Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
most of the these so called leaks etc are all intentional click baits done in coordination with apple (off course they cover their tracks) to hype up apple and iphone...its a known thing they do paying bloggers and websites through middle men (so not connected to them) as if there is really leaks when in fact they are the ones spreading those leaks...
 
most of the these so called leaks etc are all intentional click baits done in coordination with apple (off course they cover their tracks) to hype up apple and iphone...its a known thing they do paying bloggers and websites through middle men (so not connected to them) as if there is really leaks when in fact they are the ones spreading those leaks...
Typically with Forbes something like that doesn't really appear to be the case given most of their Apple "articles".
 
The Problem with Forbes, isn’t necessarily that I think they’re a ‘bad source’, they regurgitate the same information a day later from other sources have already reported their findings on the iPhone 12. I know they don’t have a ‘strong rep’ for credibility, but they’ve been caught in the past for plagiarizing, which, you can’t reverse the damage control for something like that.
 
Forbes is nothing but clickbait. They steal from others sources and tend to over sensationalize things to get viewers.
They don't vet their info since it comes from information that has already been announced.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.