Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple makes a platform that companies make money on.
Apple charges companies that make a profit on that platform to use that platform.
This is not complex or unfair.
So, by that reasoning, should Microsoft get a cut from everything that is installable on Windows?
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
I am concerned about having Apple decide what is and is not appropriate content to be used on the phone that I have purchased from them. Especially since they are not being consistent in their censorship.

I wonder how many people (not saying you specifically) hold this opinion but were fine when social media networks silenced certain voices/opinions/thoughts/facts etc. and claimed "they are private businesses, they can allow/disallow what ever they want on their platform(s).

For the record, I am not happy that Apple doesn't allow certain content on apps in the store, Pax I support you, but the fact is I just don't care enough to switch. Apple does far more right than they do wrong IMHO. If I cared that much I would switch to Android.
 
Last edited:
If they want to they could, Linux still exists.

Naah don't agree with your view. But hey good that you stand by your principles....let a corporation decide what you can or cannot do.

I for one I am knowledgeable enough to decide what I want to install on any of my computing devices, not need Apple or any other company decide what can I install on devices I fully paid for. This is a step in the right direction, and hopefully in a few years this becomes the norm in every country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
I buy their products because they work for me. I like pluralism. I like living in a society where there are choices.
I honest to god want the choice of getting my parents a phone that only has one App Store that’s curated and no way of sideloading whatever some popup on a website claims to be. Guess that choice is now taken from us.
 
Naah don't agree with your view. But hey good that you stand by your principles....let a corporation decide what you can or cannot do.
I don't want corporations to decide what I can do. Apple or Microsoft can't stop me from using a Linux PC or getting a Fairphone. I just don't want the government to decide what kind of tech product I get to purchase for myself.
 
35-45% is the range for Apple’s margins. Apple’s hardware gross margins are about 36%. Services margins are about 70%. Overall margins are about 45%. Now, that’s gross margins but the commenter was roughly correct about that.

Net margins for Apple are 26%, however.
So the original commenter wants Apple to give their devices at cost, no margin… sure, whatever
 
I honest to god want the choice of getting my parents a phone that only has one App Store that’s curated and no way of sideloading whatever some popup on a website claims to be. Guess that choice is now taken from us.
It has not been taken away from you - since the choice hasn't existed for years (since enterprise developer certificates exist). You can - viewed technically - sideload today. Whether you're intending to use one of the shady alternative stores today - or you're tricked into installing an app from a web site.
 
since the choice hasn't existed for years (since enterprise developer certificates exist). You can - viewed technically - sideload today. Whether you're intending to use one of the shady alternative stores today - or you're tricked into installing an app from a web site.
If grandma has the tech skills to manage to figure that out, I think she's fine.
 
I can still choose what I want to buy...
Well, you can't buy Fortnite (for iOS), given that you seem to be located in the U.S., can you?

E.U. government intervention will make it possible to buy at least for E.U. consumers (see original post). That's choice being brought forward by E.U. regulation.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: strongy
Yes, but a hole has been poked in the secure "walled garden" that I chose to use and have chosen to pay into.
Not really.

Sideloading is possible today. Apple just doesn't allow it for trustworthy developers (to protect their bottom line). Though they are quite happy to rake in those enterprise device sales for having "poked a hole" in the walled garden and allowing installation of unreviewed apps years ago.

Also, even apps purchased through other marketplace still need to be reviewed and notarised by Apple.

So what new hole has been poked, really?
 
Not really.

Sideloading is possible today. Apple just doesn't allow it for trustworthy developers (to protect their bottom line). Though they are quite happy to rake in those enterprise device sales for having "poked a hole" in the walled garden and allowing installation of unreviewed apps years ago.

Also, even apps purchased through other marketplace still need to be reviewed and notarised by Apple.

So what new hole has been poked, really?
Insecure payment systems
 
  • Like
Reactions: strongy
They’re gonna have to play by the new rules, else same old same old…

And it’s not their call to call something illegal, they can file suit and let the law take its course - which they have experience with…
 
Insecure payment systems
„PayPal said their platform was not breached“

„A credential stuffing attack is when hackers take username and password combinations leaked through data breaches and attempt to use them at other online services“


Anyhow, that doesn’t really affect you with regards to your iOS purchases - because Apple has introduced „reduced“ commission on outside purchases that are (purposely) economically unviable for developers - so every transaction will go through their first-party App Store?
 
  • Angry
Reactions: strongy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.