Falling demand is an indication of a product that "people actually want"? I see.
Yes but every car manufacturer does this while Apple keeps full prices until the day the the new models are announced.
Falling demand is an indication of a product that "people actually want"? I see.
Likely any impacted is already reflected in the guidance that was adjusted.
Again, this is a problem very specifically related to a slowdown in China.
The prices weren’t too high in markets like the US, Canada, Spain, Italy, Germany and Korea where records were set. Prices won’t be dropping there, but they might in China and already have.
When i was a kid Mercedes launched the baby Benz, the 190. People and magazines and printed articles were all "Can Mercedes offer a cheaper quality car? No way". Among many things it used to be the standard taxi car in my country. You easily found models beyond 1 or 2 million kms.Go ask BMW or Chanel to see if they cut prices just because they make less money in a quarter.
But you forget all the services you can sell to every new customer you won. No iPhone - no entry. This means for Tim to also sell no Apple Music - no iCloud plan - no Apple TV maybe not even the cheapest Mac.Just FYI (because this concept seems lost on most people), the objective of a business is to turn a profit, not rule the headlines with market share stats. A 100% market share means nothing if you lose money on each sale.
When i was a kid Mercedes launched the baby Benz, the 190, currently called the C class, nowadays under that they do the A, CLA, GLA classes.
So yes, they do cut prices. They just find clever ways to do that.
BMW always had the 3 series (BMW is a brand that come from the bottom, unlike Mercedes) but nowadys they also have the 1 series, the 2 series, the X2, the X1....
They don't need to cut the prices of their stable models, the 5 series costs more or less the same of the A6 or the E-class.
Apple should do some cuts on the XS line as it is quite ridiculous outside the USA but not that much, the brand needs to be protected.
But they need versioning as the market is maturing (yes you can find it in MBA books) ie they need decent mid range offers, not half baked stuff like the 5C or badly priced as the XR.
It is not rocket science, they do it in the Macintosh, they did it in the iPod.
Wait...so apparently many people with lives to live and so many bills to pay don't want to spend a lot of money on a cell phone? Wow, that's surprising.
You beat AngerDanger with your art. Haven't seen AD for a week or so...
This could be due to Trade War! Maybe manufacturing jobs are moving back...
You beat AngerDanger with your art. Haven't seen AD for a week or so...
This moment was going to come sooner or later. The market is very near it’s saturation point. Just about everyone who wants a decent smart phone has one. And iPhones that are 3 or 4 years old still perform good enough. Those people will just get a new one when there’s gets super slow again or dies completely. There are still millions of us who prefer to upgrade ever 2-3 years so the iPhone isn’t going anywhere.
And to those saying there isn’t any innovation in the XS or XR are full of it. The problem is only partially pricing since the X was 999 last year and I see loads of them around in daily life. Even the XR is an amazing device. They could have released that last year at 749 and it would have stole the show completely and sold even better than the X did. It’s a mix of strategy and pricing along with market saturation. But it’s definitely not a lack of innovation. Face ID is amazing as are the cameras in these phones. I came from a 6S to an XR and was completely blown away especially by the cameras.
If you actually read those MBA books, then you know about branding and customer segmentation.When i was a kid Mercedes launched the baby Benz, the 190. People and magazines and printed articles were all "Can Mercedes offer a cheaper quality car? No way". Among many things it used to be the stable taxi car in my country. You easily found models beyond 1 or 2 million kms.
It is currently called the C class, nowadays under that they do the A, CLA, GLA classes.
So yes, they do cut prices. They just find clever ways to do that.
BMW always had the 3 series (BMW is a brand that come from the bottom, unlike Mercedes) but nowadays they also have the 1 series, the 2 series, the X2, the X1....
They don't need to cut the prices of their staple models, the 5 series costs more or less the same of the A6 or the E-class.
Apple should do some cuts on the XS line as it is quite ridiculous outside the USA but not that much, the brand needs to be protected.
But they need versioning as the market is maturing (yes you can find it in MBA books) ie they need decent mid range offers, not half baked stuff like the 5C or badly priced as the XR.
It is not rocket science, they do it in the Macintosh, they did it in the iPod.
They also have a steep hill to climb there. iWorks is just too lacking in basic functionality.Nobody can compete with Google Docs, not even Microsoft. Google is purely cloud solution, and they are way ahead to the point I don't see anybody can catch up for a purely cloud based suite. Apple did have iWorks in the cloud, but we haven't heard anything else after the beta announcement way back when.
Apple will face better chance competing with Office 365. Both rely on traditional desktop apps. Apple can leverage their consumer friendliness and Apple ecosystem integration over Microsoft.
I doubt the iPhone 7 can make Apple a lot of money because it was designed as a top of the line, no compromises device. And as the years go by a lot of stuff in it doesn't impress any more, the screen for example. The Touch ID speed. The cell modem. I could go on. Fit and finish will always be great but the rest ages fast.If you actually read those MBA books, then you know about branding and customer segmentation.
And Apple does have mid-rangers. iPhone 7 starts at $450, and the A10 can mop the floor with mid-rangers chips from Qualcomm. In emerging markets, Apple is still selling the 6 and 6S for even less.
Apple's problem is their services. Right now, they rely on people buying new hardware all the time for revenue. With the upgrade cycle getting longer as people don't feel the need to upgrade their phones that often, Apple needs to put huge breakthroughs in their services. Right now, Apple is doing almost nothing to advertise iCloud services, and there are nothing major announced. Instead, they are chasing Netflix for no reason. Tim Cook really needs to put Eddie Cue to work.
Looks like the guy in charge of innovation at Apple has taken a 6 year sabbatical.
The way they are pushing and implementing their services is really p!ssing me off. They screwed up cloud support for Live Photos, so that people were losing their photos or else were losing the Live part of their Live Photos. Apple Music's interface is a total mess. The App Store is full of bloatware with in-app purchases... where as the good software is taking their subscription registration off the App Store completely because the App Store otherwise would demand a cut of it.If you actually read those MBA books, then you know about branding and customer segmentation.
And Apple does have mid-rangers. iPhone 7 starts at $450, and the A10 can mop the floor with mid-rangers chips from Qualcomm. In emerging markets, Apple is still selling the 6 and 6S for even less.
Apple's problem is their services. Right now, they rely on people buying new hardware all the time for revenue. With the upgrade cycle getting longer as people don't feel the need to upgrade their phones that often, Apple needs to put huge breakthroughs in their services. Right now, Apple is doing almost nothing to advertise iCloud services, and there are nothing major announced. Instead, they are chasing Netflix for no reason. Tim Cook really needs to put Eddie Cue to work.
Looks like the guy in charge of innovation at Apple has taken a 6 year sabbatical.
COMPLETELY WRONG
Please watch this 2 minute explanation from Steve Jobs
I'm part of the problem. Still rocking my SE because giant phones don't appeal to me ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Expected given the price and lack of innovation
Yeah when the model year is nearly over and mostly on base trims and stuff they have in stock. They don’t cut prices on the cars people actually want.
Or the Germans were way over priced? AC was optional on a luxury car!That was a special circumstance. I’m sure Lexus was losing money to gain market share with their first LS. It was priced ridiculously low. Near S Class quality for under E class prices.
Expected given the price and lack of innovation