Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That's what Steve Ballmer pretty much said about the first iPhone... They feel threatened.
 
LOL laughably reminiscent of what phone company execs said ahead of the iPhone. And that too was a low margin business -- back then.

And wow, like, they make cars out of STEEL?! Holy crap! If only Apple, say, I dunno -- had some experience pioneering manufacturing techniques around the use of metal, say, I dunno, aluminum...

:rolleyes:

Making a phone or computer out of aluminum is a little different then making a vehicle. Besides Ford is already the first to do that in a mainstream vehicle. The new F-150 is built out of all aluminum body panels.

I don't know maybe in 5 years Apple will be the largest automaker in the world with people lining up for it's $100,000+ cars. You never know, but I'm not going to hold my breath.
 
Al vehicles

Making a phone or computer out of aluminum is a little different then making a vehicle. Besides Ford is already the first to do that in a mainstream vehicle. The new F-150 is built out of all aluminum body panels.

I don't know maybe in 5 years Apple will be the largest automaker in the world with people lining up for it's $100,000+ cars. You never know, but I'm not going to hold my breath.

Audi has been building all aluminum vehicles as part of their lineup for over 15 years.

----------

"They'd better think carefully if they want to get into the hard-core manufacturing," he said of Apple. "We take steel, raw steel, and turn it into car. They have no idea what they're getting into if they get into that."

Apple takes the Periodic Table and turns it into phones, computers, displays and a whole bunch of other things. Cars are not that hard, just ask all those backyard mechanics.

Apple has vision, passion and money, just the things GM lacks.
 
A comparable article about the impending failure of the iPhone:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aRelVKWbMAv0

That was a laugh. Thanks.

Self-important Bloomberg writer in 2007 said:
The big competitors in the mobile-phone industry such as Nokia Oyj and Motorola Inc. won't be whispering nervously into their clamshells over a new threat to their business.

The iPhone is nothing more than a luxury bauble that will appeal to a few gadget freaks. In terms of its impact on the industry, the iPhone is less relevant.

Apple will sell a few to its fans, but the iPhone won't make a long-term mark on the industry.
 

Attachments

  • 1396606123982.jpg
    1396606123982.jpg
    33 KB · Views: 69
Don't underestimate new players

"They'd better think carefully if they want to get into the hard-core manufacturing," he said of Apple. "We take steel, raw steel, and turn it into car. They have no idea what they're getting into if they get into that."

Apple takes the Periodic Table and turns it into phones, computers, displays and a whole bunch of other things. Cars are not that hard, just ask all those backyard mechanics.

Apple has vision, passion and money, just the things GM lacks.
 
That's what Steve Ballmer pretty much said about the first iPhone... They feel threatened.

The FORMER CEO feels threatened how exactly? And his comment was nothing at all like Ballmer's. Did you read the actual article?
 
Responses...

Yeah, and don't forget that the iPhones have not been issue-free. A flaw like the iPhone 4 antenna but on a car-scale can end a company pretty quickly.

you're just holding your steering wheel wrong. Completely your fault that you went straight into that tree!:D

Here's a free bumper for your car.

what? No default bumper? let me guess, it'll be added in v3.0.

at least v2.0 will get us a muffler and catalytic

Guess you guys missed the fact that that was a Samsung/Android mis-information campaign - every phone in the world has antennae on the outside somewhere, and if you hold them wrong, they drop calls. And the stats on dropped calls were 1,000 times WORSE on the Android phone at the time...but we won't talk about that.

Cheers,
Cameron
 
Guess you guys missed the fact that that was a Samsung/Android mis-information campaign - every phone in the world has antennae on the outside somewhere, and if you hold them wrong, they drop calls. And the stats on dropped calls were 1,000 times WORSE on the Android phone at the time...but we won't talk about that.

Cheers,
Cameron

Guess you missed the fact that it doesn't matter if other phones have the problem - the iPhone had it - and Apple gave away free bumpers to silence the outcry.

PS - it wasn't an Android/Samsung campaign dear misguided one. The onslaught of media was brought on by Apple's CEO sending out poor responses to a genuine issue people were having. The media ate it up.

And please provide your evidence that Android phones (and which ones) drop calls 1,000 times worse.

Let's talk about that!
 
The FORMER CEO feels threatened how exactly? And his comment was nothing at all like Ballmer's. Did you read the actual article?

The guy had no experience in cars when he went into GM, so I think his comments if not worse than Balmer, are at least much more ironic ;-).
 
The guy had no experience in cars when he went into GM, so I think his comments if not worse than Balmer, are at least much more ironic ;-).

That's another matter and at least viable feedback to the comment. Claiming his comments are the same as Ballmer's shows a lack of reading comprehension to those making the claim.

But then again - many of these people are also posting that same comment pages into a thread where it's been said before. So clearly reading comprehension (or impulse control) is an issue.
 
Why use steel.... there was this new alloy reported last week that was a mix of steel and aluminum that was as light and as strong as titanium but as cheap as aluminum. If I was starting out I'd look into that.

My understanding of the car industry is that GM, Ford, Toyota actually buy large numbers of components and consultancy from 3rd parties. So it would be unlikely that Apple wouldn't do that too... This would cut down the project as a whole.

One thing is true is this if Apple are looking to make a car they will only do it if it is a game changer and makes the guy from GM loose his shirt within 5 years of it coming out.

I'd be surprised if they do a car but it was rumored that Steve was looking at if I remember correctly 5 or so years ago on this very website!

It might be on their bucket list.... along with the TV/Games Console, Watch, Search engine etc....
 
Last edited:
Nothing to worry about

He's ignoring the fact that people have always been willing to pay more for Apple products. Odds are Apple's margins wouldn't be the same as GM's.
 
Why use steel.... there was this new alloy reported last week that was a mix of steel and aluminum that was as light and as strong as titanium but as cheap as aluminum. If I was starting out I'd look into that.
Better yet... make it unapologetically plastic?!
 
the auto companies (especially the giant, incompetent, domestic ones like GM) are ******** their pants in fear of Apple making a car. It's gonna completely run them out of business.

Apple won't run them out of business because Apple will never design, manufacture or sell a car. Anyone that believes they will is delusional.

----------

Apple takes raw Aluminium and turning into phones.... what are you taking about ? Apple prob have the best manufacture setup around. Do you think they go into a new area with out doing there homework? well its in the title .... Former GM CEO.....

Manufacturing a phone that fits in your hand and a 3000+ pound car are two different things. Why you people don't understand this can only be chalked up to willful ignorance or blatant disregard for reality.

----------

There's only low profit margins for you because your monopoly privilege and sloven acquiescence to labor union thuggery has awarded you no incentive to be profitable or even engage in the most basic innovation, competition, or customer service.

Apple has insanely high margins only due to the fact that they have basically what amounts to slave labor in China. If anyone is delusional it's you.

----------

This is very true; the state has made car manufacturing a nightmare for entrepreneur and innovators. Because of the excess of regulation, or am I repeating myself, cars have essentially become homogenized. Features are basically the same across all manufacturers, save for packaging. Providing the customer what they want ended decades ago. Federal law now forces manufacturers to give customers what the state says they need.

This proves it right here. You are so far from reality it's scary to think people like you exist in large numbers.

----------

Sarcasm?

Slapping a supercharger on is hardly innovative...I can't think of anything innovative about the ZR1.

Well that's because you don't know anything about the ZR1. That's why you can't think of anything.

----------

Anyway, Apple carves laptops from blocks of milled aluminum.

GM was using CNC machines before Apple even existed, forms of CNC have been around since the end of WW2. You can't be serious with that nonsense. CNC machining has been around for half a century, what Apple does with it is neither special or innovative. And the term you were looking for is billets of aluminum, not blocks of milled aluminum.

When GM carves a car out of a block of steel, let me know.

When Apple can release a telephone that understand what time zone it is in with rock solid reliability then maybe I'll have faith they can start interviewing people needed to design the control system for a car. Until then I have no faith they have any clue how to manufacture a car.

----------

. . . . and he continued . . . Look at us, we're GM and we're still trying to figure out how to make a vehicle that people might want to buy.

They sold 10 million cars in 2013. If you think that's a low number then you don't understand car manufacturing. GM is doing just fine on selling cars.

----------

"They'd better think carefully if they want to get into the hard-core manufacturing," he said of Apple. "We take steel, raw steel, and turn it into car. They have no idea what they're getting into if they get into that."

Apple takes the Periodic Table and turns it into phones, computers, displays and a whole bunch of other things. Cars are not that hard, just ask all those backyard mechanics.

Apple has vision, passion and money, just the things GM lacks.

Astounding just how delusional you people are.

----------

Guess you guys missed the fact that that was a Samsung/Android mis-information campaign - every phone in the world has antennae on the outside somewhere, and if you hold them wrong, they drop calls. And the stats on dropped calls were 1,000 times WORSE on the Android phone at the time...but we won't talk about that.

Cheers,
Cameron

Yes, deflection is the perfect defense. It doesn't matter who did what worse, it was inexcusable. That's the worst defense you can make. "So what, it was worse over there, yell at them!" Childish. Utterly Childish.

----------

He's ignoring the fact that people have always been willing to pay more for Apple products. Odds are Apple's margins wouldn't be the same as GM's.

Apples margins are so high because they have what amounts to slave labor in China. The car industry doesn't tolerate that ********, you pay people well or you don't get things made. Apple won't succeed in the car industry because they are completely dependent on dirt cheap labor. If they try and hire people to build cars for what Apple would have to pay to maintain that margin they'd get laughed at. You people forget that Apple was instrumental in making sure that their employees didn't get the chance to get a better job and therefore restricted their ability to make higher earnings. Apple doesn't' care one bit about paying what people are worth, they went to court over making damn sure people didn't get paid what they were worth because they are cheap. They have high profit margins because they don't want to pay people to make their products in countries where it isn't tolerated.
 
I knew this would be the first post. And I am so disheartened to be proven right.

Just because Apple has billions in cash from successful products, does not have any correlation whatsoever to their ability to enter a new market (both new to them and to industry as a whole) without making mistakes.

It would seem to correlate when those successful products were all new categories at one point.
 
It would seem to correlate when those successful products were all new categories at one point.

None of those categories were new when Apple released those products. They were the best at initial release, but everything Apple has released in the last decade wasn't in a new category at all. There were tablets, laptops, music players and "smart" phones long before Apple released a product in those categories. There's obviously debate on which was best and Apple has been terrifically successful in those categories to bolster the argument that they released the best ones, but they were by no definition new categories.
 
People can't seem to get it through their head. This retired CEO answered some questions and does not represent GM in the slightest.

He is still consultant. GM, Ford, and Tesla now realize that for the past few years Apple has been preparing to develop an electric vehicle with the Chinese for their market. Think Cutting Edge Rickshaw, somewhat. More utilitarian like a Honda Element. All with 38% margins. All manufactured in China. :rolleyes:
 
Apples margins are so high because they have what amounts to slave labor in China. The car industry doesn't tolerate that ********, you pay people well or you don't get things made. Apple won't succeed in the car industry because they are completely dependent on dirt cheap labor. If they try and hire people to build cars for what Apple would have to pay to maintain that margin they'd get laughed at. You people forget that Apple was instrumental in making sure that their employees didn't get the chance to get a better job and therefore restricted their ability to make higher earnings. Apple doesn't' care one bit about paying what people are worth, they went to court over making damn sure people didn't get paid what they were worth because they are cheap. They have high profit margins because they don't want to pay people to make their products in countries where it isn't tolerated.

I want to point this out too in case anyone missed it in your long post.

Apple isn't going to be able to come along and demand 45% profit margin on cars. Not unless they're aiming to compete in the prestige or premium car category (like Tesla).

The sheer costs of production of automobiles means you can't just offload labour to china or other 3rd world nations. You will have to build the car local (or close to local) due to many regulations and import restrictions on autos

And since if they build a car, it will be likely be built in one of the other existing known manufacturing locations that make cars that are 'legal' in North American markets. So this likely means it'll come from Japan, Korea, USA, Canada, Mexico, Germany.

All of these countries have significant union presence in their automotive sector. the cost of Manufacturing will be high. (in Ontario, working on an auto plant starts in the $30/hour range).

So unless Apple is willing to take a huge hit on their margins, or are willing to price themselves a good 20-30% higher than their competition for similar class vehicle, I believe it is very unlikely from a business decision, nevermind technical, that Apple is entering the Automotive market as a car manufacturer.
 
None of those categories were new when Apple released those products. They were the best at initial release, but everything Apple has released in the last decade wasn't in a new category at all. There were tablets, laptops, music players and "smart" phones long before Apple released a product in those categories. There's obviously debate on which was best and Apple has been terrifically successful in those categories to bolster the argument that they released the best ones, but they were by no definition new categories.

I meant for Apple...
 
I want to point this out too in case anyone missed it in your long post.

Apple isn't going to be able to come along and demand 45% profit margin on cars. Not unless they're aiming to compete in the prestige or premium car category (like Tesla).

The sheer costs of production of automobiles means you can't just offload labour to china or other 3rd world nations. You will have to build the car local (or close to local) due to many regulations and import restrictions on autos

And since if they build a car, it will be likely be built in one of the other existing known manufacturing locations that make cars that are 'legal' in North American markets. So this likely means it'll come from Japan, Korea, USA, Canada, Mexico, Germany.

All of these countries have significant union presence in their automotive sector. the cost of Manufacturing will be high. (in Ontario, working on an auto plant starts in the $30/hour range).

So unless Apple is willing to take a huge hit on their margins, or are willing to price themselves a good 20-30% higher than their competition for similar class vehicle, I believe it is very unlikely from a business decision, nevermind technical, that Apple is entering the Automotive market as a car manufacturer.

The net profit for high end makers is 10-13% while the dealer takes 5-8%. If you're selling directly (like Tesla wants to do), you probably can take half the dealer margin and get an about 15% profit margin. That's not even taking into account the added margin an Apple may have with highly integrated electronics : pushing 20% wouldn't be surprising at all.

You say, well that's still not 40%. Maybe not, but the Auto industry right now is a nearly 2 Trillion dollar industry and revenues are in general quite high for most makers. Very few right now are losing money unlike the cell phone business. The profit margins of the cell phone business wasn't really high either before Apple got there (and it still isn't for anyone that's not Apple and Samsung).

So, with a net profit of 20% on 75B of sales (slightly below the size of BMW right now) (say 10 years out) would be 15B profits around 2025. Not Iphone like business... But what is?

Apple can'T relly on the Iphone alone giving them that kind of profit eternally. That is unlikely.

The car industry is one of the biggest industry on earth. Not sure Apple making a car would be the only way to get a big part of the pie. But, it is not as much out of left field as it seem.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.