It was a mistake for Sculley. It was maybe a mistake for Apple. It wasn't a mistake for Steve Jobs. I personally like history the way it turned out, and won't second-guess it.
I'm just curious what comes after OSX.
Jobs' success in later years wasn't so much from going after the strongest competitor, though he did do that with Google, but from dodging the strong competitors entirely and finding new markets filled with only foolish naive incumbents. He avoided direct confrontation with Microsoft, HP, etc. and instead ransacked the likes of Creative in the MP3 market and Palm, RIM, and Nokia in the phone market. This is a skill that he learned only very slowly and painfully as a result of getting his ass kicked over and over at Apple and NeXT. Had he stayed at Apple in the 80s it is quite likely that he would have wasted Apple's resources on futile battles with MS and IBM.I spent some time talking to Guy Kawasaki about this years ago. His take was that in business you have to know who is your opponent, and Apple picked the wrong one when they went after IBM. They didn't know it then but their real enemy and competitor was Microsoft. Seems strange to consider today, but from the mid-'80s and well into the '90s Microsoft's relationship with Apple was more as an important developer than competitor. The question is whether Steve Jobs would have identified where Apple's real challenge was coming from faster than Scully did (or arguably, never did), and found a way to meet it. We can't know the answer to that question, and I have a hard time coming up with a basis to frame even an educated guess.
Its like Dragon Ball Z when Gohan left home to train with Piccolo for the battle against the saiyans.
Jobs' success in later years wasn't so much from going after the strongest competitor, though he did do that with Google, but from dodging the strong competitors entirely and finding new markets filled with only foolish naive incumbents. He avoided direct confrontation with Microsoft, HP, etc. and instead ransacked the likes of Creative in the MP3 market and Palm, RIM, and Nokia in the phone market. This is a skill that he learned only very slowly and painfully as a result of getting his ass kicked over and over at Apple and NeXT. Had he stayed at Apple in the 80s it is quite likely that he would have wasted Apple's resources on futile battles with MS and IBM.
But then we wouldn't have had NeXT and Mac OS X.
Things might've been different for the better had Jobs not been ousted, but things still turned out pretty well.
Being fired from Apple was one of the best things that could have happened to him. Forcing Scott Forstall out was a mistake.
Its like Dragon Ball Z when Gohan left home to train with Piccolo for the battle against the saiyans.
A large part of this is not true. For whatever else you might say about Scully, Apple reached levels of profitability during his tenure that it had not before and would not for many years after. Jobs brought him in because he understood that the company needed "adult supervision." It was being run into the ground by undisciplined amateurs, of which Steve Jobs was the prime example. Scully ran it like a real company, and that is exactly why he was hired. When Jobs and Scully didn't agree, Jobs tried to undermine him. He made the board decide whether it would be him or me. It was a dumb ultimatum. Steve lost. Nobody to blame but himself.
The company Scully runs now is not building phones in India, they are selling them in India. They are making them in China.
Being fired from Apple was one of the best things that could have happened to him. Forcing Scott Forstall out was a mistake.
Actually it was for the best. Jobs' experience at NeXT and Pixar were essential and without that Apple would not be where it is today. Obviously this is by accident and certainly no design of Sculley.
Sculley belongs to a small group of former Apple employees who tries to exist or survive in the media by reminding us of stories or comments about Steve Jobs...:
Actually it was for the best. Jobs' experience at NeXT and Pixar were essential and without that Apple would not be where it is today. Obviously this is by accident and certainly no design of Sculley.
----------
No, he has confessed several times in the past. It's how he gets his name out there these days.
Sculley belongs to a small group of former Apple employees who tries to exist or survive in the media by reminding us of stories or comments about Steve Jobs...
![]()
It's hard to think of another explanation. How odd to be bringing this up now, such very old news. Why Sculley would want to remind anybody of his time at Apple is beyond me....
In other "revelations" from the lips of John Sculley
- Water is Wet
- Sky is Blue
- 2 + 2 may equal 4 (confirmation is still pending, but he has a committee studying the question)
Will this guy EVER shut up? And when will Apple blogs stop paying attention to him? This is almost as bad as how Steve Wozniak keeps popping up and saying dumb things.
You don't read much do you? Sculley drops Jobs name every chance he can get. He easily could have said "I'm not here to talk about that, I thought you wanted to hear about the cheap crap I'm selling in India..." but he didn't. He always answers the Jobs question because he is a marketing guy and he knows how to get his interview published. He does this 2-3 times a year. That perfectly matches the media's memory and attention span. Again I say, he's a marketing guy.That's just plain silly. He was asked about it in an interview that was mainly about his mobile phone venture in India. Makes a person wonder how many people bother reading the articles on which they seem to feel a need to comment.
You don't read much do you? Sculley drops Jobs name every chance he can get. He easily could have said "I'm not here to talk about that, I thought you wanted to hear about the cheap crap I'm selling in India..." but he didn't. He always answers the Jobs question because he is a marketing guy and he knows how to get his interview published. He does this 2-3 times a year. That perfectly matches the media's memory and attention span. Again I say, he's a marketing guy.