Average Pro

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 16, 2013
421
176
Cali
Who ever gets their hands on one of these, please confirm it works with the Mac Pro.

http://diglloyd.com/blog/2014/20141030_0720-NEC-PA322UHD.html

NEC PA322UHD 32-Inch Professional UltraHD 4K Display Now Can be Ordered

THURSDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2014 - SEND FEEDBACK
Search: 4K display
See NEC to Offer 32-Inch Professional UltraHD 4K Display Soon (PA322UHD) for more information and my comments on this exciting new offering for professionals. Thanks for using these links to order.

Order NEC PA322UHD with calibration software and calibrator unit
(slightly confusing click the “Price” button to add to cart)

Order NEC PA322UHD WITHOUT software/hardware calibration (not recommended)

The PA322 UHD is due to ship in December, but I hope to have a unit for review in November. A 32-inch display has a viewable image size of 31.5 inches diagonally.

I’m feeling strongly inclined to return the iMac 5K for two reasons. First, the PA322UHD will suit my needs much better over time, even though it is “only” a 4K UltraHD display. Second the iMac 5K is woefully expensive once configured up, has a number of limitations, and the 5K screen while gorgeous for viewing has a very high pixel density which is not looking all that friendly for tweaking images at a detail level.
 

deconstruct60

macrumors G3
Mar 10, 2009
9,795
2,162
Who ever gets their hands on one of these, please confirm it works with the Mac Pro.

Probably since
"... The screen is based on a Sharp IGZO IPS-type panel like several other 31.5" displays currently available (Dell UP3214Q for instance) which offers IPS-like performance characteristics. ... "


http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/news_archive/31.htm#nec_pa322uhd

Basically same panel with NEC expanded color and backlight additions. Probably still same DisplayPort 1.2 MST connection from Mac Pro , but possible a slightly better panel controller.

Priced in same ballpark as 5K iMac. If internal color lookup table (LUT) , 10-bit color, and wider gamut backlighting are far more important than just raw number of pixels then it is probably a reasonable trade-off.


At the more affordable entry point it more interesting if this one
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/news_archive/31.htm#nec_ea244uhd
 
Last edited:
Comment

flowrider

macrumors 604
Nov 23, 2012
6,691
2,599
I wish the industry would move to or have options for a 16:10 aspect ratio rather than the 16:9.

Lou
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redneck1089
Comment

mintakax

macrumors regular
Dec 19, 2013
174
10
No has this one yet on their nMP ?
I'm seriously considering one. I already have the spectraview stuff.
I wish it were 1/2 the price :eek:
 
Comment

Average Pro

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 16, 2013
421
176
Cali
40" - Sweet

Thanks for the link - lots of great info. I instantly fell in love with that 40". I'm perplexed why apple never re-made a 30". I'm not willing to accept anything smaller.
 
Comment

Average Pro

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 16, 2013
421
176
Cali
Available Now?

I recently noticed that B&H indicates the monitor will be available on 01 DEC 2014. However, there is no mention of 4K on this or NEC's website.

The article title clearly states it will be a 4k monitor, but even within the article, the only mention of 4k applies to the 24" monitor.

Thoughts?
 
Comment

ekwipt

macrumors 6502a
Jan 14, 2008
911
304
I wish the iMac was able to be run as a sundry monitor for the MacPro, so much more bang for your buck!
 
Comment

flowrider

macrumors 604
Nov 23, 2012
6,691
2,599
^^^^Because I have a 24" 16:10 now, and the real estate at the bottom is important to me.

Lou
 
Comment

ToroidalZeus

macrumors 68020
Dec 8, 2009
2,300
871
^^^^Because I have a 24" 16:10 now, and the real estate at the bottom is important to me.

Lou

I can see that. Last week I moved my dock to the left of the screen so I could add an extra inch of bottom real estate. I feel that with a 32" 4K display 16:9 won't be that much of an issue because of simply how large the screen is.
 
Comment

fuchsdh

macrumors 68000
Jun 19, 2014
1,723
1,093
I wish the industry would move to or have options for a 16:10 aspect ratio rather than the 16:9.

Lou

Not likely to happen, at this point. The industry has moved to 16:9 by and large, I don't think they're going to pivot back.
 
Comment

Average Pro

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 16, 2013
421
176
Cali
Got 32?

The PA322UHD 32-Inch Professional UltraHD 4K display is here and attached to my 2013 Mac Pro. Setup was flawless; absolutely no configuration or special action required, just plug and go. The PA322UHD runs at all resolutions at 60 Hz, as it ought to.

There are system bugs too (not unique to the PA322UHD). At scaled resolutions, the native resolution is not reported correctly.

The 2013 Mac Pro has no trouble driving both the PA322UHD and a PA301W. No adjustments had to be made: connect the cable, boot up, job done, no issues whatsoever.

http://diglloyd.com/blog/2014/20141203_1544-NEC-PA322UHD-here.html
 
Last edited:
Comment

AppleDroid

macrumors 6502a
Apr 10, 2011
631
84
Illinois
The PA322UHD 32-Inch Professional UltraHD 4K display is here and attached to my 2013 Mac Pro. Setup was flawless; absolutely no configuration or special action required, just plug and go. The PA322UHD runs at all resolutions at 60 Hz, as it ought to.

There are system bugs too (not unique to the PA322UHD). At scaled resolutions, the native resolution is not reported correctly.

The 2013 Mac Pro has no trouble driving both the PA322UHD and a PA301W. No adjustments had to be made: connect the cable, boot up, job done, no issues whatsoever.

http://diglloyd.com/blog/2014/20141203_1544-NEC-PA322UHD-here.html
I seriously wish I had the funds for that beauty.lookimg forward to your tests.
 
Comment

Average Pro

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 16, 2013
421
176
Cali
Where is Apple Fanboy?

Actually, Apple fanboy said they were receiving these monitors. I'd like to hear from him.
 
Comment

goMac

Contributor
Apr 15, 2004
7,295
1,253
There are system bugs too (not unique to the PA322UHD). At scaled resolutions, the native resolution is not reported correctly.

Where do you see that? I'm not entirely sure that's a bug. On high density displays, resolution is measured in points, not pixels. There are ways to get the native pixel count, the software in question just needs to be upgraded to support that. But the measure of how big the desktop is on the screen != the pixel count of the display.
 
Comment

Average Pro

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jul 16, 2013
421
176
Cali
Who has acquired a larger than 30" pro monitor? Still interested in hearing form pro video and photography users.
 
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.