Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
that doesn't make sense

your argument: "someone thinks touchscreens feels very natural, therefore no going back"

but someone thinks physical keyboards on phones feel very natural, but it's been one upped by removing it.
Not "someone thinks", but this generation thinks.
 
I can imagine Tim Cook saying something to Apple's industrial designers similar to this: "Even if that laptop doesn't have Face ID, make sure it still has a notch. The iPhones are Apple's biggest money-maker, and they have a notch. Therefore, I think we can make more money by selling more laptops if they also have a notch."
Omg this is actually what Cook said, it’s in the court files 😅😅
 
Unless Apple has really given up on their usability testing and sending ideas back to their teams to refine and rethink before a final one going to production? I can't see this ever seeing the light of day in the proposed form shown here.

A foldable screen on a laptop? There are ways that could be amazing, but not anything like this!

What I could see working is a laptop that you open up and it has a standard keyboard/trackpad arrangement, but the display portion is made of 3 panels. So you'd lift the lid and then unfold the screen to your left and to your right to have the equivalent of 3 screens to use.
Remember when people were putting Magic Keyboards on their 2015-19 MacBooks because the keyboards were failing (I was among them)?
This is that all over again, just with a touchscreen…
Or maybe just maybe Apple come out with a 999 dollar case with a keyboard attachment…
 
This has to be a joke. Surely?!?!

It's not. There's been so many patents for such a device from Apple going back well over a decade. But to make it work there surely has to be a fusion of macOS & iPadOS operating systems....

Unfortunately the bean counters run Apple and want people to buy an iPad and a MacBook, rather than 1 device that can do it all. Perhaps they might finally listen to all the strong criticism of iPadOS and realise that there is a lucrative market for a fully touchscreen MacBook. And I'm sure the bean counters will be very excited when they realise it will cost a lot less to produce than a MacBook as they'll be no physical keys and moving parts at all. Literally just a slab of foldable glass with essentially the same innards as a iPad Pro/MacBook Air.
 
It's not. There's been so many patents for such a device from Apple going back well over a decade. But to make it work there surely has to be a fusion of macOS & iPadOS operating systems....

Unfortunately the bean counters run Apple and want people to buy an iPad and a MacBook, rather than 1 device that can do it all. Perhaps they might finally listen to all the strong criticism of iPadOS and realise that there is a lucrative market for a fully touchscreen MacBook. And I'm sure the bean counters will be very excited when they realise it will cost a lot less to produce than a MacBook as they'll be no physical keys and moving parts at all. Literally just a slab of foldable glass with essentially the same innards as a iPad Pro/MacBook Air.
Bean counters are not running Apple. Every product goes through development that includes decision making on available technologies, new technologies, user experience, new benefits to user, fit within a category, creating a new category, production capability and hundreds of other points…including proposed cost and margin. To suggest that a “bean counter” at Apple is driving, let alone having a major impact on, new product development suggests you’ve really have zero idea of how product development happens at Apple or just about any company.

I’d also challenge this notion that there is a lucrative and untapped market for a touchscreen Mac/iPad converged product. Where are you getting your data from? I could just as easily argue that it’s far more likely that MacOS and the various Mac devices will become even more like iOS, including eliminating even more of the legacy computer operating things that some equate with being a “real” computer.
 
Not "someone thinks", but this generation thinks.
and?

the point still applies, you're not making sense.

and originally you said your wife, now it's "most people" and/or " this generation". constantly changing your story.

explain "no going back" when apple stopped shipping iPad keyboards without trackpad for many generations and now is shipping iPad keyboards with trackpads. they literally went back lol
 
You do realise this isn’t a real product don’t you?

Name one thing a pro photographer or videographer cannot do on the MacBook Pro, that they could only do on a more beefed up machine.

Apple cannot care that people get so emotional about individual wants. Why would they when it’s out of their control? If people are going to make individual demands like you have (without even using a specific request other than 'more pro') you’ll end up getting a Homer Simpson car.

What does your version of More Pro even mean?

Oh to name a couple how about more RAM?

How about a processor that doesn’t get beaten in many workflows by next gen’s Max variant. Which is what I’m facing now between my M3 Max MacBook Pro and my M2 Ultra. M3 Max is better in a lot of ways and it’s ridiculous.
 
Bean counters are not running Apple. Every product goes through development that includes decision making on available technologies, new technologies, user experience, new benefits to user, fit within a category, creating a new category, production capability and hundreds of other points…including proposed cost and margin. To suggest that a “bean counter” at Apple is driving, let alone having a major impact on, new product development suggests you’ve really have zero idea of how product development happens at Apple or just about any company.

I’d also challenge this notion that there is a lucrative and untapped market for a touchscreen Mac/iPad converged product. Where are you getting your data from? I could just as easily argue that it’s far more likely that MacOS and the various Mac devices will become even more like iOS, including eliminating even more of the legacy computer operating things that some equate with being a “real” computer.

Apple exists to make money. The iPad Pro is the result of bean counters dictating what it can do. The hardware engineers really show off the very best of what Apple can do with mobile focussed computing as the iPad Pro has always been cutting edge and technically brilliant, with this years model taking it to new levels of excellence. Then their souls get crushed when it's forced to run iPadOS which is purposely limited by software decisions so it does not trample on the MacBook market. Everyone can see this! It's not even up for debate.

The bean counters want the iPad Pro to be nothing more than a companion device. It's been this way since the iPad Pro launched and it's done on purpose, with very small 'concessions' made in an attempt to market it as "Pro" now and then with new 'features' that usually disappoint, but of course it still massively misses the mark on an annual basis.

I don't know, maybe the iPad Pro will get a massively reworked iPadOS that it truly deserves this year, but how long have we been crossing our fingers? Since 2016. And only another week to wait for our annual disappointment. Hooray!
 
Oh to name a couple how about more RAM?

How about a processor that doesn’t get beaten in many workflows by next gen’s Max variant. Which is what I’m facing now between my M3 Max MacBook Pro and my M2 Ultra. M3 Max is better in a lot of ways and it’s ridiculous.
Do you mean upgradability? I can get behind that, but the rest of what you’re saying I don’t think applies to the vast majority of people, pro or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wbeasley
If you're tired of speculating about foldables, feast your eyes on this, and tell us what it's about!


Poor man's Apple vision, that allows you a kinda sorta partial interaction with virtual visual objects?
Way to let people around you see the ghosts of what you are seeing on your vision pro?
Way to tap into the oh-so-lucrative projective display market pioneered by Humane?


BTW there are also a surprisingly large number of Apple patents surrounding various aspects of "smart fabrics". I suspect that's another area where at some point (and who knows when? five years from now?) Apple will ship something we did not expect. Maybe a smart glove? A health-data-collecting undershirt?
 
It's not. There's been so many patents for such a device from Apple going back well over a decade. But to make it work there surely has to be a fusion of macOS & iPadOS operating systems....

Unfortunately the bean counters run Apple and want people to buy an iPad and a MacBook, rather than 1 device that can do it all. Perhaps they might finally listen to all the strong criticism of iPadOS and realise that there is a lucrative market for a fully touchscreen MacBook. And I'm sure the bean counters will be very excited when they realise it will cost a lot less to produce than a MacBook as they'll be no physical keys and moving parts at all. Literally just a slab of foldable glass with essentially the same innards as a iPad Pro/MacBook Air.
The thing that makes it a silly idea, something that even if brought to market, it would fail, is the existence of a $400 iPad Pro keyboard.

If touch was so pro, why would physical keyboards be such a popular product?
 
The thing that makes it a silly idea, something that even if brought to market, it would fail, is the existence of a $400 iPad Pro keyboard.

If touch was so pro, why would physical keyboards be such a popular product?
Well the iPad only has 1 screen so a physical keyboard is all that can be offered.

I just think it's a device Apple will bring to market at some point especially as iPad sales wane. There's far too many patents for such a device for them not to bring it to market, so there's clearly been at least a decades worth of R&D into such a product if you follow the patent trail. There's even patents for an iMac like device with a built in touch screen keyboard, so it suggests Apple have really been exploring this idea for a while internally. Link below shows the patents with the physical keyboard, but there's also a variation with an all glass/screen version where the physical keyboard is.

 
Last edited:
Interesting view. Have you never touched the screen of the iPad when it is on your Magic Keyboard?

I do that everyday and it is intuitive to me. Touching a vertical screen just works for many scenarios.
100% These images say that I find the 12.9 IPP useable in non horizontal mode 😀


Whether I am sitting at a desk, cross legged on the floor or semi-reckining while I’m doing haemodialysis, I find using an iPad in non horizontal mode intuitive, like you. Actually, they call out to me to use the pencil, so…..

Tom
 
  • Like
Reactions: W£S
I'm sure Apple is cooking up some kind of foldable and working on Mac OS with touch in the lab. But if we see this thing in the next year or so I'll know Apple has jumped the shark
 
So for the product to actually be useful you have to buy an external keyboard.
For the Mac Mini to be actually useful you need to buy a mouse, keyboard, and display. But if you dont want to spend $30 on a USB-C keyboard for this MacTablet Fold, just use the onscreen one.
For the sidecar thing, I haven’t bothered much tampering with it because my setup is dual monitor. I just tried it once out of curiosity. Are you sure the restriction is app based, rather than window based?
I can’t stretch any single app window across both displays; seems to be a Sidecar limitation.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.