balamw said:Well Fox shouldn't get all the blame, AD is produced by Imagine (Ron Howard and Brian Grazer's company) as is 24. So it may be more that Imagine has decided the show is dead after the Showtime deal fell apart, so why push it.
B
Plecky said:Are you ready for Firefly The Complete Series (no, not the first season since it didn't even last a full first season) to become #1. I know I am, it's been there many times on Amazon.com's top selling DVD's, and along with family guy deemed worthy enough and got a second breath. Unfortunately it's breath wasn't as long lived as family guy's has been, but Serenity was still a great film. If you haven't checked out this show, you're in for a treat. If you have, then I'm just preaching to the choir. As they say on GeekDrome, "if battlestar gallactica is star trek, then Firefly is star wars." Well that and what's better then if han solo got his own TV show? Firefly's not far off, purely amazing. Also, awesome with Buffy although S1 was somewhat weak (yet still better then a lot of things you find on TV, especially those shows' first seasons), hopefully they'll get the second and third one in their soon, since those are arguably the best (and my personal favorites). Ooo I'm happy even though I already own them on DVD, it's still awesome!![]()
Plecky said:Are you ready for Firefly The Complete Series (no, not the first season since it didn't even last a full first season) to become #1. I know I am, it's been there many times on Amazon.com's top selling DVD's, and along with family guy deemed worthy enough and got a second breath. Unfortunately it's breath wasn't as long lived as family guy's has been, but Serenity was still a great film. If you haven't checked out this show, you're in for a treat. If you have, then I'm just preaching to the choir. As they say on GeekDrome, "if battlestar gallactica is star trek, then Firefly is star wars." Well that and what's better then if han solo got his own TV show? Firefly's not far off, purely amazing. Also, awesome with Buffy although S1 was somewhat weak (yet still better then a lot of things you find on TV, especially those shows' first seasons), hopefully they'll get the second and third one in their soon, since those are arguably the best (and my personal favorites). Ooo I'm happy even though I already own them on DVD, it's still awesome!![]()
JDOG_ said:Yeah to me it still seems like a niche market, but obviously everyone's doing very well with this new model of distribution...especially the networks.
Still, for the discerning techie out there, it's honestly hard to convince them to spend $1.99 on a DRM'd 320x240 video they can buy the next day, when they can get a ~624x352ish version for free, about an hour after the show airs (East Coast Time) with no DRM via bittorrent.
I'm not advocating piracy, but that's the distribution model you're fighting if you're the content providers and the options you're looking at as a entertainment-seeker.
dynamicv said:However, this doesn''t stop Apple from negotiating with producer/networks in other countries to put locally produced content on that country's store. In the UK, Green Wing and Dr. Who are good examples of shows that could both be on iTMS solely for British customers.
6163621 said:RESPECFULLY can Macrumors preface such news with "Only for U.S. Customers has..."
For others it is a big "so!?!?" moment![]()
U.S. networks sometimes sell their TV shows to other networks, like the BBC. They used to sell the shows after they were aired, so the series "Dallas" was shown a year later in England. Selling their shows on Itunes would screw up their international sales. If you want to see some American TV shows, check out my web page"www.psychicshoppers.com" I have lots of mpegs up there from my public access TV show The Psychic Shopping Club. It's not quite as good as 24, but it's free.
Cless said:Need to add House, like hardcore.
Actually, I still don't care about House being added, until they can get the quality sold on the iTMS up. 320 x 240 in 2006 is just embarrassing, H.264 or not. I want at LEAST 640 x 480 (or 640 x 360 for 16 x 9 shows). I understand the limitations of portable H.264 decoding, but advancements have been made.
Yes I agree Cless. I am against H.264 for that very reason. I use Handbrake to rip all my EyeTV2 HDTV recordings with the 2-pass FFMPEG encoder to De-Interlaced 624 x 352 @ about 1000 kbps (351MB target size to equal half a CD) without H.264 for iPod compatability (max 230,400 pixels allowed) and they look great on both the iPod as well as on the big 1920 x 1200 computer screen or TV.Cless said:Need to add House, like hardcore.
Actually, I still don't care about House being added, until they can get the quality sold on the iTMS up. 320 x 240 in 2006 is just embarrassing, H.264 or not. I want at LEAST 640 x 480 (or 640 x 360 for 16 x 9 shows). I understand the limitations of portable H.264 decoding, but advancements have been made.
Jesus said:Now Family Guy is only a matter of time...