of the mentioned things that move the needle for me? Zero.
 

djdj

macrumors regular
Jul 14, 2008
104
138
no VGA out either, or how about some other legacy ports? Seriously? I have a few external HDDs, bought 2 usb-c to that stupid flat connector cables for $6. Much better than adding an obsolete port. I have a 13 MBP M1, also bought a usbC to HDMI cable, why do people fall in love with their old cables, seriously?
USB-A is still very necessary. Dongles add complexity, cost, and tend to be unreliable. Just this morning I was fighting a laptop that only has USB-C and needed to plug in a USB-A-only device. But any time we'd touch the cable it would disconnect. Had to tape it all together to make it reliable. Very frustrating.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.