Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Jokes aside, though, I wonder what made him do it. Simple greed, money problems, curiosity about whether he’d be caught? I feel like there’s an important part of the story we don’t know, since not everyone with positions that give them privileged information exploit that information.
Knew he would not get any prison or significant penalties. These people in power have zero fear of consequences from our legal system. Why not as Nike slogan says “just do it”. There is no downside whatsoever. I am above the law and better than all you who obey our laws. The bottom line as to why they do it…ego's.
 
There is an easy fix for stuff like this:
People who work for publicly traded companies and have access to said companies financial reports are prohibited from owning/trading said company’s stock - or at the very least have a blackout window the prevents them from trading weeks before and after.
 
By definition, making an example of somebody means that that person will have a punishment that does not fit the crime.

It was literally at the discretion of the judge, which means it was within range of a fitting punishment. He wasn't just "somebody" convicted of insider trading, he was the guy in charge making sure no one was committing insider trading.
 
This is the problem with so many prosecutors. It’s impossible to serve justice for particular crime when you’re trying to make an example of somebody.

By definition, making an example of somebody means that that person will have a punishment that does not fit the crime.

Note: I am not suggesting society goes easy on white collar crime; it is a terrible crime with real victims, I am simply advocating for justice. Inflated sentencing is a terrible disservice to any moral society and is, itself, a crime.
The crime literally carries a prison sentence. It's written into the law. You are arguing for leniency.
 
Agree. To use someone as an example after already paying fines/serving time is horrible and both the prosecutor and judge should be removed from service and have to serve time.
The prosecutors were asking the judge to apply the actual sentence terms that are written into the law. The defense was arguing for leniency. The prosecutors made the very valid point that part of the reason sentences are imposed is to deter future criminals from committing such acts. That is fundamental to the moral, philosophical and ethical, and historical basis of criminal law.
 
The crime literally carries a prison sentence. It's written into the law. You are arguing for leniency.
Read the article and my post. The prosecutor specifically stated he wanted to make an example when asking for a harsh sentence and the judge disagreed.

My entire argument was against using the discretion of the court to impose an overly harsh sentence for the self purpose of “making an example.”

You were specifically ignoring the entire context of western law to twist the tiny fragment of excerpted words of the prosecutor to make your point.

Not at all. I stated emphatically that such crimes have victims and must have consequences. I was specifically addressing prosecutorial misconduct in imposing sentences that do not fit the crime.
 
He was just the fall guy for Mr. Apple. Now his boss will really start thinking he's Timbo the Great!


wall-street.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Stenik
A salary/bonus/perks worth millions and he threw it all away for a relatively measly couple of hundred grand, thinking he'd get away with it. The greed, the arrogance, the stupidity.

Epitomises why lawyers have such a bad reputation as human beings.
Was thinking exactly the same.
And it didn’t really hit me until the end of the article where it says that the defendant has already lost his job and wasn’t able “to practice law anymore”…

“ah that’s right, it is a lawyer” is what finally sinked in.
 


Former Apple director of corporate law Gene Levoff was today sentenced to a fine and four years of probation for insider trading, according to Bloomberg. Levoff was facing up to two years in prison, but he will avoid time behind bars.

apple-logo-cash-feature.jpg

Levoff's role at Apple was supposed to include ensuring that Apple employees were compliant with the company's insider trading policies, including enforcement of "blackout periods" around Apple's earnings reports, but he ended up committing the crime he was meant to police.

Due to his position, Levoff was given access to Apple's earnings results before they were made available to the public, and he used the information to buy Apple shares prior to better-than-expected results, and sell shares when there were weaker-than-expected earnings. Levoff earned around $277,000, and avoided losses of around $377,000 before he was fired by Apple in 2018.

Levoff last June pleaded guilty to six counts of securities fraud for insider trading, and his sentencing took place today. In addition to four years probation, Levoff will pay approximately $604,000.

Federal prosecutors argued that Levoff should be sent to prison for insider trading to deter other corporate executives from committing a similar crime, but the judge overseeing the case said that he didn't feel it was necessary because Levoff lost his job and will no longer be able to practice law.

Article Link: Former Apple Lawyer Gene Levoff Avoids Prison After Insider Trading Conviction

This is BS!!!

How is this considered good law practice by the procecution when
$277,000 EARNED
Plus
$377,000 of avoided losses!?
By my math that's $404'700, yet because he paid just under $200'000 more he avoids jail time and probation for 4yrs?! He should've been stripped of ability to practice that profession for life!
 
This is BS!!!

How is this considered good law practice by the procecution when
$277,000 EARNED
Plus
$377,000 of avoided losses!?
By my math that's $404'700, yet because he paid just under $200'000 more he avoids jail time and probation for 4yrs?! He should've been stripped of ability to practice that profession for life!
My math is:
277,000 - (-377,000) = 654,000
 
Can’t practice law anymore. What kind of job does someone get after getting de-barred and fired from Apple?
 
So a similar lawyer, when they're ready to retire, could pull this and just potentially lose winnings and never work again? No jail time? Well, shiiiiiiii....
Your social circle and family won’t see you in the same way again. Trust gone and shame arrives. For me that would be worse than any federal punishment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cylack
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.